Algorithmic bias in healthcare AI means errors or unfair results caused by prejudices built into AI models. These biases often happen because the data used to train AI does not represent all types of patients. In the United States, where people differ by race, income, location, and health, these biases can cause unfair treatment.
Matthew G. Hanna and his team say bias in AI and machine learning can come from three main places:
Because of these biases, AI may support diagnosis and treatment differently. For example, an AI trained mostly on urban hospital data may not work well in rural clinics. This could cause wrong diagnoses, delays in care, or missed symptoms, which makes healthcare less fair.
The best way to reduce algorithmic bias is to use diverse and inclusive data. This means data should come from many groups of people with different backgrounds, places, and health situations. Diverse data helps AI work well for all kinds of patients.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. need to gather data from underserved people, such as those in rural areas, minorities, and low-income communities. Studies show that if data does not include enough rural healthcare information, AI models do not perform well there. This is a problem because many Americans live in such places and use small healthcare centers.
Spending money to collect data from diverse groups helps make AI fairer. It also means working with various healthcare providers, public health groups, and local communities to get a wide range of health information. Healthcare leaders can work with regional data exchanges and state Medicaid programs to get more data.
Also, data must be kept up to date. Changes in diseases, medical procedures, or technology can make old data less useful. Regular updates of data help keep AI accurate and useful over time.
Making good and fair AI in healthcare needs ongoing work with many people, like doctors, patients, data experts, and policymakers. Involving these groups helps AI tools meet real needs, protect patient privacy, and stay clear about how they work.
Healthcare managers and IT staff should create ways to get feedback from workers and patients regularly. Doctors can share whether AI results match real medical guidelines. Patients and community members can talk about how AI affects their access to care and privacy.
Keeping these groups involved also helps make AI workings clear. The SHIFT framework by Haytham Siala, Yichuan Wang, and others suggests responsible AI should have Sustainability, Human centeredness, Inclusiveness, Fairness, and Transparency. Transparency means people can understand how AI makes decisions and find mistakes or biases early.
Managers should do regular ethical reviews and bias checks for AI. This means having teams inside the organization or outside experts watch AI results to find bias or errors. If bias is found, the AI can be changed or retrained quickly.
Policymakers also have a big role. They can set rules that require diverse AI training data, regular bias checks, and patient protections. Working with government agencies like the FDA or HHS helps keep AI safe and legal.
Algorithmic bias can cause many problems in healthcare:
AI can be very helpful, but it must be carefully designed to avoid these risks. The United States needs responsible AI more than ever as technology grows in healthcare.
Besides clinical AI, healthcare also uses AI to improve office tasks. For example, AI can answer phone calls and help manage patient appointments and referrals. Companies like Simbo AI make phone systems that help offices handle calls better and reduce staff work.
Using AI phone systems can:
But, this AI must be fair and inclusive. For example, voice recognition should understand different accents and dialects common in the U.S., especially in immigrant communities. If the system cannot understand someone, it may upset patients or block access to care.
Getting feedback from users helps improve these systems. Managers and IT teams should work with AI providers to check how well the system works and update it based on who uses it and how.
These AI tools must also follow healthcare rules like HIPAA to protect patient information. It is important to be clear about how calls are recorded and used to keep trust.
The SHIFT framework by Haytham Siala and Yichuan Wang gives practical guidance to balance AI benefits and ethics:
Healthcare groups in the U.S. can use SHIFT as a checklist when they choose or build AI, especially for patient communication and clinical decisions.
Besides fixing bias and using diverse data, healthcare AI must follow ethical and legal rules. Ethical issues include keeping patient control, getting their consent for AI use, and making sure someone is responsible if AI causes harm.
Managers and IT staff should work with legal experts to create rules about:
Adding these steps helps healthcare groups avoid legal problems and keep public trust in new technology.
For healthcare leaders who want to reduce algorithmic bias and use AI fairly, these steps help:
Using these steps, healthcare organizations in the United States can use AI not only to work better but also to offer fair and equal care.
Artificial intelligence has the potential to change healthcare in the United States. But this depends on balancing technology with ethical responsibility. Addressing algorithmic bias by using diverse data and involving stakeholders regularly helps make sure AI benefits all patients and supports healthcare workers in giving good care.
The core ethical concerns include data privacy, algorithmic bias, fairness, transparency, inclusiveness, and ensuring human-centeredness in AI systems to prevent harm and maintain trust in healthcare delivery.
The study reviewed 253 articles published between 2000 and 2020, using the PRISMA approach for systematic review and meta-analysis, coupled with a hermeneutic approach to synthesize themes and knowledge.
SHIFT stands for Sustainability, Human centeredness, Inclusiveness, Fairness, and Transparency, guiding AI developers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers toward ethical and responsible AI deployment.
Human centeredness ensures that AI technologies prioritize patient wellbeing, respect autonomy, and support healthcare professionals, keeping humans at the core of AI decision-making rather than replacing them.
Inclusiveness addresses the need to consider diverse populations to avoid biased AI outcomes, ensuring equitable healthcare access and treatment across different demographic, ethnic, and social groups.
Transparency facilitates trust by making AI algorithms’ workings understandable to users and stakeholders, allowing detection and correction of bias, and ensuring accountability in healthcare decisions.
Sustainability relates to developing AI solutions that are resource-efficient, maintain long-term effectiveness, and are adaptable to evolving healthcare needs without exacerbating inequalities or resource depletion.
Bias can lead to unfair treatment and health disparities. Addressing it requires diverse data sets, inclusive algorithm design, regular audits, and continuous stakeholder engagement to ensure fairness.
Investments are needed for data infrastructure that protects privacy, development of ethical AI frameworks, training healthcare professionals, and fostering multi-disciplinary collaborations that drive innovation responsibly.
Future research should focus on advancing governance models, refining ethical frameworks like SHIFT, exploring scalable transparency practices, and developing tools for bias detection and mitigation in clinical AI systems.