Patient no-shows happen when patients miss their scheduled medical appointments without telling anyone. This is a common issue in outpatient clinics and care centers in the United States. When patients do not show up, it wastes clinical time and reduces chances for other patients to get care. It also causes financial losses for healthcare providers. A big study from public hospitals in China showed that about 11.1% of patients missed online outpatient appointments. Even though this study is from another country, clinics in the U.S. face similar challenges. This makes the study useful for American healthcare managers trying to find solutions.
No-shows cost a lot in the U.S. healthcare system. When patients do not come, the number of patients seen each day changes a lot. This messes up schedules and makes it hard to manage staff. Missed appointments delay care, upset patients, and make running clinics harder. Because of these problems, healthcare workers want better ways to predict who might miss appointments. This helps them remind patients, reach out, and reschedule when needed.
To predict patient no-shows well, good and complete patient data is very important. Machine learning works best when it has large and varied data that shows many factors affecting if patients come or not. In this case, combining data from many sources is very helpful.
These data sources can include:
A study by researchers at The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley looked at over 382,000 outpatient appointments in public hospitals. They used data from many sources to build machine learning models that predicted who would miss appointments with good accuracy. By combining different types of data, their models worked better than using just one source of information.
Many machine learning methods have been tested to improve predicting no-shows. Some models called ensemble learning, like bagging and random forest, worked better than simple methods like logistic regression or decision trees. The bagging model had a very high accuracy score of 0.990. This means it almost perfectly told who would show up and who would not.
Here is what some of these methods mean:
Older methods like logistic regression and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) had lower accuracy scores of 0.597 and 0.843, respectively. This shows that using different types of data with advanced machine learning gives much better results for finding who might miss appointments.
Medical managers and IT staff in the U.S. can gain a lot by using data-driven systems that predict no-shows well. Good predictions help with:
Healthcare groups working with value-based care models find predicting no-shows useful. It helps improve patients’ follow-through with care and cuts down delays that can be avoided.
Adding AI to healthcare workflows helps clinics manage patient communication and cut down on manual work. AI improves how accurate, consistent, and quick appointment handling can be.
AI systems can send automatic, personalized reminders by phone, email, or text. They learn which way and when is best to reach each patient based on past responses to encourage them to come.
AI phone systems with natural language processing (NLP) can handle patient calls about cancellations or rescheduling. This helps reduce staff work and gives patients quick service, lowering no-shows caused by miscommunication.
AI models use live data to adjust appointment times based on who is likely to miss. This lets clinics fill in free spots caused by late cancellations more easily.
AI tools work smoothly with current EHR systems and automatically get updated patient data. This keeps prediction models accurate with the latest patient information.
Automated dashboards show leaders info about patterns of no-shows, patient types, busy times, and how well schedules work. These reports help decision-making to improve clinic processes over time.
While data integration and AI models have many benefits, healthcare leaders in the U.S. should think about certain things before adopting these tools:
Many U.S. healthcare providers know these challenges but keep moving forward because the long-term benefits help improve how they operate and care for patients.
Health informatics is the field that helps combine, process, and study different types of health data to improve patient care and running clinics. It links clinical work, IT, and data science to give healthcare workers quick and useful information.
Research by Mohd Javaid, Abid Haleem, and Ravi Pratap Singh shows how important health informatics tools are. These tools support easy electronic access to medical records for nurses, doctors, managers, and insurance staff. They help share accurate patient data fast and remove communication problems that may cause missed appointments and running issues.
Good data integration supported by informatics makes sure prediction models get complete data from medical records, communication logs, and population health sources. Using this technology helps no-show predictions become more reliable and supports better care coordination and resource use.
For medical managers, owners, and IT staff in the U.S., using data from many sources with machine learning is a good step to reduce patient no-shows. This approach improves how well clinics predict no-shows, helping them manage appointments better, waste less, and make more money.
Also, AI tools that automate workflows fit well with these prediction systems. They make patient communication, scheduling, and reporting smoother. As healthcare moves towards using more data, combining different types of patient data will remain very important to improving outpatient services in the U.S.
The main objective is to design a prediction model for patient no-shows in online outpatient appointments to assist hospitals in decision-making and reduce the probability of no-show behavior.
The study analyzed a total of 382,004 original online outpatient appointment records.
The study used several algorithms including logistic regression, k-nearest neighbor (KNN), boosting, decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and bagging.
The patient no-show rate for online outpatient appointments was found to be 11.1%.
The bagging model achieved the highest AUC value of 0.990.
Bagging outperformed logistic regression, decision tree, and k-nearest neighbors, which had lower AUC values of 0.597, 0.499, and 0.843, respectively.
The results can provide a decision basis for hospitals to minimize resource waste, develop effective outpatient appointment policies, and optimize operations.
The validation set comprised 95,501 appointment records.
It demonstrates the potential of using data from multiple sources to predict patient no-shows effectively.
The authors include Guorui Fan, Zhaohua Deng, Qing Ye, and Bin Wang from The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.