In the past, healthcare practices paid fixed fees for software or IT services no matter how much they used them or what results they got. But now, with AI products, there are new ways to price these services. People pay only for the results they get or how much they use. These models match better with the real-world problems in healthcare, like staff shortages and mistakes that cause delays and extra costs.
One example is Synthpop, a company that automates up to 80% of healthcare admin tasks. Instead of a flat fee, they charge based on the tasks they complete. This links costs to results like fewer errors and less admin time. Healthcare leaders like this because they can see clear benefits from their AI spending.
Usage-based pricing usually means selling credit packages or units. Patients or staff use these when they interact with the AI. For example, a provider might buy 10,000 credits for $500 a month. If they buy more credits, like 50,000, the price per unit goes down, costing about $1,500 total. This lets clinics grow their AI use as needed without big upfront costs.
Medical practices want to improve patient health in a cost-effective way. Value here means better patient health for the money spent. Outcome-based pricing motivates providers to use AI that really helps, not just cuts costs at the expense of quality.
Researchers Elizabeth Teisberg, Scott Wallace, and Sarah O’Hara explain value in healthcare as the measured improvement in health compared to what it costs. They divide patient outcomes into three parts:
Pricing that charges based on tasks done or successful treatments matches spending with these goals. For example, AI that helps with scheduling or patient check-in affects patient flow and staff workload. If payment depends on how many tasks are done or how much efficiency improves, providers can better measure their return on investment (ROI).
Using AI in healthcare needs careful planning and study of the organization’s problems. AI often needs time and resources for setup, training users, and changing workflows. So, it is important to identify the biggest problems early. This way, resources go to the right places.
Good sales and deployment teams use a consultative approach. This means they do not just sell features but help healthcare leaders see how AI can improve work, lower risks, and help make better decisions. Early talks can show if an AI tool fits a practice’s unique needs.
Eric, a sales leader at Origami, says their short Proof-of-Concepts (POCs) compare AI costs with other options like human labor or old tools. This helps show the real value and sets clear ideas about pricing for customers.
POCs are important for adopting AI. They let medical practices try AI on a small scale with clear goals and ways to measure success. Unlike usual software trials, AI POCs need users to be active, data to be linked, and changes during the test.
Good POCs have these traits:
Tejas Sethian, a sales lead at an AI company, says that how much users like the AI is often more important for success than just the money saved.
Medical leaders thinking about AI should ask for detailed POCs with clear results, user feedback, and teamwork. This lowers the chance of failure and helps plan for costs and use.
Usage-based pricing gives flexibility but also brings challenges in budgeting and contracts. Healthcare leaders must predict usage well to keep budgets on track. Unlike fixed fees, costs can change each month, making planning harder.
It is important to get support from many people. Finance teams, doctors, and IT staff need to understand the expected benefits and costs. Clear cost details, good explanations of ROI, and regular updates on use build trust.
Hybrid pricing models mix fixed base fees with minimum usage amounts. This balances financial stability with the ability to scale. For example, a practice might pay a set monthly price plus extra depending on how much AI is used.
AI and automation are changing how front offices in healthcare work. They take over hard, repeated tasks that staff used to do. This helps with labor shortages and cuts down on mistakes, which are big problems in U.S. healthcare management.
One fast-growing area is AI phone automation. AI answering services handle patient calls, sort requests, make appointments, and answer common questions without needing a person. This lets staff focus on more important work and helps patients by cutting wait times and missed calls.
Simbo AI, for example, creates AI for front-office phone automation. Their system:
This kind of AI not only improves efficiency. It also lowers risks like missed appointments and delayed care. This helps keep patient care steady and raises patient satisfaction, matching goals of value-based healthcare.
In the U.S., healthcare is shifting to value-based models. These focus on patient health results rather than just the number of services. AI pricing that links cost to results fits well with this change.
Practices that use AI with outcome-based pricing can show better operations and financial care at the same time. Cutting down admin work lets healthcare teams spend more time on patient care, which supports the goals of value-based care.
Research from UT Health Austin shows that care focused on patient needs leads to better results with fewer treatments. AI tools that reduce chaotic workflows and improve communication give patients and providers a sense of calm and comfort.
Buying AI solutions in healthcare is not just a one-time deal. It needs ongoing partnerships where AI sellers act as trusted advisors. Consultative selling helps buyers see how AI fits into bigger goals like handling staff limits, improving quality, and better patient outcomes.
Vendors who share market knowledge, guide changes in workflow, and communicate openly about pricing and value build stronger trust. This makes the relationship about more than just products and leads to long-term cooperation that plans for future needs.
Healthcare leaders in the U.S. can gain several benefits by choosing AI solutions with outcome-based and usage-based pricing:
Medical leaders should carefully check if providers offer fair and clear pricing that fits their workflows and goals. Early study, solid POCs, and constant communication are key to successful AI use that delivers real value in U.S. healthcare.
Companies adapt across Pricing and ROI Strategy, Discovery and Qualification, Consultative Selling, and High-Leverage Proof-of-Concepts (POCs) to effectively scale AI-first solutions.
Pricing models should align with real value delivered, often using hybrid or usage-based pricing to reflect outcomes. For example, outcome-based pricing charging per completed task addresses labor shortages and error reduction effectively in healthcare.
It ensures early identification of high-potential leads by understanding organizational challenges, workflows, and priorities, improving resource allocation and avoiding costly poor qualification during AI solution deployment.
It helps guide buyers through ambiguity by educating on AI benefits, co-creating visions for improvement, building trust, and framing AI as a strategic enabler rather than just a product feature.
POCs demonstrate tangible value by tightly scoping goals, defining success metrics upfront, and showing efficiency and accuracy improvements, thus reducing adoption risk and accelerating contract conversion.
AI agents automate complex tasks end-to-end, significantly reducing manual administrative burdens, enabling scale without additional staffing, and improving workflow efficiency and decision quality.
Usage-based pricing introduces unfamiliar spend structures, requiring clear ROI narratives, usage forecasts, and stakeholder buy-in to balance cost predictability with scalability in dynamic healthcare environments.
By positioning themselves as thought leaders who understand industry-specific challenges, sharing market insights, and framing AI as essential future-proofing—thus moving relationships from transactional to transformational.
Early coaching bridges the knowledge gap about AI capabilities, helping buyers reimagine workflows, quantify benefits, and foster excitement, which facilitates smoother adoption and sustained engagement.
Tailoring POCs to organizational context, defining clear ROI or adoption metrics, engaging users actively in training and integration, and maintaining transparent communication ensures measurable impact and smoother transition to full adoption.