A big part of whether patients trust healthcare communication is how much they feel the provider cares and understands their feelings. Studies in cancer care show interesting results when patients get answers from AI chatbots versus doctors.
David Chen and his team at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre studied 45 cancer patients. Most were older white men with some college education. They compared how patients felt about empathy in answers from AI chatbots (Claude V1, V2, and an improved Claude V2 with special prompts) and human doctors. The patients gave higher empathy scores to AI chatbots than to doctors. Claude V2 with the special prompts got an average empathy score of 4.11 out of 5. Doctors’ answers scored 2.01.
This shows some patients might care more about things like tone, length, and clear language. AI chatbots write longer and clearer answers because they don’t get stressed or rushed like doctors. But this empathy is based on recognizing emotional cues and programmed language, not real feelings like a human doctor has.
These results show some promise for AI in talking with patients but also have limits. The study group was mostly older, educated white men. Other groups with different races, ages, or incomes might see AI differently. More research with diverse groups is needed.
Looking at patient characteristics helps medical offices know who might accept AI tools like chatbots for scheduling or answering calls.
A 2022 Pew Research Center survey asked over 11,000 U.S. adults about AI in healthcare. About 60% said they would feel uncomfortable if their doctor used AI to diagnose or treat them. But feelings differed by age, gender, and education:
Still, 57% thought AI would hurt patient-doctor relationships by making them less personal. Only 13% felt AI would improve those relationships. Many people worried about data security, with 37% fearing their health info could be at risk.
Medical offices should think about their patients’ ages, genders, and tech skills before adding AI chatbots. Older adults or people less used to technology might resist AI communication more.
Trust in AI also depends on doctors, not just patients. A study of doctors working in gastroenterology in Saudi Arabia—lessons that also apply to the U.S.—found doctor support for AI depends on factors like age, gender, specialty, experience, and work setting.
Doctors already comfortable with AI tools and those who had started using AI tended to have more positive views. Others worried about AI replacing doctors or doubted AI’s reliability, which made them skeptical.
In the U.S., this means medical leaders must train and talk with doctors when adding AI phone systems. Getting doctors on board helps build trust with staff and patients and makes AI adoption smoother.
AI chatbot technology keeps improving. One new method called chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting helps the AI think in steps before giving answers. Claude V2 with this method got the highest empathy ratings from patients compared to older chatbots.
Healthcare managers should understand these technical differences when choosing chatbots. Advanced prompting techniques might help chatbots give more thoughtful and empathetic answers that feel better to patients.
Still, chatbots don’t actually feel emotions. Their “empathy” is based on copying language from many health conversations. So, chatbot answers should be supervised by healthcare staff, especially for sensitive issues, to avoid wrong or harmful advice.
Front-office phone systems are important in medical offices for helping patients and keeping things running smoothly. AI chatbots can answer calls 24/7, schedule or cancel appointments, and do basic medical triage.
For U.S. medical administrators and IT staff, using AI chatbots in phones can offer benefits:
But trust must be kept. Many patients still want to talk to a real person, especially for complicated or private concerns.
Older patients may find technology harder to use, so easy options to speak to staff are important. In communities with many languages and cultures, chatbots should use language that fits patients’ backgrounds.
It is also vital to follow HIPAA rules and keep patient information private when using AI.
Medical leaders have to add AI in ways that fit patient needs and keep trust strong.
Using AI in healthcare raises important ethical questions. Patients worry about data privacy, wrong information, and bias in AI systems.
In the U.S., AI tools must follow HIPAA rules. Patients should give informed consent when interacting with chatbots.
Research shows many AI studies focus mostly on certain groups. If AI is trained mostly on data from specific races or income levels, it may increase health gaps for others.
Medical offices should choose AI vendors that work to reduce bias and check AI outputs regularly.
Right now, AI chatbots are mainly used for things like scheduling and answering common questions. Their role in direct medical advice is still careful and cautious.
Studies suggest AI responses that seem caring can help patient engagement when used the right way. As AI improves in understanding language and emotions, chatbots might help doctors someday.
For U.S. medical leaders and IT staff, smart AI use means thinking about patient backgrounds, ethics, and how patients like to communicate. AI phone automation can reduce work and help offices run better, but must still keep human contact that patients want.
Patient trust in AI chatbots compared to human doctors changes based on age, gender, education, and culture. Cancer patients in one study, mainly older white men, rated AI chatbots as more caring than doctors, but this may not apply to all U.S. patients.
Knowing how different groups feel helps U.S. medical offices use AI wisely. AI chatbots for front-office calls can improve work, but must be combined with human care and good communication to keep trust. Privacy, fairness, and honesty remain very important as AI becomes part of patient care communication.
The study evaluates how patients perceive empathy in responses to cancer-related questions from artificial intelligence chatbots compared to physicians.
Patients rated chatbot responses as more empathetic than those from physicians, suggesting different perceptions of empathy.
Techniques such as integrating emotional intelligence, multi-step processing of emotional dialogue, and chain-of-thought prompting enhance the empathetic responses of chatbots.
Empathy is essential for building trust in patient-provider relationships and is linked to improved patient outcomes.
The study surveyed 45 oncology patients, primarily white males aged over 65, with a significant proportion being well-educated.
Chatbot responses had a higher average word count than physician responses, which may influence perceptions of empathy.
Limitations include a biased demographic, single-time point interactions, and the potential difference in empathy perception between written and real-world interactions.
Chatbots utilize recognition of user emotions followed by integration of appropriate emotions in their responses to enhance empathy.
Concerns include safeguarding patient privacy, ensuring informed consent, oversight of AI-generated outputs, and promoting health equity.
Future research is essential for optimizing empathetic clinical messaging and evaluating the practical implementation of patient-facing chatbots.