Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a bigger part of healthcare. It is used especially in talks between doctors and patients. AI tools can help make medical information easier to understand. For example, AI can write patient-friendly discharge summaries after a hospital stay. Simbo AI is a company that works with phone automation and AI answering services. They show how AI helps with patient communication and making work easier.
For medical practice leaders in the U.S., it is important to know what AI can and cannot do in medical communication. Also, they need to find areas where more research is needed. This article talks about the problems in current research and suggests what future studies should look at. It also talks about how AI can help with medical office work.
Studies on AI communication, like AI-made discharge summaries, have given hopeful results. They seem to help patients understand their health and treatment better. One study at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin looked at how AI summaries affected patient understanding. The AI used was OpenAI’s GPT-4o model.
Out of 20 patients, 90% said they understood their hospital stay reasons, tests, and treatments better after reading the AI summaries. Before this, 75% already said they understood well. Older patients, those over 69 years, were especially interested in getting these AI summaries in the future. This shows that even older people want and can benefit from AI help.
But this study had limits. It was done in one place with few people. These limits matter when thinking about how the results apply to the U.S. health system.
The study only had 20 patients. This small number means the results may not apply to many different kinds of patients. Also, the study was done in one academic hospital. Hospitals in the U.S. vary a lot. Some are community hospitals, others large centers or rural clinics. Different places have different patients, so AI may work differently.
The study asked patients how well they understood by using surveys. It did not test understanding with objective tools. There was no control group to compare results. Patients might say they understand better just because it was new or because they want to please researchers. Future studies need control groups and real tests of understanding.
The study did not watch patients over time. We do not know if better understanding leads to following treatment plans better or having fewer hospital returns. Future studies should track patients for longer to see if AI truly helps health outcomes.
Using AI to make medical documents brings up legal and privacy questions. The study did not cover these problems well. In the U.S., there are strict laws like HIPAA that protect patient data. There are also rules from the FDA about medical software. AI tools must follow these laws and keep patient data safe.
AI models may be biased if they are trained on limited data. They might not work well for all racial, ethnic, or language groups. The U.S. has patients from many backgrounds. Future research must make sure AI tools are fair. They should work well for people with different education levels and those who do not speak English as their first language.
Future AI research in medical communication should focus on these areas:
Studies should include thousands of patients from many places. These places should cover cities, rural areas, and hospitals serving minorities. This will test AI tools on many kinds of people.
Research should use real tests like quizzes or scenarios to measure if patients understand. Combining surveys with doctor reviews and medical records can show if understanding leads to better choices and following treatments.
Studies should follow patients for several months. This can show if AI communication lowers hospital returns or improves medication use. Tracking these results helps decide if AI tools are worth it.
Research should study how well AI fits into hospital work. This includes doctor reviews, patient access online, and working with electronic health records (EHRs). Easy integration reduces work for staff and uses current technology better.
Researchers should ensure AI tools meet all U.S. laws. Studies should also test data security and how clear the AI’s reasoning is. Clear AI helps doctors and patients trust the technology.
Studies must check for AI bias and how it works for people from different backgrounds. They should include patients with disabilities or language barriers to make sure AI helps everyone.
Using AI, like Simbo AI’s phone services, can improve office work while helping patient communication.
AI can handle simple tasks like scheduling appointments, sending reminders, and answering common questions by phone or online. This lets office staff focus on harder tasks. It also makes patients happier and lowers missed appointments.
AI can send clear discharge summaries right after hospital stays. This helps patients follow care instructions and lowers chances of going back to the hospital because of confusion.
AI tools can connect to EHRs to get clinical data. They can then make easy-to-understand summaries without much manual work. This reduces the workload for staff.
Automating communication makes information delivery more consistent. This lowers mistakes that happen in verbal talks or handwritten notes. Patients get clear and correct information each time.
AI can make communication tasks faster. This saves staff time and lowers costs while handling more work in busy hospitals or clinics.
Even with these benefits, fitting AI into current hospital workflows is hard. Data sharing problems and staff resistance can slow adoption. IT managers must also handle cybersecurity and follow privacy laws like HIPAA.
Medical practice leaders and IT managers in the U.S. need to know current research gaps and plan careful future studies. Using AI tools like Simbo AI’s phone automation with tested AI communication methods can help meet patient needs and handle work demands.
The objective is to empower patients by improving their understanding of their medical condition, diagnoses, treatments, and follow-up care through simplified, AI-generated summaries derived from complex discharge letters.
OpenAI’s GPT-4o (version 2024-11-20) was used due to its strong clinical knowledge and effectiveness in summarizing medical texts.
Patient comprehension was assessed via an 11-item survey with a 6-point Likert scale, given before and after reading the summaries, measuring understanding of hospitalization reasons, diagnostics, therapies, and next steps.
90% of patients reported improved understanding after reading AI-generated summaries, including those with initially high comprehension; even older age groups showed particular interest and benefit.
90% of patients found AI-generated summaries more helpful for their comprehension than their physician’s discharge consultations.
The zero-shot prompting method produced the most effective summaries balancing relevance, simplification, fluency, coherence, and consistency, outperforming one-shot and chain-of-thought prompts.
No significant effect of age or number of prior hospitalizations on baseline health literacy or comprehension improvement was observed; patients benefited from AI summaries regardless of these factors.
Limitations include a small sample size (n=20), single academic center setting, lack of a randomized control group, reliance on self-reported comprehension without objective measures, and unknown long-term effects on health behavior.
Future studies should conduct larger randomized controlled trials, use objective comprehension assessments, explore diverse populations and languages, and examine AI accuracy and patient trust systematically.
Patients demonstrated a generally positive attitude toward AI in healthcare, with 85% wanting AI-generated summaries for future stays and supporting broader AI use in medical contexts.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
