Doctors have important responsibilities when they use AI tools in healthcare. Usually, doctor liability means being careful not to harm patients while giving care. But AI tools make this more complicated. Many AI systems use complex algorithms that doctors cannot easily understand. These systems give suggestions without clear explanations of how they made decisions.
Legal experts like Hannah R. Sullivan and Scott J. Schweikart point out that when AI algorithms are unclear, it raises questions about who is responsible for mistakes. Unlike normal tools, doctors may find it hard to fully trust or explain AI advice to patients. This makes it unclear if doctors can rely on AI results or how much they need to use their own judgment.
Leaders in medical practices also have to think about the role of companies that make and sell AI tools. If these tools break or give bad advice, manufacturers might be held responsible. In Europe, a new rule called the Product Liability Directive (PLD) includes software makers, and this is starting to affect the U.S. laws too. But U.S. laws still do not clearly say who is responsible in many cases, which causes risks for healthcare providers.
AI tools are meant to help doctors, not take their place. The American Medical Association (AMA) calls this “augmented intelligence.” They say AI should support doctors, reduce their work, and improve patient care. But ethical and legal worries remain.
One big issue is informed consent. Patients must be told clearly when AI is being used. They should understand the risks, limits, and how much AI is involved in their treatment. Experts like Daniel Schiff and Jason Borenstein say that patients need to know about AI especially in serious situations like robot surgery. Without clear information, patients’ agreement to treatment might not be complete. This could cause legal problems for doctors and hospitals.
AI can also have bias. Studies by Irene Y. Chen and others found that AI may work less well for some races, genders, or social groups because the AI was trained on biased data. This might cause unfair treatment and break laws against discrimination.
Medical managers have to make sure AI systems are tested carefully to avoid bias. They need to watch AI’s performance and update data over time. If AI uses old data, it may not work correctly as things change.
The AMA leads in giving advice about AI use in healthcare. It pushes for clear rules about being open, responsibility of doctors, data privacy, and security. A 2024 AMA report showed more doctors use AI, but they also worry about how it is applied and proven to work.
The AMA says doctors must keep the final say in patient care even when using AI. To help, the AMA offers training and tips so doctors can understand AI results and not rely on them too much or wrongly.
The AMA Intelligent Platform’s CPT® Developer Program works on creating medical codes and payment rules for AI-powered services. This helps track AI use in care and supports billing and legal records.
The AMA stresses being open with both doctors and patients. People need to know how AI makes decisions, what it cannot do, and when humans must step in. This openness helps build trust, supports patient consent, and lowers legal risks.
AI is also used beyond direct patient care. It automates office work in medical practices. For example, Simbo AI offers AI phone services that handle patient calls more efficiently.
Automation reduces paperwork and lets doctors focus more on patients. AI can handle appointment scheduling, answer questions quickly, and route calls smartly. This helps reduce mistakes, prevent missed visits, and improve patient experience.
But managers must be careful about legal and ethical issues here too. Automated phone systems handle sensitive patient information, so they must follow strict privacy laws like HIPAA. Data must be kept safe and secure to avoid legal trouble.
Patients should also be told when they are talking to an AI system instead of a person. This is important, especially if AI contacts lead to medical actions. Not telling patients about AI might cause problems with consent and patient control.
To work well, AI systems need to connect smoothly with electronic health records (EHR) and other software. If integration is poor, it can cause workflow problems and affect patient safety.
Healthcare IT managers play a big role in keeping AI safe and useful in medical offices. Their duties include:
Because AI affects both care and office work, IT managers must talk often with practice leaders and doctors. They need to fix issues before they affect patients or staff.
AI tools can improve healthcare by helping diagnosis, making work more efficient, and supporting personalized care. But they must be used carefully. Doctors and staff should stay alert to how AI changes care and office work.
The AMA says AI should help doctors, not replace them. Using this idea, medical offices can reduce legal risks by being open, supporting doctors’ choices, and holding AI to high ethical and quality standards.
U.S. laws about AI in healthcare are still developing. But by knowing possible risks and making strong safety rules, medical leaders and IT managers can guide AI use to improve care without breaking laws or ethics.
The AMA defines augmented intelligence as AI’s assistive role that enhances human intelligence rather than replaces it, emphasizing collaboration between AI tools and clinicians to improve healthcare outcomes.
The AMA advocates for ethical, equitable, and responsible design and use of AI, emphasizing transparency to physicians and patients, oversight of AI tools, handling physician liability, and protecting data privacy and cybersecurity.
In 2024, 66% of physicians reported using AI tools, up from 38% in 2023. About 68% see some advantages, reflecting growing enthusiasm but also concerns about implementation and the need for clinical evidence to support adoption.
AI is transforming medical education by aiding educators and learners, enabling precision education, and becoming a subject for study, ultimately aiming to enhance precision health in patient care.
AI algorithms have the potential to transform practice management by improving administrative efficiency and reducing physician burden, but responsible development, implementation, and maintenance are critical to overcoming real-world challenges.
The AMA stresses the importance of transparency to both physicians and patients regarding AI tools, including what AI systems do, how they make decisions, and disclosing AI involvement in care and administrative processes.
The AMA policy highlights the importance of clarifying physician liability when AI tools are used, urging development of guidelines that ensure physicians are aware of their responsibilities while using AI in clinical practice.
CPT® codes provide a standardized language for reporting AI-enabled medical procedures and services, facilitating seamless processing, reimbursement, and analytics, with ongoing AMA support for coding, payment, and coverage pathways.
Challenges include ethical concerns, ensuring AI inclusivity and fairness, data privacy, cybersecurity risks, regulatory compliance, and maintaining physician trust during AI development and deployment phases.
The AMA suggests providing practical implementation guidance, clinical evidence, training resources, policy frameworks, and collaboration opportunities with technology leaders to help physicians confidently integrate AI into their workflows.