Healthcare supply chains in the United States involve many suppliers, distributors, and delivery routes both domestically and internationally. A study by Willow Yang and Pamela Zelbst focusing on Texas healthcare organizations points out some common weaknesses in these supply chains:
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted these problems, showing how increased demand for medical products coincided with shortages.
Dividing healthcare materials into groups helps managers develop strategies suited to each supply type. The Texas study identifies four categories:
Each group requires its own sourcing, storage, and delivery methods, which calls for tailored resilience efforts.
Various strategies have been adopted to make healthcare supply chains more robust. Some of the common approaches used by U.S. medical practices and healthcare organizations include:
Using multiple suppliers lowers the risk linked to depending on a single source or region. McKinsey research shows that by 2022, 81% of companies worldwide had adopted dual or multi-sourcing strategies, up from 55% in 2020. While this reduces disruption risk, it may lead to higher costs.
Many U.S. healthcare organizations are shifting toward regional supply chains to reduce long shipping times and political uncertainties. McKinsey found that 60% of survey respondents regionalized their supply chains, with 33% moving production closer to where products are needed. Nearshoring can shorten delivery times and improve supply chain transparency.
Though just-in-time inventory reduces costs, the pandemic showed its limits. In 2021, 80% of companies increased their stock levels. At the same time, 71% planned to adjust inventory policies to balance resilience and costs. Stockpiling critical supplies, particularly medicines and clinical items, helps handle sudden demand increases.
Having clear oversight of the entire supply chain helps manage risks and respond quickly to problems. Digital dashboards that monitor supplier status and inventory levels double the chances of avoiding interruptions, according to McKinsey. However, only 17% of organizations track suppliers beyond the third tier, showing room for improvement.
Planning for different “what-if” situations allows administrators to prepare for challenges. Although only 37% use scenario planning, it has been effective in reducing supply disruption risk by half. Tools like Supplier Risk Assessment Scorecards help evaluate vendor reliability and potential risks.
Pooling purchasing and sharing logistics between healthcare providers can buffer against supply shocks. Joint procurement and information sharing improve bargaining power, shorten lead times, and distribute stock more fairly during shortages.
Technological advances, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, have become key in improving supply chain resilience.
AI analyzes complex supply chain data in real time, spotting risks before they happen. Predictive analytics forecast demand spikes, supplier delays, or shipping issues, allowing adjustments in ordering. McKinsey reports companies with advanced analytics were 2.5 times more successful in supply-chain planning during COVID-19. For administrators, AI tools help keep supplies flowing with less manual effort.
Automated systems continuously track inventory, supplier performance, and shipment status. These tools reduce human errors and provide instant alerts on shortages or delays. AI-powered monitoring also scores supplier risks, helping organizations prioritize critical vendors and find alternatives when needed.
Front-office processes like supplier communication, order placement, and issue handling are important in supply management. Companies such as Simbo AI offer phone automation and AI answering services that handle routine calls and order confirmations. This reduces administrative workload, speeds problem resolution, and frees staff for other tasks.
Applying AI for front-office automation enhances operational efficiency and supports timely supply interactions.
Modern platforms combine data from inventory systems, logistics, and supplier portals, providing unified dashboards for administrators and IT managers. This integration improves decision-making and responsiveness during disruptions.
Managing AI, analytics, and automation requires skilled staff. Yet, McKinsey found only 10% of surveyed firms feel they have enough in-house digital talent. Many healthcare organizations (68%) are hiring external experts to fill these gaps.
Medical administrators and owners need to plan workforce strategies focused on recruiting and training employees with skills in supply chain technology, data analysis, and AI to leverage digital tools fully.
Efforts to boost resilience must consider operational efficiency. Too much stockpiling or excessive supplier diversification can raise costs and complexity, potentially hampering overall performance. About 71% of companies plan to refine inventory and ordering policies to strike this balance.
Using AI-based forecasting supports maintaining safe stock levels without overspending. Likewise, supplier diversification and regional production should align with cost goals and contract flexibility.
Healthcare administrators and owners in the U.S. face unique factors affecting supply chain plans:
Using AI-driven front-office automation, such as Simbo AI’s services, can improve administrative efficiency and communication with suppliers, aiding timely restocking. Digital dashboards and scenario planning also help prepare for sudden demand or logistic disruptions common in public health emergencies or local crises.
Efforts to strengthen healthcare supply chains in the United States address vulnerabilities like global sourcing challenges, visibility gaps, and lean inventory approaches. Organizations are turning to diversified sourcing, regionalization, strategic stockpiling, and digital tools to reduce risks. Advanced analytics and AI-based automation, including front-office workflow tools from companies like Simbo AI, are changing supply chain management by improving risk detection, communication, and efficiency.
For healthcare administrators, owners, and IT managers, adopting these strategies in procurement and supply chain operations is important for maintaining uninterrupted patient care, controlling costs, and preparing for unexpected disruptions in a changing healthcare environment.
The research aims to equip Texas healthcare organizations with tools and insights to enhance the resilience of their supply chains, focusing on understanding vulnerabilities and developing resilience strategies.
Medical supplies and equipment are categorized into four groups: operational supplies, clinical supplies, durable medical equipment and devices, and biologicals, pharmaceuticals, and nutritional supplies, each with unique supply chain characteristics.
Inherent vulnerabilities include over-reliance on global suppliers, supply chain complexity, lack of transparency, just-in-time inventory practices, and logistical challenges due to global sourcing.
Strategies include prioritizing critical supplies, diversifying supply sources, collaboration among healthcare organizations, what-if scenario planning, and supply network mapping.
The Supplier Risk Assessment Scorecard is a tool to help healthcare organizations evaluate and mitigate risks associated with their suppliers, crucial for maintaining supply chain integrity and reliability.
Finding the right balance between resiliency and efficiency is critical for ensuring a supply chain that is responsive and robust, capable of addressing sudden demands and disruptions.
The global pandemic highlighted the fragility of supply chains, illustrating the need for diversification and better resilience to avoid collapse during crises.
Technology enhances risk management and effective communication, which are essential for ensuring resilience during healthcare crises.
Key takeaways include understanding vulnerabilities, collaborating with stakeholders, implementing proactive problem-solving, and developing customized action plans.
Case studies provide practical examples of how organizations can proactively mitigate risks and prepare for disruptions, reinforcing the importance of robust supply chain strategies.