Value-Based Care (VBC) is meant to make healthcare more efficient and focused on patients. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and private payers want providers to join VBC contracts that sometimes involve two-sided risk. This means providers can earn more if they meet quality targets but may lose money if they miss cost and quality goals.
Right now, only 19.6% of payments under alternative payment models (APMs) have two-sided risk. Even though this number is low, efforts like the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation want all Medicare patients to be in accountable care relationships by 2030. This shows that knowing how to handle VBC contracts is becoming more important.
To successfully manage VBC contracts, it is important to understand three main phases: contract negotiation, performance monitoring, and contract reconciliation.
This phase is the base for a good VBC contract. Providers must check contract details and set clear and possible goals for patient outcomes, quality measures, and money targets. This phase usually includes:
Many providers say they do not have enough skill in contracting, risk management, and financial planning during negotiations. They often feel weaker than payers in talks, which can cause unfair deals. So, administrators and owners need to learn these skills or get help from experts in VBC.
After a contract starts, providers must keep watching how well they meet performance and money goals. This phase includes:
Watching performance closely helps avoid surprise losses. Providers who track contracts well can improve care and save money.
At the end of the contract period, reconciliation makes sure payments are right based on checked performance data:
This step keeps providers and payers working together fairly. It also shows the need for good data management and records throughout the contract.
Managing VBC contracts is part of a bigger system called contract lifecycle management (CLM). CLM covers everything from starting the contract to renewing or ending it. It includes these six steps:
This planned approach helps healthcare groups lower legal risks and work better. The American Bar Association says 60% of business lawsuits involve contracts, showing why proper contract management is needed.
Healthcare managers and IT staff can use special CLM software like Legisway. This software automates many contract tasks, keeps things legal, and tracks performance.
Using artificial intelligence (AI) and automation is changing how VBC contracts are handled, especially in the U.S. where the healthcare and payer rules are complex.
AI tools can look at large amounts of past data much faster than people. These tools test contract terms and money results to help providers pick terms that lower financial risks and improve payment. AI helps plan by guessing possible earnings or losses by year-end under different contract setups.
Collecting and processing performance data is hard without technology. Automated systems connect with Electronic Health Records (EHR) to track quality and saving goals. Automation cuts errors and makes sure reports are on time. Reporting is key to meeting contract rules.
Central dashboards let managers and IT teams see real-time key performance info. This helps them make faster choices to improve patient care and control costs during the contract.
Reconciliation needs comparing data from payers and providers, which can differ because of data errors or different definitions. AI tools can point out mismatches and problems to check. This makes the review faster and more correct.
Automation also helps manage documents needed to back up provider claims, such as patient files or treatment notes.
Healthcare IT leaders should focus on using AI tools and automation to succeed in VBC. Companies like Innovaccer and platforms like Thomson Reuters’ CoCounsel show AI is a current tool for providers, not just something for the future.
Medical practices in the U.S. face special challenges with VBC:
Practice owners and managers must plan well, train staff, and add technology to succeed with VBC.
Tracking the right key performance indicators (KPIs) helps practices stay on track during all phases. Important measures include:
Looking at these KPIs regularly helps managers know when to change contract terms or make changes in operations.
By knowing the phases of value-based care contracts, watching key performance numbers, and using AI and automation, healthcare providers in the U.S. can improve their negotiation and patient care. Good contract management lowers legal and financial risks and helps improve healthcare value overall.
The three crucial phases are contract negotiations, contract performance monitoring, and contract reconciliation. These phases ensure the creation of effective contracts, tracking of care outcomes, and adjustments to achieve value-based care goals.
The slow adoption is driven by regulatory requirements, customer expectations, cost pressures, and the need for providers to restructure their business strategies and risk-sharing agreements to adapt to changing market needs.
Providers report gaps in contracting expertise, risk management, and financial planning, which hinder their success in implementing VBC programs. Many providers feel less equipped compared to payers in navigating VBC challenges.
Technology enables healthcare systems to use advanced analytical tools to model different contract scenarios, simulate financial implications, and assess optimal contract terms, thus strengthening their negotiation position.
Providers should actively track year-end earnings or losses related to VBC contracts by monitoring quality metrics, patient outcomes, and cost efficiencies, using data analytics systems to compare actual performance against predetermined targets.
Contract reconciliation ensures accuracy by comparing payer-reported performance data with the provider’s data, resolving discrepancies to confirm whether performance benchmarks are met and determining financial incentives.
Types of VBC contracts vary widely, including pay-for-reporting, bundled payments, and full capitation arrangements. The choice depends on factors like the type of care delivered and the patient population.
Successful negotiation requires understanding a provider’s capabilities, setting clear patient outcome goals, assessing the infrastructure for data reporting, and being prepared to discuss risk-sharing arrangements and performance metrics.
Providers can enhance contract performance by investing in data analytics systems, regularly monitoring KPIs, identifying variances from projected targets, and making necessary adjustments to improve care quality and cost efficiency.
Healthcare leaders use advanced analytics to access insights on cost, quality, and utilization, allowing them to enhance contract performance, achieve VBC goals, and eliminate uncertainties in their reimbursement processes.