In 2024, the healthcare integration market in North America held more than 41.5% of the global share, showing widespread use of electronic health records (EHRs) and pressure to connect various healthcare data systems. However, many still use legacy systems, which complicates these efforts. A 2021 HIMSS survey found that about 73% of healthcare providers rely on legacy platforms, some dating back decades.
Legacy systems such as older EHRs, laboratory information systems (LIS), radiology information systems (RIS), and hospital information systems (HIS) often cannot communicate well with newer interoperability standards or APIs. This leads to scattered patient records, higher chances of medical mistakes, and inefficiencies in administration. These issues affect medium to large practices and hospital-affiliated outpatient clinics, where upgrading can be costly and disrupt workflows.
One study showed that annual operating and maintenance costs for some legacy systems can reach around $337 million, highlighting the financial burden of keeping old technology functional. These systems were not built to handle modern data exchange, which causes duplicate or inaccurate patient data and makes clinical decisions harder.
U.S. regulations like the 21st Century Cures Act and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT’s Cures Act Final Rule emphasize open APIs and adopting Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standards. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) support these moves and promote better data sharing. Still, many providers struggle to implement these changes, especially with legacy systems that don’t support standardized exchanges.
Modernizing healthcare IT environments requires balancing clinical service continuity with adopting interoperable platforms. Several approaches can aid this process.
Middleware can function as translators between legacy and modern systems. They enable data exchange by bridging incompatible formats and protocols. Enterprise Integration Platform as a Service (EiPaaS) offers scalable API management for real-time interoperability.
For example, platforms like Vorro’s BridgeGateHealth provide no-code middleware that converts legacy data into standardized FHIR formats, lowering the demand on internal IT teams. This helps practices with staffing shortages or budget limits integrate more easily.
Using API-first architectures and scalable middleware allows organizations to avoid full system replacements at once, supporting gradual modernization.
A step-by-step migration reduces risks and keeps clinical workflows stable. This approach involves assessing legacy systems, defining integration goals, and implementing changes in phases. A hospital in California migrated to Epic using phased data purification, mapping, and validation, limiting downtime.
Incremental upgrades can include wrapping legacy applications with APIs for new system interaction or rehosting legacy platforms on cloud infrastructure to improve scalability without changing the core software immediately.
Following standards such as HL7 and FHIR is essential. These guidelines define how patient data should be structured and exchanged to ensure accuracy and compatibility.
Proper FHIR implementation requires training and vendor support. Success stories, like Epic’s integration, highlight the importance of user education and solid technical support in easing adoption.
Administrators should manage resistance by involving staff early on, explaining the benefits clearly, and offering thorough training. Using intuitive interfaces and mentorship can help staff with various levels of digital skills adapt to new systems.
Resistance can considerably slow down efforts to improve operations and patient care.
Upgrading legacy setups must improve cybersecurity. With rising cyberattacks, organizations need to integrate encryption, multi-factor authentication, and regular security audits into their systems.
Cloud backups and scalable security solutions offer protection and ensure sensitive data remains safe during and after modernization.
Beyond basic interoperability, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and workflow automation contribute to better data accuracy, lower clinician workload, and smoother care processes.
AI speeds up data processing by spotting inconsistencies, flagging duplicates, and verifying patient records automatically. This lowers errors from manual entry or legacy system flaws.
Machine learning can automate semantic mapping to convert legacy data into FHIR-compliant formats, simplifying integration.
AI tools support clinical workflows by helping physicians document patient visits accurately, saving time and improving records.
They also provide predictive insights, such as warning of medication interactions or care gaps, possible only when data flows accurately between systems.
Practice owners and administrators benefit from AI automation tools for front-office tasks. For instance, Simbo AI offers phone automation and answering services, helping manage patient calls without needing large administrative teams.
Automating scheduling and patient inquiries reduces wait times, frees staff for complex tasks, and improves patient experience.
Manual data management and interoperability issues increase clinician fatigue. AI and no-code platforms, like those from Vorro, allow healthcare staff to interact with integrated systems easily. This reduces mental strain and shifts focus toward patient care.
By 2025, AI-powered, API-first platforms are expected to make automated integration a standard, lowering technical demands and supporting better health outcomes.
For administrators, owners, and IT managers in the U.S., bridging legacy systems and modern technologies requires careful planning. It involves incremental upgrades, adopting middleware, following standards like HL7 FHIR, and improving cybersecurity.
Incorporating AI and workflow automation also helps improve clinical accuracy, efficiency, and reduce administrative work.
With regulatory focus and market growth—projected healthcare integration market growth at 9.7% CAGR through 2034—those who adopt scalable, thoughtful integration methods will be better prepared to improve patient care, streamline processes, and maintain compliance in a complex healthcare environment.
The healthcare integration market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 9.7%, reaching around US$ 8.3 billion by 2034, up from US$ 3.3 billion in 2024.
The increasing complexity in healthcare delivery necessitates seamless integration to unify disparate systems, improve data interoperability, and enhance patient outcomes.
The interface/integration engines segment led the market with a 48.7% share due to its vital role in enabling seamless data exchange.
Key services include implementation & integration, consulting, support & maintenance, and training & education, with implementation & integration holding a share of 52.3%.
Hospitals dominate the market, accounting for 55.6% of revenue as they adopt integrated systems to enhance patient care and operational efficiency.
Complex interoperability challenges and persistent data silos hinder growth, as many healthcare organizations use legacy systems that do not communicate effectively.
The expansion of telehealth and remote patient monitoring services presents significant growth opportunities as they require integration of diverse data streams.
Macroeconomic conditions affect healthcare IT budgets, directly impacting organizations’ capacity to fund integration projects, with economic growth encouraging investment.
The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard is gaining traction for improving data exchange, as it is compatible with modern web technologies and easier to implement.
North America leads the market with a 41.5% share, driven by initiatives aimed at enhancing interoperability and the high adoption rate of electronic health records.