Before looking at how they work in medicine, it is important to know what Retrieval-Augmented Generation and Agentic AI are. They both improve how large language models work.
RAG is an AI system that makes usual language models better by adding a way to get information from outside sources. Instead of only using information it learned before, RAG can look up new information while working. In rheumatology, RAG systems use many clinical guidelines, such as those from the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR).
A recent study tested a RAG system made for adult rheumatology. It included 74 clinical guidelines and created 740 questions to check how well it worked. Independent rheumatologists and AI judges found that RAG did much better than simple language models on things like accuracy, safety, relevance, and completeness. The system gave high-confidence answers more than 70% of the time when combined with real-world evidence sources.
Agentic AI goes further by adding planning, memory, and tools for interacting with other systems. Unlike regular language models that just make text, agentic AI can do many-step clinical tasks by itself. These tasks include making personalized treatment plans, summarizing medical research, and helping make clinical decisions. These abilities are important for treating rheumatology patients because their conditions can change a lot.
Agentic AI can access live data and perform careful reasoning using tools outside itself. This allows it to work with clinical data, databases, and workflows, providing flexible and precise care.
Rheumatology deals with long-term diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and osteoarthritis. Patients can change quickly, so doctors need to keep checking and updating treatments using the latest clinical data, lab results, and research.
It is important for AI to access new data and think through several steps. Normal language models only use old, fixed information and can make mistakes by giving wrong or made-up answers. This problem is risky in medicine, where precise and correct decisions are needed.
Both RAG and agentic AI try to fix these problems, but they work differently. Looking closely at their uses can help healthcare leaders pick the best AI for hard clinical situations in rheumatology.
The RAG system that uses EULAR and ACR guidelines gave better and safer treatment advice. Tests showed it was much more accurate and safe than basic language models. Experts agreed the answers were safer, more complete, and reliable.
But RAG depends on good external databases. Since it gets information from these sources, it may not work well when doctors need AI to create new treatment plans or use patient-specific information.
Agentic AI can remember things and plan actions. It can make complex treatment plans using patient data, tests, guidelines, and new research. Because it can think through many steps and use outside tools, agentic AI is better for handling unique cases in rheumatology.
Rheumatology care must change as patient health changes. This means AI must quickly use new test results, images, clinical notes, and research.
RAG improves AI by letting it find information outside itself. But it mostly combines existing knowledge and rules. It does not have memory or work independently on tasks one after another. This limits how well it can help in real-time clinical work.
Agentic AI can remember past steps and plan next actions. It can update treatments based on how patients respond. It uses memory and planning tools to work with electronic health records, lab data, and drug lists at the same time.
Studies in biomedical question answering show both challenges and benefits of using many evidence sources. One system checked AI answers against a confidence rating scale. They compared a real-world evidence database made from health records, a PubMed retrieval system, and another PubMed generation tool. The real-world evidence database gave about 50% high-confidence answers.
When combining literature search with real-world evidence, confidence rose above 70% for clinical questions. This shows that using both retrieval and real patient data helps improve medical decisions. This fits better with how agentic AI works.
Even with technology advances, using AI like RAG and agentic AI in rheumatology has rules and challenges. In the U.S., healthcare must follow laws like HIPAA for patient privacy, FDA rules for medical software, and clinical oversight rules.
Because agentic AI works autonomously, there are worries about being clear, responsible, and liable for decisions. This means humans must oversee AI, and it should help doctors rather than replace them.
For administrators and IT staff, it is important to check AI systems for trustworthiness, connect them with existing electronic health records, and make user-friendly interfaces. AI that allows users to see how answers are made builds confidence.
AI is changing tasks like scheduling appointments, talking to patients, and helping with medical decisions. It can reduce front-desk work, improve patient flow, and make clinics work better.
Simbo AI automates phone calls, books appointments, and sorts patient questions. When combined with clinical AI like RAG and agentic AI, it helps clinics run smoothly.
AI automation allows quick replies to patient questions, better follow-ups, and more efficient use of doctor time. This is important because rheumatology needs frequent patient contact and complex care.
Agentic AI’s skill to use outside tools can also help with managing practice software, lab systems, and telehealth. It can create patient summaries, track medicine use, and plan follow-ups based on new clinical information, making work easier.
Medical administrators and IT managers in the U.S. must think about how choosing RAG or agentic AI will affect many parts of their work. This includes how accurate clinical help is, how well it fits into workflows, legal rules, and patient experience.
Administrators need to judge the strengths of RAG’s guideline-focused system and agentic AI’s wider abilities like working on tasks by itself and using live data. Agentic AI may need better infrastructure, data controls, and training to keep things safe and reliable.
IT managers handle picking vendors, making systems work well together, and managing cybersecurity. They should look for AI models that are clear and easy to add to current electronic health records and management software.
Together, administrators and IT staff manage AI use while balancing clinical benefits, laws, and acceptance by caregivers.
This article looked at the advantages and limits of RAG and agentic AI in rheumatology. It points out the need to match AI choices with real clinical, technical, and operational needs for healthcare providers in the United States.
Current LLMs have static knowledge and risks of hallucination, limiting their ability to handle complex, real-time rheumatologic care demands such as multistep reasoning and dynamic tool usage.
Retrieval-augmented generation helps mitigate some limitations of LLMs by incorporating relevant external information, but it still falls short for complex, real-time clinical scenarios in rheumatology.
Agentic AI extends LLMs by adding planning, memory, and the ability to interact with external tools, enabling the execution of complex, multi-step tasks beyond mere text generation.
Agentic AI combines LLM capabilities with memory management, planning algorithms, and API/tool interactions to dynamically handle complex workflows and real-time data integration.
Agentic AI is used in personalized treatment planning, automated literature synthesis, and clinical decision support, enhancing precision and efficiency in patient care.
Rheumatologic care requires real-time data access, multistep reasoning, and tool usage—complexities that agentic AI systems are uniquely designed to manage.
Agentic AI enables dynamic integration of patient data, literature, and clinical guidelines to tailor individualized treatment plans more accurately and adaptively.
Regulatory, ethical, and technical challenges must be addressed, including ensuring safety, data privacy, accountability, and managing the risks of automated decision-making.
Agentic AI can continuously retrieve and analyze new research, summarize findings, and integrate insights into clinical recommendations to support evidence-based practice.
Memory enables agentic AI to retain and utilize information from past interactions, supporting multistep reasoning and consistent decision-making over time.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
