GDPR was made to protect people’s personal data and privacy rights in the European Union. For healthcare groups, GDPR has rules about collecting, using, storing, and sharing sensitive health data. Even though the United States has its own laws like HIPAA, GDPR still matters for U.S. healthcare providers who work with European patients or have partners in Europe.
The French data protection agency CNIL recently gave updated advice about using AI under GDPR. They see that AI brings special challenges for protecting data. Rules like data minimization, purpose limitation, and rights to access, correction, objection, and deletion must be changed a bit for AI systems. These rules help handle sensitive health data in AI tools like phone automation and patient answering services.
Advanced AI healthcare models such as large language models and machine learning systems use large amounts of data. This often includes personal health information (PHI). These models create some technical and legal problems when patients want to use their GDPR rights, such as:
AI models usually use data in a combined and anonymous way to make guesses or automate tasks. Because of this, finding exact personal data in the model is hard. When a patient asks to see or fix their data, healthcare staff must find and separate this data from complicated AI training sets. AI may also “remember” parts of the data, so changing individual details can be very difficult without re-training the model.
GDPR gives people the right to have their data deleted. But this can cause problems with AI models that need old data to keep learning. Removing patient data from a trained AI model is often impossible without breaking the model. CNIL notes this is a big challenge, especially as AI systems become bigger and more complex.
Healthcare AI often involves several groups: doctors, AI developers, data handlers, and cloud service companies. It is sometimes not clear who is responsible for GDPR rules, like who is the data controller or processor. This problem makes handling data rights requests harder because different groups must work together, and each holds parts of the data or model.
GDPR says data must be collected for specific purposes. But general-purpose AI models, like those used in front-office phone systems, are made for many different uses. This makes it hard to limit the purpose and explain to people exactly how their data will be used, especially when uses change after the data is collected.
CNIL’s recent advice offers ways to handle these challenges by adjusting GDPR rules for AI in healthcare:
Medical practice managers in charge of AI should use strategies based on CNIL’s privacy-by-design rules:
Using AI in healthcare front-office tasks like phone automation and answering patient calls gives chances and problems for handling GDPR rights. Organizations like Simbo AI, which make AI answering systems, should keep these points in mind.
AI can speed up processing patient data rights requests by:
This automation can reduce the work for healthcare staff, help meet GDPR time limits, and lower human mistakes.
Automated calls can explain data use policies and get patient consent. AI chatbots or voice response systems can tailor consent steps based on risk and how operations run. This helps patients understand when their data is collected or used to train AI.
AI answering services should use encryption, anonymization, and strong access controls. These steps follow GDPR rules and protect patient data during sending and storage.
AI can predict when patients might call or what questions they have to improve service. But predictions must follow data protection rights and have safety limits on data use and storage time.
In the U.S., healthcare groups may not always have to follow GDPR directly but often do when working with EU patients or following global rules. Those using AI in front-office tasks should:
New technical methods can help healthcare administrators meet AI and GDPR challenges:
These tools are still developing but can reduce the burden on healthcare groups while keeping benefits.
Using AI in healthcare front-office work like phone automation and answering brings duties to protect data under GDPR—even for U.S. groups. Dealing with access, correction, and deletion of personal data in AI systems needs careful technical and organizational plans. Medical administrators, practice owners, and IT managers should focus on privacy-by-design, clear roles, automated workflows to support data rights, and good patient communication that meets legal rules. Working with AI makers such as Simbo AI to build systems that follow laws and work well will be important to manage compliance and improve patient service and healthcare operation.
The GDPR provides a legal framework that balances innovation and personal data protection, enabling responsible AI use in healthcare while ensuring individuals’ fundamental rights are respected.
Key GDPR principles like data minimisation, purpose limitation, and individuals’ rights must be flexibly applied to AI contexts, considering challenges like large datasets and general-purpose AI systems.
Individuals must be informed about the use of their personal data in AI training, with the communication adapted to risks and operational constraints; general disclosures are acceptable when direct contact is not feasible.
Exercising rights such as access, correction, or deletion is difficult due to AI models’ complexity, anonymity, and data memorization, complicating individual identification and modification within models.
Data retention can be extended if justified and secured, especially for valuable datasets requiring significant investment and recognized standards, balancing utility and privacy risks.
Developers should incorporate privacy by design, aim to anonymise models without affecting their purpose, and create solutions preventing disclosure of confidential personal data by AI outputs.
Organizations may provide broad or general information, such as categories of data sources, especially when data comes from third parties and direct individual contact is impractical.
Refusal may be justified by excessive cost, technical impossibility, or practical difficulties, but flexible timelines and reasonable solutions are encouraged to respect individuals’ rights when possible.
CNIL’s recommendations are the result of broad consultations involving diverse stakeholders, ensuring alignment with real-world AI applications and fostering responsible innovation.
CNIL actively issues guidance, supports organizations, monitors European Commission initiatives like the AI Office, and coordinates efforts to clarify AI legal frameworks and good practice codes.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
