Artificial Intelligence (AI) is now used to help mental health care. It can find mental health problems early. AI can also create treatment plans made just for one person. Some AI tools work like virtual therapists. These systems use data to study how patients behave, talk to others, and how their bodies react. This helps doctors diagnose and watch patients better. For example, AI can notice small signs of depression or anxiety before doctors see them. This allows for faster help when it is needed.
AI tools can help solve some problems in mental health care. For instance, they can offer help when trained therapists are hard to find or far away. AI can give support at any time of day. People might feel safer talking to AI because it is private. Treatments can also be based on each patient’s own data.
But, using AI also brings up important ethical questions. Privacy, fairness, who is responsible, and how patients take part are all issues. These questions are very important in the United States, where privacy rules are strict, and people expect good protection.
One big concern about AI in mental health is keeping patient information safe. AI systems need many details about patients. This includes how people feel, behave, and their health records. It is very important to protect this data from being seen by the wrong people.
In the U.S., the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) sets strong rules for patient data. But AI brings new risks. Digital mental health platforms collect large amounts of data, sometimes outside normal medical places, which can increase exposure to cyberattacks. Healthcare leaders must make sure AI follows laws and uses strong security, like encryption and hiding personal details.
Bias in AI can cause unfair treatment. AI tools learn from training data. If the data mostly shows one group of people, AI might work worse for others. This hurts fairness.
There are three types of bias in healthcare AI:
In the United States, where patients come from many backgrounds, AI bias is a serious problem. If not checked, AI can make health differences worse by giving wrong or less helpful care to minorities.
Many AI systems work like a “black box.” This means their inner workings are hard to understand. Doctors and patients should be able to know why AI makes certain decisions. This is called explainability.
Transparency connects to who is responsible for AI. Healthcare organizations must watch AI use to make sure it doesn’t harm patients. They also need clear records about AI’s role in making treatment choices. Laws and ethical rules require that AI decisions be open to review.
If AI is not clear, mistakes and biases are hard to find. This reduces the trust doctors have in AI and might risk patient safety. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is working on rules to review AI devices for mental health. The goal is to balance new technology with safety.
AI tools, like virtual therapists, can help more people get mental health support. But they cannot replace humans completely. Human empathy, judgment, and ethical care are still very important.
Studies show patients do better when a real therapist works with digital tools. Healthcare providers need to use AI to help doctors, not take their place. Keeping this human touch helps build trust and better treatment results. Without it, patients may stop using the care and results may be worse.
The United States faces special challenges and chances when adding AI to digital mental health care. A 2025 survey by the American Medical Association (AMA) found that 66% of doctors use AI tools, up from 38% in 2023. This shows AI is growing fast in healthcare.
However, 68% of those doctors say AI must be carefully watched to make sure it helps patients and does not cause harm.
Besides HIPAA, new rules are being made by FDA panels to guide AI safety and transparency. Hospital managers and IT staff in the U.S. must keep watching these rules and make their own policies to follow them.
Because U.S. patients come from many ethnic and economic backgrounds, AI tools must be tested carefully on different groups. Planning for technology should include input from doctors, patients, and ethics experts. This helps ensure AI is fair and responsible.
AI affects not only clinical care but also how healthcare offices run. This is important for medical managers and IT teams. For example, AI can handle front-office phone services. These systems can schedule appointments, answer questions, remind patients, and sort calls without needing humans. This lowers work for staff and improves patient contact.
Companies like Simbo AI make tools for automating phone interactions in health offices. This reduces staff costs and missed calls while improving communication.
AI also helps with tasks like processing insurance claims, coding, and checking documents. Tools using Natural Language Processing (NLP) turn clinical notes into organized data. This makes billing more accurate and lowers mistakes. These improvements let mental health providers spend more time with patients and less on paperwork.
A 2023 report says AI-based workflows saved U.S. hospitals millions by cutting errors and speeding up revenue processes. This saving is helpful to mental health clinics, which often have limited budgets.
IT managers who put AI in place must solve problems linking AI tools with Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems. Training providers and clear patient communication are important to avoid problems. Cloud-based AI services give small clinics options without big costs.
To lower the ethical risks of AI in mental health, U.S. health groups should take many steps:
Following these steps helps medical managers and IT staff responsibly use AI while keeping patient trust and care quality strong.
JMIR is a leading, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on digital medicine and health care technologies. It ranks highly in Medical Informatics and Health Care Sciences, making it a significant source for research on emerging digital health innovations, including public mental health interventions.
JMIR provides open access to research that includes applied science on digital health tools, which allied health professionals can use for patient education, prevention, and clinical care, thus enhancing access to current evidence-based mental health interventions.
The journal covers Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs), including therapist-assisted and self-guided formats, highlighting their cost-effectiveness and use in treating various mental health disorders with attention to engagement and adherence.
Therapist-assisted iCBTs have lower dropout rates compared to self-guided ones, indicating that therapist involvement supports engagement and adherence, which is crucial for effective public mental health intervention delivery.
Long-term engagement remains challenging, with research suggesting microinterventions as a way to provide flexible, short, and meaningful behavior changes. However, integrating multiple microinterventions into coherent narratives over time needs further exploration.
Digital health literacy is essential for patients and providers to effectively utilize online resources. Tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) help assess these skills to tailor interventions and ensure access and understanding.
Biofeedback systems show promise in improving psychological well-being and mental health among workers, although current evidence often comes from controlled settings, limiting generalizability for workplace public mental health initiatives.
AI integration offers potential improvements in decision-making and patient care but raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the right to explanation, affecting ethical delivery of digital mental health services.
Barriers include maintaining patient engagement, ensuring adequate therapist involvement, digital literacy limitations, and navigating complex legal and ethical frameworks around new technologies like AI.
JMIR encourages open science, patient participation as peer reviewers, and publication of protocols before data collection, supporting collaborative and transparent research that can inform more accessible mental health interventions for allied health professionals.