AI technology depends a lot on data centers. These are buildings that hold computer servers for AI to work. Data centers use a lot of electricity, often made from fossil fuels. They also need a lot of water to keep the servers cool. For instance, making one computer that weighs 2 kilograms uses about 800 kilograms of raw materials. Some of these materials are rare earth elements, which are taken from the earth in ways that harm the environment. Data centers also create electronic waste that has dangerous materials, which can cause pollution if not handled properly.
Global estimates show that AI infrastructure might soon use six times the water that Denmark uses. Denmark has about six million people. This is a worry for the United States because some places already struggle with water shortages, especially in rural areas where healthcare services are important. The energy needed is also large. The International Energy Agency said that one request to ChatGPT uses ten times more electricity than a regular Google search. As AI grows in healthcare, its energy use will grow too if not controlled.
More than 190 countries, including the U.S., have made recommendations about using AI ethically. Some of these include environmental ideas. But environmental concerns are often not a main focus in national AI plans. Golestan Radwan, the Chief Digital Officer at the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), said, “Governments are rushing to make AI plans but often ignore the environment.” Without strong environmental rules, AI infrastructure might grow without checking its impact on nature.
Most AI rules focus on privacy, security, fairness, and bias. These are important. But many do not check how AI affects the environment well. This is true even in healthcare, where AI is used more and more. Without clear rules about AI’s environmental impact, healthcare groups might use resources too fast and pollute more.
At the world level, the United Nations, European Union, and World Economic Forum support AI to help with sustainability. They want different groups to work together and create fair AI rules. While these efforts are good, their effect on U.S. policies about AI and the environment is still growing.
The U.S. needs several steps to include environmental ideas in AI rules. This is especially true as healthcare uses more AI to work efficiently. Here are key steps to improve policy and practice:
There is no single way to measure how AI affects the environment, from data centers to hardware to energy use. Standard metrics are needed so healthcare groups can check how green the AI tools are. These should look at water use, greenhouse gases, raw material digging, and electronic waste from start to finish.
AI makers and users in healthcare should have to share information about their products’ environmental effects. This will help doctors and IT managers decide using AI with both good results and less harm.
The government should support energy-saving data centers, especially those for healthcare AI. Using clean energy like solar or wind can cut carbon footprints. Improving cooling systems to use less water is also important.
Responsible AI plans include many practices. Healthcare organizations should add environment rules too. Governance should follow national and world sustainability rules and watch AI from design through use.
AI environment rules need teamwork from government, tech companies, hospitals, and environment experts. Sharing knowledge and working together will help policies stay up to date.
Healthcare should push for clear and green sourcing of AI hardware. Buying from makers who use ethical methods and recycle well is needed.
AI automation helps healthcare offices by handling calls, scheduling, and talking to patients. These services lessen the need for live staff, saving time and costs.
But these systems run on cloud data centers that have environmental costs. Hospital leaders should think about choosing AI that is greener. Asking AI companies for environmental data helps find options that use less power and water.
Offices can also set up AI to handle common questions well and only use AI when needed. Watching how AI is used can help reduce energy use. Teaching staff about AI’s effect on nature helps everyone use AI more carefully and tell patients about green digital health.
The U.S. can take the lead by making strong AI rules with environmental protections made for healthcare. Since the country has a large healthcare system and uses AI a lot, good rules here can set an example for others.
Clear laws requiring AI makers to report environmental impacts can help keep AI use responsible. Agencies like the EPA, Health and Human Services, and the FCC could work together to set rules on energy, water, and waste for AI in healthcare.
Also, public and private groups can fund research on AI that uses less energy and water. Creating green AI technology could change how healthcare uses AI, making care for the environment a main goal.
Even though making AI more sustainable is needed, there are trade-offs. AI improves healthcare, which itself helps society. Rules must balance environmental costs without stopping progress.
Also, U.S. policies should handle other issues raised by the United Nations and European Union. These include ethics, data openness, and equal access to technology. These concerns affect how the environment is included in AI rules.
The best AI rules cover ethics, technology, daily use, and the environment. They need to change as new information comes in and as people give feedback.
Healthcare in the U.S. uses AI more and more, especially for front-office work. This means paying close attention to AI’s impact on nature is urgent. Current AI rules cover ethics and technology well but do less for the environment. This leaves gaps that could mean more resource use and pollution.
Main suggestions are to make standard ways to measure AI’s environmental effects, require companies to share this information, support energy and water-saving AI systems, and build strong rules that include environment care.
Healthcare leaders and staff should look for green AI choices, ask providers to be clear about impacts, and join talks on policy. By doing this, healthcare can help AI grow in a way that cares for the environment and shows leadership worldwide in using technology responsibly.
AI’s environmental problem includes high energy consumption, electronic waste generation, heavy water usage, and reliance on rare minerals often mined unsustainably, leading to significant greenhouse gas emissions and resource depletion.
AI can detect data patterns, anomalies, and predict outcomes, enhancing environmental monitoring accuracy. It helps track harmful emissions such as methane and assists governments and businesses in making sustainable decisions and improving resource efficiencies.
Data centres consume massive electricity, mostly from fossil fuels, generate electronic waste with hazardous substances, require large water quantities for cooling, and depend on rare earth minerals mined destructively, cumulatively impacting the environment negatively.
Higher-order effects include unintended consequences such as increased greenhouse gas emissions from AI-enabled technologies like self-driving cars and the potential spread of misinformation about environmental issues, undermining public awareness and climate action efforts.
UNEP recommends measuring AI’s impact with standardized methods, enforcing transparency in environmental disclosures, improving algorithm and hardware efficiency, greening data centres with renewables, and integrating AI policies into broader environmental regulations.
AI-related infrastructure may consume up to six times more water than Denmark, a country of 6 million, posing serious concerns given global water scarcity and the lack of access to clean water by many.
A single request to an AI virtual assistant like ChatGPT uses ten times more electricity than a Google Search, illustrating AI’s high energy demands relative to conventional digital activities.
The number of data centres surged from 500,000 in 2012 to 8 million currently, driven largely by AI’s explosion, thereby greatly intensifying energy and resource consumption associated with computing infrastructure.
While data centre impacts are better understood, AI’s broader environmental effects are uncertain due to unpredictable application usage, second-order consequences, and potential behavioral changes driven by AI technologies.
Over 190 countries have non-binding ethical AI recommendations including environment, with some legislation in the EU and USA; however, environmental considerations are often absent in national AI strategies, highlighting a policy gap in sustainable AI governance.