Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an important part of healthcare systems around the world. While much attention has been given to AI use in advanced healthcare settings like in the United States, it is also useful to look at how AI is used and seen in developing places like Bangladesh. Knowing how aware and ready healthcare workers are for AI in Bangladesh can teach healthcare managers and IT staff in the U.S., where AI technology is growing fast in both clinical and office tasks.
This article shares results from a study in Bangladesh that looked at how healthcare workers and the public understand and use AI. It also compares these results with how AI is being used in healthcare in the United States, focusing on office work automation, improving workflows, and managing risks.
In a survey of 399 people including healthcare workers and citizens in Bangladesh, researchers used structured questionnaires to collect data. They aimed to find out what influences people to accept and use AI in healthcare. Even though Bangladesh and the U.S. are very different in technology and infrastructure, many results are similar to challenges faced by U.S. healthcare managers.
The study’s methods were reliable, which gives confidence in these results.
For policy makers, the study suggests that healthcare officials in Bangladesh need to create clear rules about privacy and regulation to build trust. There is also a big need for education to help people learn about AI and avoid wrong information. These issues are similar to what early AI adopters in the U.S. faced, where data security worries and lack of knowledge slowed the use of AI.
In the U.S., AI is already changing healthcare in many ways, such as diagnosing illnesses, scheduling patients, managing claims, and helping with medical decisions. Still, managers and IT staff in the U.S. face problems like getting their workforce to accept AI, following rules, and earning public trust. These concerns are reflected in the findings from Bangladesh.
One useful way to use AI in healthcare is to automate simple routine office tasks. This includes scheduling appointments, patient check-ins, answering calls, and checking insurance. For example, Simbo AI provides AI phone automation to handle front-office calls. These tools help make the workflow smoother, reduce mistakes, and improve patient service.
Besides front-office tasks, AI is also used later in the workflow. It helps with clinical notes, staff scheduling, billing, and even predicting if patients will miss appointments or have emergencies. These uses improve how clinics work and patient satisfaction.
Even with clear benefits, some people resist using AI.
U.S. healthcare leaders should use many methods to overcome these problems. These include education programs, clear privacy rules, honest communication, and testing AI in small steps before full use.
Lessons from Bangladesh show that policies are needed to build trust in AI. In the U.S., new rules and standards will affect how AI is used in healthcare. Managers and IT staff must keep up with rules like FDA approvals for AI medical tools, HIPAA for data protection, and ethical guidelines for AI use.
Working with lawmakers and regulators helps healthcare groups follow rules and also take part in creating AI rules that protect patients and support new technology.
Healthcare managers, owners, and IT workers in the U.S. can take important actions based on lessons from global AI studies:
By knowing what affects AI readiness and use in different healthcare settings, U.S. healthcare managers can handle the challenges of adding AI better. The study from Bangladesh shows that awareness, education, and proper rules are important and apply to the U.S. too. Using AI to automate routine office tasks—such as those offered by Simbo AI—can improve operational flow and patient experience, making healthcare better overall.
Healthcare organizations that take smart steps to support AI use will be better able to use new technology and improve both office work and patient care.
The study aims to assess the awareness, perception, and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in Bangladesh’s healthcare sector.
A quantitative methodology was employed, utilizing a structured questionnaire through a survey conducted with a sample of 399 healthcare professionals and public members.
The study found that social media influence and technological awareness significantly enhanced readiness for AI, while perceived risk had a weaker positive effect.
Descriptive statistics summarized participant demographics, while inferential statistical techniques, including regression analysis, were used to examine relationships between AI readiness and adoption.
The study suggests that policymakers develop robust regulatory frameworks to address privacy concerns, enhance trust in AI, and implement educational initiatives to improve AI literacy.
The study highlighted gaps in awareness and perception of AI among healthcare professionals and the public in Bangladesh.
The measurement model confirmed reliability and validity, with strong factor loadings and discriminant validity, ensuring accurate analysis of the survey data.
The significant factors impacting readiness for AI were social media influence and technological awareness, with path coefficients of 0.354 and 0.162, respectively.
No, personal innovativeness and perceived susceptibility were found to be insignificant in their influence on AI adoption.
This study contributes to limited research on AI adoption in Bangladesh’s healthcare sector, providing insights into awareness and perceptions of healthcare stakeholders.