The Colorado AI Act is one of the first state laws in the U.S. to control AI systems that make important decisions affecting people’s lives. The law focuses on AI tools that strongly affect healthcare access, costs, insurance, or essential services. Healthcare providers using these high-risk AI systems must follow strict rules about governance and being open.
Healthcare groups are called “deployers” under the law. They must work to stop AI from unfairly treating people differently based on race, ethnicity, disability, age, or language skills. For example, an AI scheduling tool might not work well for people who don’t speak English as their first language. Or, a diagnostic AI might give wrong advice for some ethnic groups because of biased data.
Healthcare providers need to:
These steps help keep trust as AI becomes more common in healthcare. They connect ethical use with legal rules.
AI developers also have duties under the Colorado Act. They must share important information like:
Developers must tell deployers and authorities if new risks of discrimination in their AI are found. This makes sure AI is checked and improved over time.
The Colorado Attorney General is the only one who can enforce the AI Act. Violations count as unfair business practices under state law. Patients or consumers cannot sue directly under this law. Following recognized risk management standards helps defend against enforcement actions.
Some exceptions exist, for example, HIPAA-covered groups using AI for recommendations that are not high-risk. Financial groups and federal AI purchases follow other or stricter rules.
Besides fairness and openness, healthcare providers need to handle AI cybersecurity risks. AI systems have special weaknesses, like problems with training data, attacks on AI decisions, and privacy worries about patient data.
The HITRUST AI Security Assessment with Certification lets healthcare groups check and prove their AI security levels. This program builds on HITRUST’s known cybersecurity ways and adds AI-specific rules. It follows international standards like ISO/IEC 42001 and includes NIST, HIPAA, GDPR, and other rules.
Getting this certification shows a healthcare provider wants to keep AI safe and protect patient data from cyber risks.
Medical practice managers, owners, and IT staff who use AI systems should set up strong governance plans. These plans cover legal, security, and operational risks. Important parts include:
Start by listing all AI tools in use or planned. Check if any are high-risk according to laws like the Colorado AI Act. This helps focus efforts on the most important systems.
Make clear steps for doing required impact assessments. These reviews look at:
Keep records and update them yearly or when big changes happen to the AI.
Train clinical staff, managers, and IT workers on their roles in managing AI risks. Help them understand AI decisions and how to explain them to patients. Teach staff to spot bias and report concerns inside the organization.
Make clear ways to tell patients when AI affects their care or administration. Explain AI’s role, any bad outcomes caused by AI, and offer chances to appeal or fix errors.
Work closely with AI vendors to make sure they meet laws about disclosures. Contracts should cover data sharing, bias handling, security duties, and quick alerts about discrimination risks. This supports joint compliance efforts.
Use current policies like HIPAA and NIST cybersecurity rules to add AI-specific controls. Getting HITRUST AI Security Certification or similar helps defend against cyber attacks and legal penalties.
AI also changes healthcare administration tasks. Automated phone systems and smart answering services show how AI helps with patient experience and office efficiency. Companies like Simbo AI use AI to manage appointment scheduling, patient questions, and follow-ups.
Using AI tools like Simbo AI can lower office workload and improve interactions. But healthcare providers should carefully check these systems for legal compliance, bias, and cybersecurity readiness.
The Colorado AI Act starts enforcement in early 2026. Other states will likely have similar laws soon. Healthcare groups in the U.S. should get ready by:
Taking these steps helps avoid legal trouble and keeps patient trust by using AI in a fair, open, and safe way.
AI has the potential to improve healthcare services. But it also brings legal and security challenges. Laws like the Colorado AI Act set out rules for managing risks, transparency, and responsibility for high-risk AI systems. Along with these rules, HITRUST AI Security Certification offers a guide to protect AI in healthcare.
Healthcare providers can meet these rules by doing strong impact assessments, sharing clear public information, adding AI governance to current compliance work, and following best security practices. It is also important to watch AI workflow tools carefully, since they affect patient contacts and office work.
Starting detailed risk management now will help healthcare organizations in the U.S. handle new AI laws confidently while supporting safe and fair care.
The Act aims to mitigate algorithmic discrimination by preventing AI systems from making unlawful differential decisions based on race, disability, age, or language proficiency, thereby avoiding reinforcement of existing biases and ensuring equitable healthcare access and outcomes.
The Act broadly regulates AI systems interacting with or making consequential decisions affecting Colorado residents, particularly high-risk AI systems that substantially influence decisions about healthcare access, cost, insurance, or essential services.
Healthcare providers must avoid algorithmic discrimination, implement and maintain risk management programs aligned with AI risk management frameworks, conduct regular and event-triggered impact assessments, provide transparency via patient notifications and public disclosures, and notify the Attorney General if discrimination occurs.
Developers must disclose training data, known biases, and intended use; document risk mitigation efforts; and conduct pre-deployment impact assessments evaluating discrimination risks to ensure transparency and minimize algorithmic bias.
Impact assessments must be completed before deployment, at least annually thereafter, and within 90 days following any intentional substantial modification to the AI system.
Assessments should cover the AI system’s purpose, benefits, risk analysis for discrimination, mitigation strategies, data processed, performance metrics, limitations, transparency measures, and post-deployment monitoring and safeguards.
Patients must be notified before AI-driven consequential decisions, provided explanations if AI contributed to adverse outcomes, and given opportunities to appeal or correct inaccurate data. Deployers must also publish public statements detailing their high-risk AI systems and mitigation efforts.
Discrimination examples include AI scheduling systems failing non-English speakers, biased diagnostic tools recommending differing treatments based on ethnicity due to skewed training data, and unfair prioritization of patients affecting access to care.
The Colorado Attorney General holds sole enforcement authority. Compliance with recognized AI risk management frameworks creates a rebuttable presumption of compliance. The Act does not grant consumers a private right of action.
Providers should audit existing AI tools, establish risk management policies, train staff on compliance, review contracts with AI developers for appropriate risk sharing, monitor regulatory developments, and implement governance frameworks for ethical and transparent AI use.