Value-based care changes how healthcare providers get paid. Instead of payment for each service done, providers earn money based on the quality of care and how healthy their patients are. This method aims to improve patient experience, make care fairer, coordinate care better, and cut costs that are not needed.
The American Medical Association (AMA) lists five main goals of value-based care: giving good patient experiences, promoting health fairness, improving health results, keeping costs reasonable, and supporting healthcare workers’ well-being. This means focusing less on how many tests or procedures happen and more on caring for the whole patient.
About 60% of doctors in the U.S. work in practices that take part in Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), a common value-based care model, since 2014. Practices using value-based care see benefits like fewer hospital stays, fewer visits to emergency rooms, and better ways to manage long-term diseases.
For example, Medicare Advantage data shows a 32.1% drop in hospital admissions and an 11.6% drop in emergency visits for patients in value-based care compared to traditional care. These changes help save money—$11 billion was saved in 2023 alone, which was then used to help patients.
Value-based care also helps providers financially. Doctors in these programs can make up to 241% more than those under fee-for-service payment, giving them more financial stability and a reason to improve patient care.
Success in value-based care needs more than clinical changes. Healthcare providers must also negotiate contracts with insurance companies in ways that fit new payment models. Payer contracts are legal agreements that set payment rates, billing rules, and care conditions.
In the past, these talks mostly focused on fee-for-service payments. But now, as value-based contracts grow, providers must negotiate smartly to build partnerships instead of simple deals. Experts like Rick Goddard of Lumeris say successful payer and provider relationships require honesty, trust, and shared goals for long-term success.
Providers should develop a “payvider” skillset, which means combining clinical knowledge with business and financial skills like those used by payers. This includes understanding:
Knowing both sides helps providers make better deals and match clinical goals with payer priorities like lowering medical loss rates and improving ratings for Medicare Advantage plans.
Data transparency is important for good payer partnerships. When both sides share clear and timely data, they can track performance, find problems, and fix them. Sharing data supports teamwork and better care.
Medical practice leaders and IT managers should build systems for regular, organized data sharing. They must also review contracts often to check if they meet performance and compliance goals before renewing. Using strong data helps negotiate better terms and prices.
To negotiate well with payers, these steps help:
Raj Bhatnagar, an expert on payer deals, says this approach helps keep finances stable, not just get quick gains.
Many Medicaid payers and state agencies now include health equity in value-based payments. These models require meeting health fairness goals and encourage lowering disparities for underserved groups. They often support safety-net providers like federally qualified health centers with money and technical help.
Efforts to improve health equity focus on involving communities, adjusting for social risks, and collecting complete data on demographics and social needs. Partnerships between payers and providers, such as community advisory groups, help make contract rules fit patient and community needs.
Population health management is key to value-based care. It means taking care of patient groups by focusing on preventing illness, managing chronic diseases, and coordinating care across providers and settings.
IT managers and clinical leaders work together to set up systems that support these efforts using:
The goal is to provide care that is cost-effective and focuses on patients’ needs while improving health on a larger scale.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMS Innovation Center) has helped test and improve alternative payment methods over 15 years. These methods aim for better quality, cost control, and more patient access.
The Innovation Center focuses on three main ideas:
These goals match value-based care by pushing providers and payers to work on prevention, care coordination, and payment systems that reward good care over quantity. Making rules simpler, like using standard quality measures, lowers the workload for providers working with many payers.
AI tools can analyze large amounts of data to find patterns in patient health and care outcomes. For example, companies like ForeSee Medical use AI and natural language processing to help with proper coding needed for risk-based payments. Correct coding makes sure providers get fair pay for patients with complex needs under value-based models.
Automation helps remind providers about contract renewals, track compliance, and review performance. This reduces paperwork and helps avoid missed deadlines for contract talks.
AI-driven patient engagement tools monitor if patients follow care plans, find those who need contact, and support care coordination. This helps improve outcomes that affect payments under value-based contracts.
Automation allows payers and providers to share data in real time, which helps track performance and build trust. Systems that combine data from many sources—electronic health records, claims, social factors—help practices understand their patients better and customize care.
Healthcare organizations in the U.S. need clear plans and investments in staff, technology, and processes to keep up with these changes.
Paying attention to these areas helps medical practices in the U.S. succeed in changing healthcare payment systems, aiming for better patient care and stable finances.
Changing healthcare practices to fit value-based care and stronger payer partnerships needs a full approach. Using good data, strong negotiation skills, health fairness efforts, and technology helps medical administrators and IT staff handle today’s healthcare challenges well.
Payer contracts are agreements between healthcare providers and insurance companies outlining the terms of patient care reimbursement, including specified reimbursement rates and conditions.
Effective negotiation ensures increased revenue, better reimbursement rates, and enhanced provider autonomy, enabling a greater focus on patient care and service innovation.
Performance metrics and financial data serve as objective evidence to strengthen the healthcare provider’s bargaining position during negotiations.
Practices should clearly define and communicate unique benefits they offer, such as specialized services or high patient satisfaction rates, justifying better contract terms.
Providers should gather comprehensive data, conduct regular contract reviews, build strong relationships with payers, and employ a thorough checklist for negotiations.
Negotiating carve-outs or exclusions allows practices to command higher fees for specific services where they demonstrate efficiency or unique treatment options.
Proactively prepare by reviewing contractual obligations met and exceeded metrics before the renewal date to justify better terms or rate increases.
Negotiating terms that allow for adjustments based on changes in practice or the broader healthcare environment is crucial to maintaining operational efficiency.
Involving legal expertise ensures the contract details are favorable, compliant with regulations, and protects against potential unfavorable clauses during major transitions.
By adopting value-based care models and expanding through strategic partnerships, practices can improve bargaining power and access better contracts with payers.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
