Multiple digital health tools have shown good results in improving patient care, mental health, and managing chronic diseases. For example, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs) work well for mental health problems. These can be done with a therapist or on your own. According to the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), therapist-supported programs have fewer dropouts than self-guided ones. This shows that human help is important to keep patients involved.
Even with these advances, it is still hard to keep people engaged for a long time. Several reasons make this difficult:
Healthcare leaders, clinic owners, and IT managers in the U.S. notice these problems as missed patient follow-ups, incomplete treatment, and little use of digital tools, even after big investments. The challenge is not only to create good digital health tools but also to keep using them smoothly in daily healthcare.
One way to tackle long-term engagement problems is using microinterventions. These are short, focused actions or messages meant to create small behavior changes over time. Instead of one big intervention, microinterventions offer small steps regularly. They help patients build healthy habits and stay connected to their care.
Some points about microinterventions are:
For healthcare managers, adding microinterventions to digital tools can help improve patient follow-through and lower dropouts. JMIR points out that flexible, repeated microinterventions could improve mental health and chronic disease care on a larger scale, but more work is needed to connect them into longer plans.
Digital health literacy means having the skills to find, understand, and use digital health information well. Both patients and healthcare workers need these skills to make digital tools work. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) is a tool made to check these skills, which is very important for patients dealing with complex health issues.
Improving digital health literacy in medical settings helps:
Training patients and staff in digital health skills can remove barriers to staying engaged long term and lead to better health. In the U.S., where many people have different levels of digital skills, this is important for fair healthcare delivery.
Using AI and digital tools in health brings up important ethical and policy questions. JMIR says that being clear and responsible is very important when using AI in health care. The idea of a “right to explanation” means patients should be told how AI affects their care.
For healthcare managers, handling AI ethics means:
Including these steps in digital health programs helps build trust with patients. Trust is needed to get patients to accept and use new technology.
AI and workflow automation can change how healthcare groups keep patients involved. Practices that use AI-driven phone systems, like Simbo AI, can improve communication, reduce work for staff, and make sure patient follow-ups happen on time.
Some benefits for medical admins and IT leaders include:
Using AI workflow automation helps healthcare providers in the U.S. handle many patients and limited resources. It supports steady, accurate communication that fits different patient needs, making long-term use of digital health tools better.
As digital health tools become more common, U.S. medical managers and practice owners must make key decisions about using and maintaining them. To solve engagement problems, some key steps are:
These ideas help get the most out of digital health investments and improve patient happiness and results in a digital healthcare world.
Research on microinterventions and AI in healthcare will keep changing how U.S. providers keep patients involved. The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) continues to provide studies and evidence about good design and ethical use of digital health tools.
Future progress might include:
By understanding long-term engagement issues and using microinterventions with AI and workflow automation, U.S. healthcare systems can help patients better in today’s digital world. Medical managers and IT teams have an important job in using these methods to keep patients making healthy changes and to improve digital health across their practices.
JMIR is a leading, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on digital medicine and health care technologies. It ranks highly in Medical Informatics and Health Care Sciences, making it a significant source for research on emerging digital health innovations, including public mental health interventions.
JMIR provides open access to research that includes applied science on digital health tools, which allied health professionals can use for patient education, prevention, and clinical care, thus enhancing access to current evidence-based mental health interventions.
The journal covers Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs), including therapist-assisted and self-guided formats, highlighting their cost-effectiveness and use in treating various mental health disorders with attention to engagement and adherence.
Therapist-assisted iCBTs have lower dropout rates compared to self-guided ones, indicating that therapist involvement supports engagement and adherence, which is crucial for effective public mental health intervention delivery.
Long-term engagement remains challenging, with research suggesting microinterventions as a way to provide flexible, short, and meaningful behavior changes. However, integrating multiple microinterventions into coherent narratives over time needs further exploration.
Digital health literacy is essential for patients and providers to effectively utilize online resources. Tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) help assess these skills to tailor interventions and ensure access and understanding.
Biofeedback systems show promise in improving psychological well-being and mental health among workers, although current evidence often comes from controlled settings, limiting generalizability for workplace public mental health initiatives.
AI integration offers potential improvements in decision-making and patient care but raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the right to explanation, affecting ethical delivery of digital mental health services.
Barriers include maintaining patient engagement, ensuring adequate therapist involvement, digital literacy limitations, and navigating complex legal and ethical frameworks around new technologies like AI.
JMIR encourages open science, patient participation as peer reviewers, and publication of protocols before data collection, supporting collaborative and transparent research that can inform more accessible mental health interventions for allied health professionals.