Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing many parts of healthcare. It is used for things like medical transcription, helping with diagnoses, and automating workflows. For people who run medical practices in the United States—like administrators, owners, and IT managers—it is important to know how to add AI to their work well. Adding AI is not just about putting in new machines or software. It also means thinking about how people and technology work together. This article talks about the main things that affect how AI is used in healthcare in the U.S., based on recent studies. It also points out why AI tools like automated front-office phone systems matter.
Using AI in healthcare organizations usually takes a long time and can be complicated. According to a 2023 study in the International Journal of Information Management, adopting AI, like medical transcription tools, should be seen as a long process, not a one-time change. This process requires care in four main areas: people, processes, technology, and data. This adds data as an important part beyond the usual people, processes, and technology model.
This model shows that AI depends a lot on good data and how staff and workflows are ready to use AI tools. The study used information from AI experts involved in research and business to understand what is needed at each step of adoption.
For U.S. healthcare organizations, especially medical practices, it means checking their current equipment and staff before using AI systems. They need to train staff, change workflows, and make sure data is clean and trustworthy while also upgrading technology. If they do not do these things together, AI might not work as expected or could be dropped because of problems.
A helpful idea from the research is Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs). These levels help check how mature a technology is and how ready an organization is to use it. In the U.S., healthcare administrators can use TRLs to make decisions about AI from early studies (low TRL) to full use and continuous operation (high TRL).
TRLs help find what an organization is missing—like not enough staff training, no connection with current IT systems, or bad data—and plan steps to fix these problems. For many health systems in the U.S., using AI widely depends on balancing technical readiness and organizational strength.
The word “socio-technical” means AI adoption is not only about the technology. It also includes people and how the organization works. This approach looks at how people, processes, and technology work together in healthcare.
It is also important that technical teams and business leaders work closely. This helps make AI adoption smoother and meet goals like cutting costs and improving patient care.
Trust is very important for using AI. A review of AI usage across different industries, including healthcare, found that trust, plus how useful and easy AI seems, predicts if people will use it. In the U.S., where patient safety and data security matter, trust in AI is even more important.
Worries about job loss and not understanding AI also cause resistance. Teaching staff about AI’s role as help, not a replacement, can ease these worries. Involving staff in AI projects helps them feel more positive about it.
Culture also matters. Some patients and providers prefer human contact over AI, no matter how good the AI is. U.S. medical managers must balance AI use with personal care to meet patient expectations.
One common AI use in U.S. healthcare is automating front-office tasks like answering phones and scheduling appointments. Companies such as Simbo AI offer AI systems to handle calls, patient questions, and booking automatically.
Medical managers must make sure AI phone tools follow privacy rules and can transfer sensitive calls to humans, keeping a balance between automation and personal care.
Even with benefits, AI use in healthcare faces challenges: staff and process readiness, data issues, and following U.S. health laws. The ups and downs of AI hype make some leaders careful about big spending.
Medical practices should check readiness in people, processes, data, and technology. This helps find what to fix first, like training, workflow planning, better data, or tech upgrades.
U.S. healthcare groups should also set clear goals for AI—like better transcription, lower admin work, or improved patient communication—and pick AI tools that match those goals.
AI use in healthcare will grow as technology improves and organizations get more ready. For U.S. medical practices, knowing both social and technical parts of AI, investing in data quality and training, and making sure tech teams work well with leadership will decide how successful AI efforts are.
Including data as a key part reminds leaders that managing data well is as important as buying AI software. As AI front-office automation grows, it offers real help with common issues like handling appointment calls and patient questions.
By checking readiness levels carefully, encouraging teamwork between IT and business, and choosing AI tools that fit their needs, U.S. healthcare providers can move from just being curious to using AI to make work better while keeping good patient care.
The study focuses on the socio-technical factors influencing AI adoption, particularly in healthcare settings, exploring how organizations can successfully transition to AI technologies for medical transcription.
Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) is a benchmark used to assess the maturity of a technology, providing a framework for understanding the organizational capacity for AI adoption.
The article suggests a model that integrates an extended version of the People, Processes, Technology lens with an additional focus on Data readiness, essential for successful AI implementation.
The key components for successful AI adoption identified in the study are the readiness of people, processes, data, and technology.
AI adoption is often approached with caution due to historical boom and bust cycles, making potential adopters wary of investing in new technologies.
Participants included a purposive sample of AI experts from various fields such as research, development, and business functions, ensuring a comprehensive view of the AI adoption experience.
The study emphasizes the importance of building bridges between technical and business functions to facilitate smoother AI adoption and integration.
Successful AI adoption in healthcare can lead to improved operational efficiency and enhanced patient care through accurate and timely medical transcription.
A significant barrier to AI technology adoption is the need for comprehensive readiness across people, processes, data, and technology, which varies among organizations.
Organizations can assess their readiness for AI adoption by evaluating their existing capabilities against the Technology Readiness Levels and identifying gaps in the areas of people, processes, data, and technology.