Third-party risks come from suppliers, vendors, or service providers that work with a healthcare organization’s systems, data, or processes. These groups can cause cybersecurity problems, disrupt operations, break rules, or harm a healthcare provider’s reputation. Healthcare is a common target because patient data is very valuable. Patient data often includes permanent identifiers that are worth more on illegal markets than many other types of information.
Organizations have special challenges because third parties often connect through networked medical devices, software, cloud services, and communication tools. The growing Internet of Medical Things (IoMT), which includes items like ICU monitors, wearable sensors, and diagnostic machines, adds more complexity and chances for security problems.
Regulations are changing too. For example, the FDA updated cybersecurity rules for IoMT devices starting in October 2023. The New York State Department of Health’s new cybersecurity rules begin in October 2024. Healthcare groups must keep their third-party risk programs up to date to meet these security and legal rules.
A good third-party risk assessment program is a clear process for finding, checking, managing, and watching risks from outside vendors. This happens during the whole time a vendor works with the healthcare group. This includes when the vendor starts work, during their work, and when they finish. The main steps are:
Healthcare groups should first list all third-party vendors. This list includes IoMT providers, cloud service subscriptions, IT consultants, and communication platforms. It is important to sort these vendors by their risk and importance.
This system helps healthcare groups focus on managing the highest-risk vendors first.
Before making a contract, healthcare groups should do detailed risk checks of vendors. These checks include:
Using known risk frameworks like ISO 14971:2019 for medical devices or the IMDRF framework for medical device software helps make these checks standard.
Contracts with vendors should clearly say what security is needed, how to report incidents, who is responsible, and audit rules. Fixing risks is important. Vendors must give timelines and show how they will fix problems before and during their work.
Assessing risk is not just once. It needs ongoing monitoring with regular audits, checking security changes, and confirming the vendor follows new rules. Healthcare groups should use software tools to watch risks in real time instead of manual work that can be slow or have mistakes.
When stopping work with a vendor, healthcare groups must make sure the vendor loses access to systems and patient data safely. Sensitive information should be retrieved or destroyed. It is important to check that no risks remain. Keeping good records helps with audits and managing any problems later.
The IoMT is growing fast. Spending in the U.S. healthcare sector on IoMT devices may pass $400 billion by 2027. These connected devices help with care, remote monitoring, early detection, and saving costs. But they also bring cybersecurity risks.
The FDA rules starting in October 2023 say all new IoMT device vendors must have cybersecurity plans with ongoing risk monitoring and regular updates. Healthcare groups need to:
Not managing IoMT risks well can cause data breaches, fines, disruptions in service, and lose patient trust.
Healthcare organizations handle a lot of protected health information (PHI). This makes them targets for attacks like ransomware, phishing, and social engineering. Third-party systems add more ways for attackers to reach the network. A strong cybersecurity program that includes third-party risks is needed.
Important cybersecurity steps for vendors include:
Rules like the New York State Department of Health’s cybersecurity requirements (starting October 2024) require hospitals to keep audit logs, report important incidents within 72 hours, and follow the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and Health Industry Cybersecurity Practices (HICP). These are likely to become common in other states too, so following these rules is important.
Managing third-party risks cannot be just IT’s job. It needs teamwork from clinical leaders, administrators, purchasing teams, lawyers, and cybersecurity experts.
Healthcare groups that share responsibility for cybersecurity lower risks from mistakes and improve protection against threats.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools can help manage the hard parts of third-party risk in healthcare. Manual work can be slow and have mistakes, but technology can help.
AI tools can collect data from vendor assessments, watch security changes continuously, and score risks using real-time data. This helps healthcare groups find problems early, manage many vendors without hiring more people, and keep up with rules.
Automation software can handle the whole vendor process. It can remind staff about contract renewals, start new assessments, track deadlines for fixes, and make audit reports. This cuts down on paperwork and makes risk management faster and more accurate.
AI can spot unusual vendor actions and network traffic that may show security problems. Early warnings let security teams act fast to reduce harm to patient care.
Health groups like Baptist Health and Intermountain Health use AI-based risk management tools. These tools help organize IT risk work centrally and compare with peers. They have made vendor assessments quicker and improved how resources are used. This shows how AI and automation work in real life.
Running a good third-party risk assessment program in healthcare needs a clear process that covers finding vendors, sorting them by risk, assessing risks, watching them continuously, and ending vendor relationships safely. Security, following rules, and operational strength are important.
The growth of connected devices like IoMT adds new risks that healthcare groups must watch closely.
Working together across clinical, IT, and administration teams with leadership support helps make sure risk management fits clinical work and organizational goals. Using AI and automation can make vendor risk programs more efficient, accurate, and able to grow.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. that want to protect patient data, keep care quality high, and follow laws should use these best practices for their third-party risk programs.
TPRM involves identifying, assessing, and controlling risks occurring due to interactions with third parties, such as suppliers and vendors. Its objectives include ensuring compliance with regulations, protecting confidential information, and maintaining supply chain security.
This assessment analyzes risks introduced by third-party relationships in an organization’s supply chain, crucial for tailoring the TPRM program to specific risks, standards, and compliance requirements.
Third-party risk poses a potential for organizations to suffer data breaches or disruptions via external entities, significantly increasing cybersecurity risks.
Examples include cybersecurity risks from data breaches, operational risks disrupting business operations, compliance risks impacting regulations, reputational risks affecting public opinion, and financial risks due to poor supply chain management.
A TPRM program includes vendor evaluation, engagement, risk remediation, decision-making, and continuous monitoring of third-party vendors’ security postures.
Best practices include defining organizational goals, obtaining stakeholder buy-in, building partnerships for vendor assessment, tiering risks, involving procurement in the process, and continuous monitoring of vendors.
Vendors can be classified into tiers based on their criticality and risk levels: Tier 1 (high risk), Tier 2 (medium risk), Tier 3 (low risk), addressing Tier 1 issues first.
Procurement should evaluate high-risk exposures of suppliers during onboarding and assessment, identify baseline risks, and prepare for potential disruptions, ensuring informed vendor selection.
Continuous monitoring allows organizations to assess vendor risks in real-time, enabling proactive identification of security issues and reducing resource expenditure on manual assessments.
Third-party failures can lead to operational disruptions, data breaches, and negative financial impacts, highlighting the critical need for effective TPRM to mitigate these risks.