Providers often feel unsure about using AI. Many doctors and staff do not know much about how AI tools work in prior authorization. This lack of knowledge can cause worry and doubt. Some fear losing their jobs, feeling less control, or having their work become harder.
There are also practical problems. Many clinics do not have the right IT setup to use AI or worry new software could interrupt their work. Jeremy Friese, MD, CEO of Humata Health, says these worries come more from the challenges of making AI work, not from distrust of the technology itself.
Providers also worry about ethical issues. Studies show that AI used by insurance companies can increase denial of prior authorizations by up to 16 times. People fear AI might unfairly reject care patients need. Experts suggest AI should only approve requests when very sure and leave denials for humans to review. This helps keep the process fair.
The usual prior authorization process often slows patient care. A survey by the American Medical Association found that over 90% of doctors say these delays stop patients from getting care on time. About 24% said delays led to serious problems like hospital stays, lasting harm, or death.
AI can help by handling much of the paperwork. It can gather medical documents quickly and correctly, cutting down on extra work for providers. For insurance companies, AI can check if requests match coverage faster, speeding up decisions.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) wants to improve these processes. They made a new rule to help decisions happen quicker and reduce paperwork. This means AI use will be important for doctors and insurers to meet new rules.
Tools that use AI can change how prior authorization works in clinics. These tools connect to electronic health records (EHRs), take needed data, organize it, and send it to insurers. This helps fix common issues like missing or wrong paperwork that cause delays.
Automation can also track requests in real time. This way, doctors and patients know the status, which improves communication and reduces confusion.
Jeremy Friese’s team suggests starting AI use by working together with human reviewers. AI reduces work but does not replace humans at first. Later, AI might handle up to 90% of requests automatically, leaving 10% for complicated cases that need human judgment.
This method keeps work efficient while making sure patients stay safe and the process stays fair.
A big obstacle to using AI is the lack of enough IT support. Many small or medium clinics do not have their own IT staff or enough resources to manage AI technology well.
To switch to AI smoothly, clinics must invest in technology and training. They need reliable computers and software that work with existing EHR systems without causing problems.
Training is important for doctors, staff, and IT workers. It helps them feel confident and learn how to use AI tools properly. Support services like help desks or contacts with AI providers can help users adjust to new tools.
IT resources should also cover updates and fixes over time. As AI technology grows, clinics need to keep up with maintenance and changes.
Balancing spending on technology with helping people understand and use it well can lower fears and resistance about new tools.
People often resist change, especially in healthcare where routines and safety matter a lot. Knowing why some providers resist AI helps address the problem. They may feel scared, worried about their jobs, or uncertain about new tasks.
Research from Prosci shows resistance means people care and should be listened to. Ignoring worries can make problems worse.
Clear and honest communication helps get providers on board. Explaining why AI is needed — like lowering paperwork and helping patient care — makes providers understand the benefits and lose some doubts. They should feel included, not left out.
Good communication answers, “What’s in it for me?” It makes the change seem useful for daily work, not something forced on them.
Strong and active leadership is key. Leaders who support AI, show acceptance, and encourage conversation build trust and confidence. Leaders who get involved stop quiet resistance and help staff accept AI.
Technical training plus hands-on help gives providers the knowledge and skills they need. Ongoing classes and feedback keep people comfortable with the new systems.
Healthcare leaders should care about how AI makes people feel. They should listen to worries, show understanding, and offer comfort. This helps reduce stress and feelings of threat.
Instead of waiting for resistance to happen, clinics should find possible problems early. By checking readiness and involving people from the start, they can plan ways to avoid strong opposition.
Doctors face rising rules and heavy work. The ADKAR Model — which stands for Awareness, Desire, Knowledge, Ability, and Reinforcement — helps guide people through change step by step.
We cannot ignore ethical concerns about AI in prior authorization. A 2024 Senate report said AI denial rates can rise up to 16 times normal, which worries many about patient access problems.
To fix this, a graded scoring method is suggested by Dr. Jeremy Friese of Humata Health. AI would only approve claims with over 90% confidence. Cases with lower scores or unclear results would be checked by humans before any denial.
This keeps patients safe from wrong denials due to AI mistakes or bias. It adds responsibility while letting AI speed up simple approvals and save costs.
Providers and administrators should push for AI tools that improve teamwork between payers and providers. AI can reduce confusion by sending only needed data to insurers, making the entire system smoother.
In the US, medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers play a big role in making AI work for prior authorization. They plan, budget, and manage how AI is put into place. They also make sure clinics follow CMS rules and meet insurance demands.
Administrators can lead communication by sharing clear reasons and benefits of AI. They can set up training and gather feedback from providers.
Practice owners decide how to spend money. They may hire IT staff or contract with AI vendors who know healthcare systems. Good budgeting is needed to build strong technology and keep training ongoing.
IT managers do the important job of linking AI tools with existing electronic records and fixing technical problems. They keep data safe and make sure AI fits daily operations.
Together, these leaders shape how AI is accepted by doctors and how smoothly the new technology is added to work.
Using AI in prior authorization can solve long delays and heavy paperwork problems in US healthcare. By understanding why providers hesitate, filling gaps in resources, and managing change carefully, clinics can switch to AI more easily.
The future means balancing AI automation with human checks, keeping ethical rules, and having open communication. With steady leader support and good training, AI can lower provider workload and help patients get care faster.
As CMS rules and industry trends push for more AI use, US medical practices that prepare well now will be better ready to follow rules and provide better patient care later.
AI automates and accelerates prior authorization by compiling clinical documentation for providers and enhancing review efficiency for payers, reducing delays that affect patient care. It streamlines data submission, ensuring only necessary information is exchanged, thus addressing inefficiencies in the manual process.
Provider hesitation mainly stems from a lack of understanding of AI’s capabilities and logistical concerns such as IT resource availability, implementation challenges, and change management complexities rather than distrust in the technology itself.
By expediting prior authorization, AI reduces delays in accessing necessary treatments, which can prevent serious adverse events, hospitalizations, and permanent impairments, ultimately improving patient care and outcomes.
There are worries that AI could increase denials of care unfairly, with reports of AI-driven denials being significantly higher than typical. Bias and inappropriate denials necessitate oversight mechanisms to ensure fairness and prevent unjustified patient harm.
AI should be allowed only to approve (‘Yes’) requests automatically when confidence is high but not to deny (‘No’). Cases with lower confidence scores require human review, ensuring accountability, transparency, and fairness.
AI integration should start alongside human reviewers to refine accuracy through manual adjustment feedback. Over time, as confidence grows, prior authorizations can become mostly touchless, reserving complex cases for human intervention.
AI streamlines submissions so providers send only relevant data, reducing information overload for payers and clarifying documentation requirements, which enhances collaboration and decreases manual inefficiencies.
The goal is for 90% of prior authorizations to be completely automated and touchless, with the remaining 10% involving human review of complex cases, supported by real-time patient transparency and updates driven by AI communication tools.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Final Rule mandates workflow modernization, along with financial incentives and public scrutiny, making AI adoption a necessity for both payers and providers.
Implementation obstacles such as limited IT resources, integration difficulties, and change management must be addressed through partnerships and dedicated support to facilitate smooth AI system deployment and acceptance.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
