Patient triage in ENT clinics means figuring out how urgent a patient’s issue is and what kind of appointment they need. This is especially true for symptoms like chronic dizziness. Around 70 million Americans have this problem, which creates a lot of work for clinics. Before, doctors spent 20% to 40% of appointment time just checking referrals and deciding what care patients needed. This took a lot of time and caused delays.
To fix this, Mayo Clinic started using an AI system for triage. It uses adaptive electronic questionnaires and decision-tree methods to sort symptoms and suggest the right kind of appointment. When tested with past patient data, the system was 87% accurate in predicting what kind of ENT consultation was needed, such as for balance disorders or vertigo follow-ups.
The AI works by asking patients structured questions, mostly multiple-choice. These answers guide the system through the decision tree to the best result. This clear structure helps the AI make better decisions. Electronic questionnaires replaced paper forms, which helped improve data quality and consistency.
Because of this system, triage time went down by 75%. This means doctors can see more patients without hiring extra staff. The AI helps by doing repeated tasks but does not make final decisions alone. Doctors still check and can change AI suggestions. This mix keeps care quality high and lets professionals stay involved.
A big problem with AI triage is balancing false positives and false negatives. False positives happen when patients are sent to specialists unnecessarily. False negatives happen when patients who need care are missed. Both can cause problems, like long waitlists or wrong care.
Mayo Clinic made the AI able to change its decision rules based on how many specialist appointments are available right then. If there are few ENT or neurology appointments, the AI becomes stricter and lowers false positives. If many appointments are free, it refers more patients to reduce false negatives.
If the AI is not sure about a referral, it does not say no. Instead, it delays the decision and sets the patient up for a specialist visit when there is time. This way, patients do not lose care while the system manages workload.
This system helps match patient referrals to the number of appointments available. It helps keep patient flow smooth and reduces stress on clinics.
Mayo Clinic shared six steps for adding AI into clinical work:
This approach helps avoid problems faced by tools that are just set up and forgotten.
Mayo Clinic’s AI triage showed clear results:
Dr. Christina Yuan highlighted that AI must work fairly for all patient groups. This includes people of different races, genders, ethnicities, and incomes. Challenges like economic differences and health literacy still exist.
Mayo Clinic checked how the AI worked across different groups to find and fix biases. They also made sure users like clinicians could give feedback to keep the system practical.
Using AI is an ongoing job. Regular updates and checks help the system stay accurate and trusted over time.
AI decision-tree models for triage fit with other tools that automate front-office work. For clinic managers and IT staff, using AI helps solve different problems:
These improvements help clinics where front-office staff have many repetitive tasks and appointment spots are limited.
AI phone automation tools complement clinical triage models by handling first patient contacts. Together, they give a fuller solution to patient flow.
For clinics in the US using AI in ENT triage and office automation, here are important points:
Using AI decision-tree models for ENT triage with flexible thresholds can improve clinic efficiency without lowering care quality or overloading staff. Mayo Clinic’s experience shows better patient flow and accuracy when AI is carefully added. Combining AI triage with front-office tools like AI phone automation offers a more responsive outpatient process. Paying close attention to data quality, clinician input, fairness, and ongoing checks is key to success.
The AI system automates the triage process by using adaptive electronic questionnaires tailored to patient symptoms, reducing clinician review time from 20-40% to a 75% faster triage process. This increases patient throughput without adding staff, maintaining clinician oversight for adaptability and trust.
The system utilizes a decision-tree model based on structured patient responses to predict appropriate appointments with an accuracy of 87%, ensuring targeted referrals for symptoms such as balance issues or vertigo.
The AI model adjusts thresholds based on specialty resource availability to minimize false positives during limited appointment slots, while deferring uncertain cases rather than denying care, allowing eventual specialty visits without overwhelming clinical resources.
It comprises System Redesign, Data Quality, Model Selection, Human-Computer Synergy, Change Management, and Result Measurement, ensuring AI tools integrate smoothly into workflows, maintain high data standards, involve clinicians, engage stakeholders, and demonstrate measurable benefits.
Transitioning from paper to structured electronic questionnaires with mostly multiple-choice responses improved data consistency and processing efficiency by the AI, minimizing open-ended questions to reduce barriers for automation and streamline data entry.
LLMs assist in automating clinical documentation by extracting key information from patient records, enhancing research, quality improvement, and identifying candidates for procedures like cochlear implants and sinus surgeries, though requiring thorough validation for fairness and reliability.
The implementation emphasizes equity by addressing socio-economic disparities and health literacy in design and deployment phases, with performance tested across race, gender, and ethnicity, acknowledging ongoing needs to study health literacy impacts specifically.
Transparency, clinician feedback incorporation, and maintaining oversight over AI recommendations build trust. Early stakeholder involvement and iterative adjustments help refine workflows and promote acceptance and sustainability of the AI system.
The system is classified as an operational aid, not a diagnostic device, so it does not require FDA approval. Internal use combined with clinician oversight reduces regulatory complexity, facilitating deployment in clinical workflows.
The AI dynamically adjusts recommendation thresholds linked to available specialty slots (e.g., neurology), prioritizing urgent cases and offering flexible scheduling by deferring uncertain specialty referrals to avoid overload while ensuring patients receive necessary care later.