Algorithmic bias happens when AI systems give results that unfairly help or hurt certain groups of people. In healthcare, this means some patients might get wrong diagnoses, worse treatment advice, or poor resource distribution because the data used is not balanced.
There are different kinds of bias in healthcare AI models:
Also, temporal bias happens when things change over time, like medical methods or diseases. If AI is not updated often, it might become less useful or less fair.
A review of 253 studies about AI ethics in healthcare from 2000 to 2020 shows concerns about data privacy, fairness, openness, and keeping humans in control. To deal with this, experts created the SHIFT framework, which means:
This framework guides AI creators and healthcare leaders to use AI in ways that respect ethical rules important to patient care.
Healthcare leaders and IT managers need to use different methods to reduce bias and make patient care fairer:
AI relies on the data it learns from. The data must include all patient groups well. To do this, developers should:
Data quality also means checking that patient outcomes are recorded correctly to avoid mistakes in AI predictions.
Choosing the right fairness measures is important. For example, some AI tools focus on finding all patients with a disease, so avoiding missed diagnoses is key. Others may try to balance errors equally among groups.
Common fairness measures include:
Balancing accuracy and fairness helps prevent AI from making health inequalities worse.
AI models may become less accurate over time because of changes in health or medical practices. It is important to keep checking for data drift and bias regularly. Updating and retraining the AI helps keep it fair and accurate.
Reducing bias is not only the job of AI creators. Healthcare organizations should set rules and teams to support ethical AI use. This includes investing in good data systems, protecting privacy, and working with ethicists, data scientists, doctors, and patient representatives. Training healthcare workers about AI’s limits and strengths is also important to maintain trust and ensure proper use.
Besides helping with clinical decisions, AI is also used to automate office tasks like answering phones and scheduling. This can:
Still, fairness is needed here too. For example:
Responsible AI use means thinking about fairness along with efficiency.
Doctors must understand how AI makes decisions. This helps them spot possible errors or bias and make smart choices. Transparency builds trust for both medical workers and patients.
AI should help, not replace, doctors. Humans must stay in charge to keep patient care safe and respectful. Important decisions should always include a qualified healthcare professional.
Healthcare in the United States serves many different kinds of patients and institutions. AI must work well in rural hospitals, city clinics, and specialty centers alike.
Privacy laws like HIPAA add rules about patient data use and sharing. Handling these rules while keeping AI open and fair is difficult but important.
U.S. healthcare has racial and economic gaps. If AI does not include these factors, it can make these gaps worse. Healthcare leaders in the U.S. should work with AI companies that focus on responsible AI and use ethical models like SHIFT. They should also support ongoing reviews of AI ethics.
To fight AI bias and support fairness, healthcare groups should focus on:
These steps improve AI fairness and make healthcare better and more efficient.
Research shows fairness in healthcare AI is an ongoing problem that needs changing solutions. Future work should build better governance, tools to find bias, clear ways to explain AI, and designs that include all people.
Keeping evaluation ongoing and involving many voices will help AI fit real medical needs and support fair health results.
By learning about and fixing algorithmic bias, healthcare leaders and IT managers in the U.S. can use AI carefully. This reduces unfair care and helps improve patient treatment and work processes.
The core ethical concerns include data privacy, algorithmic bias, fairness, transparency, inclusiveness, and ensuring human-centeredness in AI systems to prevent harm and maintain trust in healthcare delivery.
The study reviewed 253 articles published between 2000 and 2020, using the PRISMA approach for systematic review and meta-analysis, coupled with a hermeneutic approach to synthesize themes and knowledge.
SHIFT stands for Sustainability, Human centeredness, Inclusiveness, Fairness, and Transparency, guiding AI developers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers toward ethical and responsible AI deployment.
Human centeredness ensures that AI technologies prioritize patient wellbeing, respect autonomy, and support healthcare professionals, keeping humans at the core of AI decision-making rather than replacing them.
Inclusiveness addresses the need to consider diverse populations to avoid biased AI outcomes, ensuring equitable healthcare access and treatment across different demographic, ethnic, and social groups.
Transparency facilitates trust by making AI algorithms’ workings understandable to users and stakeholders, allowing detection and correction of bias, and ensuring accountability in healthcare decisions.
Sustainability relates to developing AI solutions that are resource-efficient, maintain long-term effectiveness, and are adaptable to evolving healthcare needs without exacerbating inequalities or resource depletion.
Bias can lead to unfair treatment and health disparities. Addressing it requires diverse data sets, inclusive algorithm design, regular audits, and continuous stakeholder engagement to ensure fairness.
Investments are needed for data infrastructure that protects privacy, development of ethical AI frameworks, training healthcare professionals, and fostering multi-disciplinary collaborations that drive innovation responsibly.
Future research should focus on advancing governance models, refining ethical frameworks like SHIFT, exploring scalable transparency practices, and developing tools for bias detection and mitigation in clinical AI systems.