Healthcare organizations in the United States are starting to see how generative artificial intelligence (AI) can help make work faster, cut costs, and improve care for patients. By 2025, generative AI will no longer be just a small test project. Many healthcare groups want to use AI deeply in their daily work and patient care. But moving from small AI tests to full use is still hard for most hospitals and clinics. This article looks at the main problems healthcare leaders and IT teams face when trying to grow AI use. It also offers practical ways to help AI succeed.
Recent studies show over 70% of businesses worldwide, including healthcare, now use AI for at least one task. In the U.S., big health groups like Pfizer and UnitedHealth Group have seen changes from using AI. For example, Pfizer made drugs faster by 18%, and UnitedHealth automated half of its claims process. This made fewer mistakes and faster service. But many AI projects still stay small and do not grow across the whole organization.
A survey by The Hackett Group found that 89% of executives planned to grow generative AI projects by 2025, compared to only 16% in 2024. This shows that more leaders trust AI for business. However, 30% of these projects might stop after early testing. This happens because it is hard to grow AI systems, especially in healthcare. Patient safety, privacy, laws, and good data are all very important and make things tricky.
Good data is needed for AI to work well. Healthcare data is often incomplete or stored in many systems found in clinics, hospitals, and insurance companies. Small AI tests usually use clean and simple data. But real AI use needs to handle messy data from many sources. This data can include electronic health records (EHR), images, lab results, billing details, and patient reports. Poor or scattered data makes AI less reliable. This can cause doctors and managers to not trust the system.
Many groups find it hard to set clear goals and measure how AI helps. Without proof that AI saves money, frees up time, or improves care, it is tough to keep funding projects. Gartner says unclear ROI is a top reason many AI tests stop early. Healthcare groups with limited budgets need to focus on AI that clearly benefits patients and managers.
Healthcare AI handles private patient information protected by strict laws like HIPAA in the U.S. Groups must keep data safe, reduce bias, be clear about how AI works, and explain AI decisions. Adding these rules into workflows can be hard. Poor governance leads to weak AI oversight and less trust. Laws worldwide are getting stricter. For example, the European Union’s AI Act may influence rules in the U.S. Healthcare groups should create governance that fits current and future laws.
Using AI means changing current work practices, IT systems, and staff duties. Many workers worry AI might replace their jobs or are not familiar with AI tools. Without good communication, training, and quick successes, AI may remain only in small test groups. Leaders need to plan carefully and support AI use across the whole organization.
Many healthcare groups find it hard to hire and keep AI experts, data scientists, and tech workers. This shortage makes it difficult to build, watch, and improve AI tools. Busy doctors and managers also have little time to learn about AI, which is needed to use it well. Training current staff or working with AI specialists can help fix this problem.
Many healthcare IT systems are old and not made for AI. AI needs safe and scalable systems that can handle big data and work quickly. Automated data flow, checking AI regularly, backup plans, and good AI operations (called MLOps) are needed. Some groups do not have these technical setups.
Healthcare groups wanting to grow AI use beyond small tests can follow practical strategies from recent studies and real examples.
Growing AI means linking projects to clear business goals. Goals can be to reduce patient wait times, cut costs, or improve diagnosis. Setting success measures early helps get support from leaders and proper resources. For instance, a company called Key Group in finance grew AI use by showing clear value and good governance.
Good data management brings scattered data together and cleans it. Healthcare groups should automate data flow and keep checking data quality. Using synthetic data and tools to reduce bias can make AI models more accurate when real data is missing or uneven.
Making privacy, bias checks, explainability, and audits part of AI workflows builds trust and follows the law. Leaders need to know AI risks and control AI outputs carefully. Since AI often helps with risky clinical decisions, following strict ethical and legal rules is very important.
Healthcare staff need ongoing training that explains what AI can and cannot do. Training should fit different jobs—from clinical staff using AI results to IT teams managing AI systems. Sharing benefits and limits of AI helps staff accept it. Early successes should be shared with staff to encourage wider use.
This method lowers risks and helps learning while showing small wins.
Updating old IT systems to support AI is important. Spending on cloud computing, safe data storage, and scalable processing helps AI run smoothly. Using machine learning operations (MLOps)—which includes version control, model checks, and backup plans—keeps AI results reliable and systems ready to fix errors quickly.
General AI may not suit complex healthcare tasks well. Custom AI models for clinical tasks like claims processing, note summarization, or image analysis work better. These focused models also handle patient diversity and specific situations more correctly.
