AI technologies in healthcare offer many chances to help. But they also bring risks. AI systems can make mistakes. For example, if AI is trained on data that is incomplete or biased, it might give unfair advice or wrong diagnoses. AI can miss important details and may not adjust well to new problems without human help.
Research shows that relying only on AI or fixed rules can be risky. Rules can become outdated as AI and security threats change. Without people watching closely, AI might produce biased or unsafe results that do not follow the law.
In the U.S., healthcare leaders must make sure AI improves work but also follows laws like HIPAA. This means humans must check and guide AI decisions all the time.
Kabir Gulati, Vice President of Data Applications at Proprio, says trust grows when AI is clear and understandable. He says AI should help humans think better, not replace them. Laura M. Cascella points out that even if doctors are not AI experts, they should know enough AI to explain it to patients.
Human-in-the-Loop means people review AI work during its entire process. Instead of letting AI work alone, humans check important AI choices while the AI is being built, used, and kept running.
Key parts of HITL governance include:
This human work is important in healthcare because safety, ethics, and privacy matter a lot. Dilip Mohapatra says balancing AI and human checks “is no longer optional — it’s a necessity” to follow rules like the EU AI Act and NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
In healthcare, AI governance needs more than just tech controls. It also must protect values and make fair choices. People can spot problems AI may miss, like fine clinical details or privacy risks.
Human oversight helps with many challenges:
Chuck Podesta, CISO of Renown Health, used an automated system to screen AI vendors based on IEEE UL 2933 standards. This method reduces manual work but still needs human experts to approve. It helps keep patients safe and data secure. This example shows the value of humans working with machines in healthcare.
Healthcare leaders must use AI automation while keeping rules, safety, and ethics in mind. For example, tools like Simbo AI handle front-office calls and patient questions. This helps patients and lets staff focus on clinical work.
Here are some ways AI automation works with human checks:
AI does well with data-heavy or repeated tasks. But humans are needed to understand results, handle tough cases, and make fair decisions. This mix helps make work smoother without losing safety or honesty.
By joining AI and human skill, healthcare providers can cut audit times by up to half, reduce errors, and find risks sooner. They can also keep up with changing rules and change workflows as needed.
To make HITL work, healthcare groups must train staff and set up teams with many skills.
This way follows advice from the NIST AI Risk Management Framework. It talks about managing AI by setting rules, evaluating risks, checking performance, and handling problems.
Bias and privacy are big worries when using AI in healthcare. If data is uneven or poor, AI can become unfair. Privacy leaks risk exposing personal health data, which can lead to legal trouble and loss of trust.
Human work is key to reduce these risks:
Research from Vation Ventures warns that fully automatic AI decisions can break human values. Using HITL means people guide AI by ethical standards and society’s needs.
US laws like HIPAA and HITECH require protecting patient data and careful use of technology. These laws don’t cover all AI problems yet, so human oversight is even more important.
Using HITL helps healthcare groups:
Ongoing training, regular reviews, and governance groups are key to meeting rules and encouraging responsibility.
Healthcare groups planning to use or expand AI can take these steps to use HITL governance well:
These steps help balance the benefits of AI with important human safeguards. This way, US healthcare can use AI tools while keeping patients safe, following laws, and providing fair care.
Healthcare administrators, owners, and IT managers in the US should remember that AI’s good results depend a lot on human oversight. By combining automation with human judgment in a strong Human-in-the-Loop system, healthcare providers can better control risks, improve workflows, and keep patient trust in a digital health world.
Human oversight ensures ethical decision-making, addresses AI biases, adapts to evolving cybersecurity threats, and validates AI-driven insights to prevent potentially harmful errors in high-stakes healthcare environments.
Relying only on static policies can lead to outdated guidelines, inability to respond to emerging threats, lack of contextual awareness, and fixed procedures that fail to adapt to the complexity and fast evolution of AI technologies in healthcare.
Organizations should provide comprehensive AI literacy training focusing on AI ethics, bias detection, data privacy, risk management, and encourage teamwork and communication to build skills for monitoring and managing AI effectively.
Human expertise provides judgment, ethical oversight, and adaptability, ensuring AI outputs align with safety and fairness, while AI handles repetitive risk screening, automated compliance checks, and pattern identification.
Current regulations such as HIPAA lack provisions specific to AI challenges, requiring healthcare organizations to integrate policies with ongoing human oversight to address gaps in risk, ethical concerns, and data privacy related to AI use.
AI governance committees oversee AI initiatives by coordinating clinical, IT, security, and compliance teams to define roles, develop policies, perform ongoing risk assessments, ensure data privacy, and monitor AI system performance continuously.
By adopting a ‘human-in-the-loop’ approach where AI automates repetitive or data-heavy tasks, and humans oversee critical, ethical, or complex decisions that require real-time judgment and contextual understanding.
Platforms like Censinet RiskOps™ combine automated risk assessments with human oversight, enabling efficient vendor assessments, real-time monitoring, compliance checks, and streamlining collaboration among subject matter experts.
Regular human reviews and audits can identify biased AI outputs, monitor data access to protect patient privacy, and perform risk assessments to prevent discriminatory outcomes and safeguard sensitive healthcare data.
Continuous monitoring allows for routine performance evaluations, detection of vulnerabilities, real-time threat responses, and adjustments in AI management, thus maintaining patient safety, compliance, and adapting to evolving cybersecurity risks.