In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become a helpful tool for healthcare organizations in the United States. It helps improve patient care, makes operations smoother, and supports clinical decisions. But using AI in healthcare also brings challenges related to data privacy, ethics, and following rules. Patient information is very sensitive. If this data is not handled properly, it can lead to privacy problems, legal issues, and loss of trust.
Healthcare administrators, practice owners, and IT managers need to know and use best practices for ethical AI data use. These include collecting only the data that is needed, using clear and reliable consent methods, and keeping strong data retention policies. This article explains these best practices with a focus on U.S. healthcare, including relevant laws and technology safeguards.
AI systems need large datasets to train machine-learning models and make predictions. In healthcare, these datasets often include private information like medical histories, lab results, images, and demographic data. Collecting and using this sensitive data raises the risk of unauthorized exposure or misuse.
Jennifer King, an AI fellow at Stanford University, notes that companies collecting data to train AI models now gather data everywhere. This widespread collection affects civil rights. For healthcare organizations, it means they should carefully limit data collection to only what is necessary for the AI’s purpose.
The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) supports this idea through a rule called “data minimization.” Even though GDPR is an EU law, its strict rules have influenced privacy standards worldwide, including in U.S. healthcare. The rule says only to collect the minimum amount of personal data needed for a specific legal reason. Following this reduces how much sensitive data is at risk.
Using minimal data collection helps avoid problems like:
These points are very important in healthcare. Patients must trust their providers to protect privacy.
Consent is a key principle of data privacy and ethics, especially in healthcare. Patients expect to control how their data is used, including when AI processes it.
One problem is that AI training sometimes uses data collected for other reasons, without clear consent to use it in AI. Jennifer King points out that personal information, like photos or resumes shared for one purpose, can be reused to train AI systems without users knowing. Healthcare groups must avoid this to stay clear and ethical.
In the U.S., there is no national AI-specific privacy law yet. But some states, like California with its Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and Utah with its AI and Policy Act, stress clear consent and data protection. These laws follow guidelines from the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) in their “Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.” This framework puts focus on:
Healthcare providers should make consent procedures that help patients understand how AI will be used, what data is collected, and why. Consent should be:
Ben Wolford, editor at GDPR.eu, explains that it is very important to record consent properly and respect patients’ rights to withdraw it. Even though these rules come from EU laws, they work well as examples for U.S. healthcare groups wanting to build trust and openness.
Healthcare practices can use consent management tools to track patient permissions for AI data use. This helps follow state laws, reduce legal risks, and show ethical care.
Keeping patient data longer than needed increases the risk of exposure and misuse. Healthcare organizations should create and follow data retention policies that meet legal rules and good practices.
GDPR requires that data be stored only as long as needed, after which it should be deleted or anonymized. Although GDPR mainly applies in the EU, similar ideas are becoming important in U.S. healthcare IT compliance.
Jeff Crume, IBM Security Distinguished Engineer, warns that large AI datasets attract cyberattacks. Hackers may try to manipulate AI to get sensitive data. Keeping data only for a limited time lowers the chance for such attacks.
Good data retention policies include:
Limiting how long AI systems store patient data helps reduce risks and protect patient privacy.
To follow rules and ethics, healthcare groups need governance frameworks to oversee AI data use. These frameworks should:
IBM’s Guardium AI Security tool is an example. It helps find security issues in AI data and systems all the time, helping keep privacy and compliance steady.
Data governance tools also let groups automate reports and adjust quickly to changing privacy laws across states. This is important in the U.S., where federal rules are few, but state laws differ.
One practical AI use in healthcare is front-office automation. This includes automated answering services and phone systems. Companies like Simbo AI provide AI-powered phone automation made for medical offices. This technology lowers administrative work by handling patient calls, scheduling, reminders, and simple questions without risking patient privacy.
Using AI in front-office tasks must follow ethical data use rules:
AI workflow automation helps clinical work by:
To use AI front-office tools well, healthcare leaders must work closely with tech providers. They need to check compliance, privacy, and ethical standards. Clear policies and training for staff are important for responsible AI use.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. operate in a complex set of rules. HIPAA remains the main law for medical information privacy. AI adds new concerns. There is no national AI-specific privacy law yet. Instead, state laws and frameworks like the OSTP’s AI Bill of Rights guide responsible AI use.
Clinics, hospitals, and medical practices must handle these changing standards by:
Balancing AI benefits and patient protection needs constant education, risk checks, and governance. IT managers, administrators, clinicians, and compliance officers should work together all the time to handle AI privacy challenges.
Key steps for healthcare groups to use AI data ethically include:
By using these practices, healthcare groups in the U.S. can support responsible AI use while protecting patient data and trust.
Key privacy risks include collection of sensitive data, data collection without consent, use of data beyond initial permission, unchecked surveillance and bias, data exfiltration, and data leakage. These risks are heightened in healthcare due to large volumes of sensitive patient information used to train AI models, increasing the chances of privacy infringements.
Data privacy ensures individuals maintain control over their personal information, including healthcare data. AI’s extensive data collection can impact civil rights and trust. Protecting patient data strengthens the physician-patient relationship and prevents misuse or unauthorized exposure of sensitive health information.
Organizations often collect data without explicit or continued consent, especially when repurposing existing data for AI training. In healthcare, patients may consent to treatments but not to their data being used for AI, raising ethical and legal issues requiring transparent consent management.
AI systems trained on biased data can reinforce health disparities or misdiagnose certain populations. Unchecked surveillance via AI-powered monitoring may unintentionally expose or misuse patient data, amplifying privacy concerns and potential discrimination within healthcare delivery.
Organizations should collect only the minimum data necessary, with lawful purposes consistent with patient expectations. They must implement data retention limits, deleting data once its intended purpose is fulfilled to minimize risk of exposure or misuse.
Key regulations include the EU’s GDPR enforcing purpose limitation and storage limitations, the EU AI Act setting governance for high-risk AI, US state laws like California Consumer Privacy Act, Utah’s AI Policy Act, and China’s Interim Measures governing generative AI, all aiming to protect personal data and enforce ethical AI use.
Risk assessments must evaluate privacy risks across AI development stages, considering potential harm even to non-users whose data may be inferred. This proactive approach helps identify vulnerabilities, preventing unauthorized data exposure or discriminatory outcomes in healthcare AI applications.
Organizations should employ cryptography, anonymization, and access controls to safeguard data and metadata. Monitoring and vulnerability management prevent data leaks or breaches, while compliance with security standards ensures continuous protection of sensitive patient information used in AI.
Transparent reporting builds trust by informing patients and the public about how their data is collected, accessed, stored, and used. It also mandates notifying about breaches, demonstrating ethical responsibility and allowing patients to exercise control over their data.
Data governance tools enable privacy risk assessments, data asset tracking, collaboration among privacy and data owners, and implementation of anonymization and encryption. They automate compliance, facilitate policy enforcement, and adapt to evolving AI privacy regulations, ensuring robust protection of healthcare data.