Moving from small AI tests to full use in healthcare means automating work to make things faster and better for patients. AI helps improve front-office and back-office work, cuts administrative tasks, and supports clinical decisions.
Companies like Simbo AI use AI for handling patient calls. Automated phone systems manage appointments, questions, prescription refills, and referrals. This frees staff to do harder tasks. These systems give faster answers and work 24/7. AI helpers can run patient interviews or check insurance with human backup, cutting wait times and errors.
Generative AI tools make summaries of long clinical notes and draft documents. This saves doctors time on paperwork. AI-based claims automation speeds billing, improves accuracy, and reduces denied claims. For example, UnitedHealth used AI for half of its claims process and made image diagnosis better.
AI helps radiologists and pathologists find problems in images faster and more accurately. By adding AI results directly into clinical work, care teams make faster, smarter decisions. AI helps improve diagnosis and personalize treatments.
Generative AI can study large amounts of data to predict patient numbers, improve staff plans, and manage supplies. These AI insights help use resources better and cut costs. Similar ideas used in finance can work in healthcare too.
Successful automation combines AI abilities with human skills. AI gives data summaries and suggestions, but healthcare workers make the final calls. This teamwork reduces wrong AI answers and keeps patients safe. Staff training should support this shared work.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. wanting to grow generative AI must focus on many things at once. Patient data is sensitive, laws are strict, and AI ethics matter a lot. Good governance and following rules are needed. Healthcare data is complicated and needs strong data systems and AI models made for healthcare.
Training workers and changing work culture help AI acceptance and use over time. Leaders must guide AI projects with clear goals and ways to measure success. Updating IT systems and using operational best practices like MLOps make AI more stable and trustworthy.
Even with challenges, healthcare groups that grow AI with a clear plan can cut paperwork, help patients communicate, improve diagnosis, and make better decisions. Leaders should look beyond small tests and work toward wide AI use that supports clinical care and administration.
By taking careful steps based on proven methods, U.S. healthcare organizations can responsibly use generative AI to change how care is delivered by 2025 and later.
Enterprises face inconsistent adoption of generative AI due to expensive, error-prone technology, uneven productivity impacts across job roles, and uncertainty about AI’s optimal use. Despite high investment, only a small fraction (about 8%) consider their AI projects mature, with organizations struggling to scale solutions beyond pilots to production.
Generative AI is transitioning from standalone chatbots to backend applications that summarize and parse unstructured data, enabling scalability. The technology is also moving towards multimodal models that process audio, video, and images. This evolution enables integration into complex workflows beyond text-based interactions.
Agentic AI models autonomously perform tasks with real-time adaptability and decision-making, unlike generative AI which typically provides outputs based on prompts. In healthcare, agentic AI can manage workflows and routine actions but requires human oversight due to risks of errors and ethical challenges connected to autonomy.
Risks include misinformation due to AI hallucinations that can cause harmful decisions, ethical concerns around acting on behalf of users without supervision, potential unintended real-world consequences, and higher standards needed for high-risk applications such as patient care.
As foundation models become widely available and similar in performance, healthcare providers focus on fine-tuning models for specific tasks, usability, cost-effectiveness, trust, and integration with existing systems—shifting competitive advantage from model novelty to practical application and safety.
Healthcare demands personalized, narrow AI models focused on specific clinical tasks to ensure accuracy and safety. General models may not meet specialized use cases or risk tolerances. Tailored models also address ethical concerns and account for patient diversity and contextual relevance.
AI literacy enables healthcare workers to effectively use AI tools, critically assess outputs, and understand limitations, which is essential for trust and integration. Continuous modular learning and on-the-job training are recommended to keep pace with evolving AI applications without requiring technical expertise.
The regulatory environment is fragmented and evolving, with strict regulations like the EU AI Act contrasting with more lenient U.S. policies. Healthcare AI must navigate safety, fairness, and compliance risks, often adhering to the most stringent standards globally to ensure patient safety and data protection.
AI agents introduce risks like sophisticated phishing, impersonation via AI-generated audio/video, and adversarial attacks compromising AI models. In healthcare, this jeopardizes patient data, operational integrity, and trust, necessitating integration of AI security into broader cybersecurity strategies.
Organizations should focus on measurable outcomes, invest in domain-specific model development, enhance AI literacy, implement ethical oversight, ensure rigorous validation and monitoring of AI outputs, navigate regulatory requirements proactively, and embed AI security within IT frameworks to safely scale AI agent usage.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
