AI virtual agents (VAs) are computer programs that can talk like humans and do tasks such as answering patients’ questions, reminding them to follow treatments, scheduling appointments, and giving health advice. Immersive VR applications create 3D spaces that help with therapies like rehabilitation, exposure therapy, or teaching patients.
Many healthcare places use AI tools to give medical help to people who live far away or do not have many services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual healthcare tools helped reduce infection risks and made sure care kept going without physical visits.
Even with these benefits, using virtual agents and VR in healthcare raises questions about ethics, legal rules, and how to keep patients safe. These issues can affect how well organizations work and their risks if things go wrong.
Research shows it is important to include everyone involved early when making AI tools for healthcare. Inclusive design means working with healthcare workers, patients, IT managers, and legal experts to find needs and risks before using AI.
Following these ideas helps healthcare groups avoid problems like making patients feel left out, breaking laws, or using unsafe AI tools.
A review looked at 132 studies from 2015 to 2025 about AI in extended reality (XR) healthcare simulations, including immersive VR. Most studies (62.1%) used VR and showed positive effects on improving healthcare workers’ knowledge and decisions. Two controlled trials found training with AI characters helped healthcare workers make better decisions and do tasks faster.
But the evidence was not strong because of small numbers of participants and big differences in studies. Often, quality checks like bias tests and transparency reports were missing. The review suggested a system called DASEX to check AI’s adaptivity, safety, and bias. These checks are key to keeping trust and clear responsibility.
Recent studies also say healthcare staff need more training on ethics, law, and privacy before using AI tools. Proper training and slow introduction help use these tools safely in healthcare.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. face special challenges when using AI virtual agents and VR:
One important place to use AI virtual agents is in front-office work where many routine tasks take time from healthcare providers. AI automation can:
These uses can save money and make work smoother but need careful watching to make sure AI answers are right, safe, and respect patient privacy. For example, mistakes in triage could cause serious health problems if they are not caught in time.
Research shows using AI in healthcare raises important ethical and social questions. For example, less in-person contact due to AI can reduce empathy and trust between doctors and patients. Healthcare workers need training not only on technology but also on ways to communicate better despite these changes.
Also, healthcare providers must balance AI help with human judgment. It is still unclear who is responsible if AI gives wrong advice. Clear rules need to be made with input from providers, lawmakers, and tech makers.
Making sure AI tools reach all groups fairly is very important in the U.S., where health differences exist. Developers and healthcare groups should focus on including underserved people so they benefit from AI rather than being left out.
Medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers in the U.S. have an important job managing risks and duties when using AI virtual agents and immersive VR in healthcare. Using inclusive design and involving all users helps keep patients safe, meet legal rules, and make access fair. Adding good training, slow rollouts, and clear communication builds trust in AI’s role in healthcare teams.
Using AI in front-office work, like companies such as Simbo AI offer, shows how these tools can lighten workloads while following safety and privacy rules. But ongoing care, checks, and ethical attention are still needed as AI becomes more common in U.S. healthcare services.
Key ethical considerations include impacts on the doctor-patient relationship, privacy and data protection, fairness, transparency, safety, and accountability. VAs may reduce face-to-face contact, affecting trust and empathy, while also raising concerns about autonomy, data misuse, and informed consent.
AI agents can alter trust, empathy, and communication quality by reducing direct human interaction. Patients may perceive less personal connection, impacting treatment adherence and satisfaction, thus potentially compromising care quality.
Legal challenges involve licensing and registration across jurisdictions, liability for errors made by autonomous agents, data protection laws compliance, and determining applicable legal frameworks in cross-border care delivery.
Healthcare professionals must expand competencies to handle new technologies ethically and legally. Staff may lack training in privacy, security, and ethical decision-making related to AI, necessitating updated education and organizational support.
Incorporating user needs, experiences, and concerns early in the design process is crucial. Engaging stakeholders ‘upstream’ helps ensure privacy, safety, equity, and acceptability, reducing unintended negative outcomes.
They improve access for remote or underserved populations, reduce infection risks by limiting physical contact, and allow therapeutic experiences not feasible in real life, enhancing patient engagement and care delivery.
Safety concerns include ensuring accurate and reliable AI responses, preventing harm due to incorrect advice or system errors, and maintaining quality of care in virtual settings without direct supervision.
Transparency builds patient trust by clarifying the AI’s role, capabilities, and limitations. It also helps patients make informed decisions and enables accountability for AI-driven healthcare interactions.
Gaps include insufficient exploration of legal frameworks, long-term social impacts on professional roles, comprehensive ethical guidelines specific to AI autonomy, and understanding patient perspectives on AI-mediated care.
AI agents can support tasks like treatment adherence, education, and preventive advice, augmenting healthcare delivery while preserving human oversight to retain empathy, clinical judgment, and accountability in care.