Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing many parts of healthcare in the United States. It offers new tools to help improve patient care and assist doctors and therapists. One area where AI is used a lot is digital mental health care. Here, AI is used for things like screening, diagnosing, planning treatment, and staying connected with patients. But as AI becomes more common in clinics, people who run these places face ethical and responsibility questions that need careful thought.
This article talks about important ethical and responsibility issues with AI in digital mental health care, especially in decision-making. It also looks at rules and systems needed to make sure AI tools are safe, work well, and are fair. This is important for those who manage healthcare organizations in the U.S., where AI’s benefits and challenges affect mental health services.
AI in digital mental health includes things like machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and decision support tools. These help both doctors and patients. Examples are internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs), AI chatbots for patient help, apps that check symptoms, and treatment suggestions based on large amounts of data.
The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) shows that AI helps improve clinical work and patient involvement in mental health care. For example, therapist-led iCBTs have better results than those done alone, which means AI works best when it supports human help, not replaces it. Digital mental health tools also make care cheaper and easier to get, especially where there are few doctors or in rural areas of the U.S.
Still, using AI in mental health has challenges in making care fair and ethical because AI depends on data and design that may not represent all groups equally.
There are several ethical concerns with using AI in mental health decisions:
Bias is a major problem. AI systems in healthcare can be biased in three ways:
The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology says these biases threaten fair treatment and patient safety. Since mental health diagnosis depends on subtle signs and patient reports, AI must avoid increasing these differences by using diverse and good-quality data and being checked regularly.
It is very important that AI’s decision process is clear. Doctors and patients need to know how AI makes its suggestions to trust and use them properly. The “right to explanation” means AI decisions should be understandable, not a secret.
If AI is not clear, doctors cannot easily check or question its decisions. This hurts decisions made together by doctors and patients, which is key in mental health care. AI systems should clearly explain their reasoning to everyone involved.
Digital mental health tools collect very private patient information. AI needs lots of data to work well, raising worries about keeping information safe and following rules like HIPAA. Ethical use of AI must have strong protections for data and get patients’ informed consent when needed.
It is also important to keep data secure during system updates, cloud use, and working with other companies to prevent leaks of patient information.
When AI helps make decisions, it can be unclear who is responsible if mistakes happen. If AI gives a wrong diagnosis or treatment, is the doctor, the clinic, or the AI maker responsible?
Clear rules about roles and responsibilities are needed to handle these questions. Without such rules, doctors might avoid using AI, and patients might not have ways to address harm.
To make AI use safe in clinics, rules and systems are being developed in the U.S. and other countries. The 2024 review by Heliyon journal points out some key needs:
Health systems in the U.S. that use AI in mental health should follow these best practices to reduce risk and improve care.
AI can be very helpful in mental health by automating routine tasks, making office work easier, and helping with clinical decisions. But it should not replace human judgment.
Health care offices are using AI more for things like answering phones, scheduling, and handling patient questions. Simbo AI is a company that makes AI phone assistants. Automating simple tasks lets office staff focus on more complex work with patients, making the clinic run better and reducing wait times.
By connecting AI phone help with electronic health records (EHR) and decision support, mental health clinics can:
These AI tools help digital mental health expand access and improve adherence while keeping care quality high.
AI-based decision support tools help doctors by looking at patient data, symptoms, and behavior to suggest treatment plans. In digital mental health, these tools might predict if a patient will relapse, recommend changing therapy, or find other health issues.
Research in JMIR shows that AI helps doctors be more accurate and efficient. But it has to work with doctors’ knowledge. AI should aid, not replace, doctors and let human judgment consider patient choices and social factors.
Adding AI to current clinic work needs technology that works well together, training for staff, and managing changes. Clinics should:
Success with AI in mental health depends a lot on how well providers and patients understand digital tools. JMIR mentions tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), which measures how well patients can use digital resources.
Better digital skills in healthcare help:
For those who manage U.S. mental health clinics, training and education are important to get the most from AI and reduce gaps.
Using AI ethically in mental health means always working to be fair, inclusive, and responsible:
Even with AI’s benefits, mental health groups face obstacles in using these tools:
To fix these issues, clinic leaders need to use proven strategies like involving teams from different fields, training staff, and working with AI developers who know healthcare rules.
Artificial intelligence has the power to help decision-making in digital mental health care across the United States. But its success depends on solving complex ethical, responsibility, and practical problems. Healthcare leaders, clinic owners, and IT staff have important jobs in guiding AI use to be safe, fair, and effective. By handling bias, clarity, privacy, and workflow issues carefully, they can use AI wisely while protecting the core values of mental health care.
JMIR is a leading, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on digital medicine and health care technologies. It ranks highly in Medical Informatics and Health Care Sciences, making it a significant source for research on emerging digital health innovations, including public mental health interventions.
JMIR provides open access to research that includes applied science on digital health tools, which allied health professionals can use for patient education, prevention, and clinical care, thus enhancing access to current evidence-based mental health interventions.
The journal covers Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs), including therapist-assisted and self-guided formats, highlighting their cost-effectiveness and use in treating various mental health disorders with attention to engagement and adherence.
Therapist-assisted iCBTs have lower dropout rates compared to self-guided ones, indicating that therapist involvement supports engagement and adherence, which is crucial for effective public mental health intervention delivery.
Long-term engagement remains challenging, with research suggesting microinterventions as a way to provide flexible, short, and meaningful behavior changes. However, integrating multiple microinterventions into coherent narratives over time needs further exploration.
Digital health literacy is essential for patients and providers to effectively utilize online resources. Tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) help assess these skills to tailor interventions and ensure access and understanding.
Biofeedback systems show promise in improving psychological well-being and mental health among workers, although current evidence often comes from controlled settings, limiting generalizability for workplace public mental health initiatives.
AI integration offers potential improvements in decision-making and patient care but raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the right to explanation, affecting ethical delivery of digital mental health services.
Barriers include maintaining patient engagement, ensuring adequate therapist involvement, digital literacy limitations, and navigating complex legal and ethical frameworks around new technologies like AI.
JMIR encourages open science, patient participation as peer reviewers, and publication of protocols before data collection, supporting collaborative and transparent research that can inform more accessible mental health interventions for allied health professionals.