AI systems, like machine learning models, need data to work. In healthcare, this data can come from health records, images, and patient details. But if the data used is limited or does not represent all types of patients, bias can happen. This bias changes the AI’s decisions and recommendations. It can cause wrong diagnoses, wrong treatments, or unfair care for some groups of people.
Bias in healthcare AI usually falls into three types:
A study by Matthew G. Hanna and his team in Modern Pathology (March 2025) says it is very important to check for bias at all stages of AI development. If bias is ignored, it can cause unfair treatment and even harm patient safety. For example, biased AI systems might give wrong information or treat some groups unfairly.
Health differences among groups in the United States have lasted a long time and are well known. Black, Latino, Native American, and rural people often get less care, worse treatment, and have poorer health outcomes. When AI is added to healthcare, these problems can get worse if not handled carefully.
One big worry is that AI tools that are trained mostly on data from cities or majority groups may not work well for smaller or different groups. If AI is not trained on good, diverse data, it could make unfair decisions seem fair. This is a problem because many healthcare choices, like treatments and risks, depend on AI.
Healthcare leaders, like managers and facility owners, need to make sure AI uses data from many different groups. They should keep updating AI models with new and complete data to avoid bias from changes over time. AI tools must be tested often in real settings to make sure they work well for everyone.
Besides technical bias, there are ethics concerns like telling patients about AI, getting their permission, and being responsible for AI decisions. A European Commission report said 53% of patients felt better if they were told about AI and agreed to its use before it was used in their care. Many people feel unsure or don’t trust AI in health decisions.
In the US, it is important to be open and clear with patients about using AI. There should be rules based on trust, fairness, clarity, and responsibility. Deepak Patil, MBA, says less than 10% of healthcare groups have strong AI programs because they lack good governance. One example is the IBM Watson for Oncology project, which failed because of poor oversight and data quality.
Healthcare managers should build strong systems to oversee AI. These should include regular bias checks, matching AI results to clinical standards, involving patients and staff in decisions, and clear rules about who answers for AI outcomes. Teams with various experts working together avoid isolated AI projects and help make sure AI is fair and ethical.
Measuring the return on investment (ROI) of AI in healthcare is not easy. Spencer Dorn explains that the value of AI depends on what it is used for, who uses it, and where it is used. AI usually does not improve every workflow the same way. Some important tasks are hard to automate. Also, the US payment system rewards more services, which may conflict with AI’s goal to improve efficiency.
A survey of 233 US health leaders found 88% use AI to some degree, but only 18% have strong AI governance. Many groups use AI in different departments without coordination, which increases risks of bias and mistakes.
Rajeev Ronanki notes that less than 2% of high-demand healthcare tasks, like paperwork and claims processing, are automated. Still, 69% of healthcare workers want AI tools that save time instead of replacing people. The future of AI in healthcare will likely involve agents that work alongside humans, remember things, explain their actions, and adapt.
AI has shown good results in helping with front-office work, such as answering phones and doing administrative tasks. AI tools can schedule appointments, answer common questions, gather patient information, and send reminders without making staff too busy. Simbo AI is a company that uses AI for phone work in healthcare offices.
These AI tools can lower the burden on staff, let them focus on harder work, and reduce wait and no-show times. This can help patients be more satisfied. Researchers like Bimal Desai, MD, from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia say AI tools that help write messages reduce the workload for staff. But results can vary depending on the task and place.
Because patient intake and communication involve private information and feelings, healthcare managers must be careful with AI. It must respect privacy, get patient permission, and be clear to keep trust. Simbo AI shows how specific AI tools can help in non-medical but important tasks to improve healthcare.
To stop bias and support fairness in healthcare AI, US organizations can try these steps:
Healthcare managers, owners, and IT staff have important roles in adding AI to their organizations. They should pick AI tools that improve work but also keep care fair, safe, and trustworthy.
Knowing the types and sources of AI bias and working continuously to reduce them is key. Rules that support openness and responsibility help avoid past failures and build trust. AI tools for front-office work, like those from Simbo AI, offer useful help but need careful use to protect patient privacy and choices.
The future benefit of AI in US healthcare depends on solving bias and fairness problems now. If done well, AI can help all patients fairly and support staff in giving good care without making old problems worse.
Organizations must evaluate specific AI tool benefits relative to roles and settings. For instance, AI auto-drafting for administrative messages proves more effective than for medical advice. Use-case and user-specific performance data is essential for aligning investment with actual clinical benefit to maximize ROI.
ROI measurement is complicated by varied perspectives on cost and benefit, unclear payers, differing time horizons, baselines, and evaluation metrics. Additionally, AI’s unreliability in critical areas, modest productivity gains, downstream workflow constraints, and fee-for-service misalignments hinder straightforward ROI assessment.
Trust, fairness (equity), transparency, and accountability are fundamental. This involves rigorous validation, bias assessments, clear documentation, stakeholder engagement, ongoing monitoring, and assigning responsibility for AI outcomes to ensure safe and ethical AI deployment.
Failures typically stem from lack of trust due to opaque algorithms or bias, insufficient strategic leadership, poor data quality, and regulatory uncertainties. Weak governance structures lead to flawed algorithms, loss of trust, and abandonment of AI solutions.
AI enables predictive analytics to foresee patient risks, personalize treatment plans, optimize resource allocation, and reduce unnecessary tests, leading to improved outcomes, fewer hospital stays, and decreased wasteful spending, thereby driving cost savings.
Patients often feel uncomfortable with AI use due to concerns over autonomy, informed consent, and insufficient understanding of AI’s role. Transparent communication and clear consent processes are essential to build patient trust and acceptance.
AI trained on geographically or demographically limited data risks discriminatory outputs and exacerbating health disparities. Addressing diversity in data and ensuring equitable AI performance is crucial to prevent a digital divide and promote fair healthcare access.
AI Evals involve monitoring AI performance in production with guardrails, enabling real-world learning on specific data. They ensure AI’s reliability, safety, and suitability in the high-stakes clinical environment, which is critical for successful AI adoption and ROI realization.
With multiple departments experimenting independently, AI risks bias, errors, and workflow disruptions. Inclusive governance ensures aligned policies, data use oversight, risk management, and comprehensive stakeholder involvement to safeguard AI benefits and mitigate harms.
Leaders should align AI tools with workforce needs, prioritize deploying trusted teammates rather than disruptive tools, invest in professional training, ensure data interoperability, implement governance frameworks emphasizing transparency and accountability, and focus on human-centered AI supporting clinician decision-making.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
