AI tools in healthcare often give recommendations or diagnostic suggestions. But how this information is shared can change how much clinicians trust and use AI help. In breast cancer assessment, accurate image reading is very important. Clinicians include interns, junior doctors, middle-level clinicians, and senior radiologists. Each group has different knowledge and experience. This affects how they understand and use AI information.
A study by Francisco Maria Calisto and his team looked at how changing AI communication to fit the clinician’s skill level affected diagnosis and trust. They compared regular AI communication—normal outputs without changes—to AI that changed explanation styles based on clinician experience.
The study found that personalized AI communication made diagnosis faster. Interns and junior clinicians were 1.38 times faster, while middle and senior clinicians were 1.37 times faster, without losing accuracy. This helps busy practices and hospitals with many patients.
Diagnostic mistakes dropped a lot, especially for less experienced clinicians. Interns and juniors who used a more confident AI agent reduced their mistakes by 39.2%. Middle and senior clinicians saw a 5.5% drop in errors when using a more suggestive AI agent. These numbers show that the AI’s communication style must match the user’s experience to keep safety and work well.
Doctors and hospitals in the United States work hard to reduce diagnostic errors. Errors can delay treatment or cause wrong treatment and increase healthcare costs. Traditional AI often shows numbers or chances but may not help doctors understand the reasons behind suggestions. In the study, doctors preferred AI agents that spoke firmly because they were clear and seemed capable.
The detailed and situation-based explanations from these AI systems were more helpful than just numbers. For example, an intern might get direct advice: “This lesion is likely malignant based on characteristic patterns.” A senior radiologist might get more careful advice: “Findings suggest malignancy, but consider benign options based on patient history.”
This way helps doctors keep control of decisions and also lowers mental effort needed to diagnose. The AI shares information in a way that fits each doctor’s knowledge and thinking. Lower mental effort is very important when doctors must quickly look at complex images along with other clinical facts.
This idea of changing AI communication styles can be used beyond breast cancer diagnosis. Hospital leaders and IT managers should know that AI needs to be adjustable to different user skill levels for it to work well and be accepted.
Trust in AI is important to use it well. If doctors do not trust AI or find it confusing, they might ignore helpful advice or rely on AI too much when they should not. Changing explanations to fit users helped doctors trust AI by clearly showing how ideas were reached and respecting their skills.
The study showed that AI with flexible ways of communicating helped make clinical work smoother. It cut down time for diagnosis and lowered mistakes. This helped reduce delays in busy radiology sections, improved patient flow, and might reduce healthcare worker burnout.
For medical managers and IT leaders in the U.S., using AI with these features can make better use of resources. Faster diagnosis means more patients can get appointments and cancer care teams can make quicker decisions.
Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in U.S. women, with more than 250,000 new cases expected each year. Early and correct imaging diagnosis helps improve treatment success. U.S. hospitals and imaging centers use many AI tools for mammography and imaging, but many still have trouble including these tools well in daily work.
The study by Francisco Maria Calisto and team gives important advice to U.S. healthcare centers working to improve AI diagnosis. Personalized AI communication can be added to current imaging systems to help all users, from interns starting their radiology work to experienced experts doing complex checks.
For those running medical practices, using AI that supports tailored explanations could help improve service and show care for patient safety and quality. It might also help meet growing rules about diagnosis accuracy and clear documentation through transparent AI advice.
An important related area is automating tasks in clinical settings, especially where front-office phone and patient information work is busy and task-based. Companies like Simbo AI focus on automating front-office jobs, using AI to answer calls and sort patient questions quickly. This lets office staff do work that needs human care and cuts patient wait times.
The ideas from tailored AI communication in breast cancer diagnosis can also be used in front-office automation. For example, an AI phone system linked to a medical practice could change how it talks with different callers—patients, doctors who refer patients, or staff—by changing tone, clarity, and how much detail it gives. This flexibility can make patients’ experiences better, reduce mistakes in scheduling, and improve internal communication.
Inside clinical work, similar AI tools can help spot urgent cases, give priority to breast imaging appointments, and find mismatches in what patients report. This cuts down on work for administrators, reduces clinical staff interruptions, and lets doctors focus faster on high-risk patients.
For IT managers in U.S. healthcare, adopting AI systems that not only automate routine tasks but can also change how they communicate based on user needs can improve both work efficiency and clinician happiness.
Investment in Adaptive AI Systems: Choose AI tools that give clear, relevant explanations suited to the user’s experience. This can improve diagnosis accuracy and reduce mental work for clinicians.
Training and Onboarding: Help clinicians, especially those less experienced, use assertive AI agents that offer strong guidance. This can speed learning and reduce mistakes.
Integration with Existing Technologies: Make sure AI systems work well with current imaging workflows and electronic health records for smooth data sharing and documentation.
Monitoring and Feedback: Use data to watch how AI communication styles affect diagnosis time and errors across clinician groups, then adjust settings as needed.
Patient Safety and Compliance: Focus on clear AI decision support, showing follow-through with healthcare standards and rules, which are strict for breast cancer diagnosis.
Front-Office and Clinical Workflow Automation: Use AI solutions that change communication not only in diagnosis but also in administrative tasks like answering calls and patient triage, as shown by companies like Simbo AI.
The study with 52 clinicians clearly shows that AI systems in breast cancer imaging work best when matched to the doctor’s skill level. Diagnosis was faster and had fewer errors, without losing safety or quality. This kind of AI communication builds trust, lowers mental stress, and fits well into healthcare routines. It helps both doctors and patients.
In U.S. medical clinics and hospitals, these results offer a way forward for better AI use in cancer imaging. When managers and IT people pick AI tools, they should focus not only on how accurate the AI is but also on how well it can change communication styles. Using AI that fits user needs will improve healthcare and meet growing demands for good, efficient breast cancer care.
The research focuses on how personalized AI communication styles affect diagnostic performance, workload, and trust among clinicians during breast imaging diagnosis, emphasizing the adaptation of communication based on clinicians’ expertise levels.
Personalized AI communication reduces diagnostic time by a factor of 1.38 for interns and juniors, and by a factor of 1.37 for middle and senior clinicians, demonstrating significant efficiency improvements without compromising accuracy.
Interns and juniors reduce their diagnostic errors by 39.2% when interacting with a more authoritative AI agent, indicating that assertive communication enhances their decision-making and confidence.
Middle and senior clinicians achieved a 5.5% reduction in diagnostic errors when interacting with a more suggestive AI agent, showing preference for nuanced, less authoritative communication that respects their expertise.
Clinicians value assertiveness-based AI agents for their clarity and competence, appreciating detailed and contextual explanations over simple numerical outputs, which helps build trust and supports better clinical decisions.
AI systems should provide adaptable communication to match clinicians’ expertise, balance assertiveness and suggestiveness, reduce cognitive load, maintain accuracy, and build trust to effectively integrate into clinical workflows.
Personalized AI communication reduces cognitive load by tailoring explanations to the clinician’s experience level, making information processing more efficient and less mentally taxing during diagnosis.
This research advances understanding of AI-mediated clinical support by demonstrating the benefits of adaptable AI communication styles in improving trust, reducing workload, and enhancing diagnostic performance in healthcare.
The study engaged 52 clinicians across multiple expertise levels (interns, juniors, middles, seniors) who diagnosed breast imaging cases using conventional and assertiveness-based AI communication, measuring diagnostic time, errors, and preferences.
Yes, the data and code are publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/MIMBCD-UI/sa-uta11-results, facilitating transparency and enabling further research in this domain.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
