Traditional healthcare SaaS means software delivered over the internet to help hospitals, clinics, and health systems with clinical and administrative tasks. These software tools include electronic health records (EHR), managing money flows, scheduling patients, or running the practice. Usually, customers pay a subscription fee based on how many users or seats they have.
One big challenge with traditional healthcare SaaS is the long time it takes to sell and set up. It often needs lots of customization, linking with existing systems, and staff training. This can take from 12 to 18 months or even longer before everything is in place and benefits can be seen. Also, traditional SaaS mostly offers tools and expects users to make them work well. This can slow growth and make customers less satisfied.
From a financial view, these traditional SaaS companies often charge fixed fees per license or seat. These costs come from IT budgets at medical organizations, which are often tight. The sales process can be slow because many people must approve, and they carefully think about the return on investment (ROI) for each software license.
Recently, venture capital funding for traditional SaaS has slowed compared to AI-powered health tech. These companies tend to show stable but slower revenue growth because their value is mostly based on tools instead of outcomes.
AI Services-as-Software is a new way that goes beyond traditional SaaS by using AI, smart algorithms, and automated workflows. These handle whole administrative tasks instead of just offering a tool. For healthcare managers in the U.S., this means they can let software handle complex and repetitive tasks on its own with little human help.
This approach targets the huge $1 trillion yearly cost of healthcare administration in the U.S. This includes billing, coding, clinical notes, auditing claims, and scheduling. Many of these jobs need lots of detailed manual work, causing slowdowns and staff shortages.
Unlike traditional SaaS, AI Services-as-Software sell finished results or deliverables. Instead of just giving software users run, they provide a full service with clear results, like faster patient scheduling, error-free notes, or automatic claim processing.
For example, Simbo AI helps with phone automation and answering services in the front office. It can automate patient calls, cut wait times, and make things run smoother in ways traditional software can’t easily do. Other examples include Abridge for clinical notes automation and Qventus for surgery scheduling.
One clear difference between AI Services-as-Software and traditional SaaS is how fast they grow. Bessemer Venture Partners found that AI Services-as-Software companies can reach $10 million in recurring revenue much faster—sometimes in just a few months. Traditional SaaS companies usually take many years to get there.
Reasons for faster growth with AI Services-as-Software include:
On the other hand, traditional SaaS companies face longer sales cycles, usually 12 to 18 months, because of integration needs and slower approval.
The length of sales cycles matters for healthcare leaders choosing between traditional and AI models. AI Services-as-Software often sell in less than six months, much quicker than the year or more for traditional SaaS.
Reasons include:
In the U.S., where staff shortages and costs are big problems, faster sales mean quicker use of tools that save staff time and lower admin work.
AI Services-as-Software use different ways to make money compared to traditional SaaS. Instead of charging per user license, they charge based on value or specific results delivered.
For example, Simbo AI might charge for each call handled or appointment made through their system. Another company, SmarterDx, charges based on how many claims they review or their completeness.
These outcome-based payments have several effects for healthcare managers:
By focusing on results, AI providers lower risks for buyers and help healthcare providers adopt these tools more widely.
One main reason why AI Services-as-Software grow fast is their use of AI technologies to automate workflows in healthcare administration. This section explains key technologies and their effects on operations.
AI Services-as-Software use several AI tools to automate admin tasks:
The U.S. healthcare system faces staff shortages, especially for repetitive clerical jobs like coding, note-taking, and claims processing. AI workflow automation helps by:
For clinics and small practices with few admin staff, AI automation can greatly increase how much they can do without adding more employees.
The “State of Health Tech 2024” report by Bessemer Venture Partners shows some big trends:
Looking ahead, U.S. medical practice managers can expect AI workflow automation to become more important in managing insurance, pharmacy data, and clinical support.
For healthcare leaders managing medical practices, AI Services-as-Software offer some clear benefits over traditional SaaS:
Practices with more patients and fewer admin staff should consider AI Services-as-Software to lower costs and improve workflow. Providers wanting to update front office work, such as with phone automation from Simbo AI, will find this helpful.
This review shows that AI Services-as-Software are a major change in healthcare technology in the U.S. They grow faster, sell quicker, and earn revenue based on results, fitting well with what medical practices need. The use of AI workflow automation is likely to keep growing, helping healthcare providers work better and deal with admin challenges.
AI Services-as-Software leverage AI to autonomously perform tasks traditionally done by humans, delivering outcomes rather than just software tools. This model streamlines complex administrative workflows across providers, payers, and pharma, addressing the $1 trillion administrative spend and healthcare labor shortage by automating tasks like medical documentation, claims auditing, and back-office operations.
AI Services-as-Software show faster go-to-market trajectories and growth rates than traditional SaaS. They often sell outcomes, tapping larger budgets and bypassing long change management cycles by outsourcing end-to-end workflows, resulting in shorter sales cycles (<6 months) versus traditional 12-18 months and higher contract values.
There are three: Copilots, which augment and automate worker tasks; AI-first services, which fully outsource services with human-in-the-loop for quality assurance; and Agents, which aim to fully automate workflows, though fully autonomous agents in healthcare are still in development.
COGS drivers include AI model costs, computational resources, and human-in-the-loop expenses for quality assurance and reinforcement learning. Despite variability (10%-90% gross margins), average gross margins hover around 60-65%, reflecting differences in complexity, accuracy needs, and scale economies.
In 2024, 38% of healthcare investments targeted AI solutions, often yielding valuation multiples 2-5x higher than non-AI peers. This is fueled by large market potential, new business models, and urgent demand for AI to reduce costs and improve ROI in provider, payer, and pharma workflows.
Early-stage ventures struggle particularly at Series A and B funding rounds with longer times to raise capital, compared to other sectors, making efficient growth, cash preservation, and proving product-market fit critical for success in a tougher financing environment.
Emerging trends include payer administration insourcing using AI Services-as-Software, transparency tooling in pharmacy pricing and rebate management, AI-assisted clinical services to empower providers, and technologies enabling value-based care systems of record to support risk models and outcome measurement.
Instead of per-seat or license fees, these companies often get paid based on units of value delivered or outcomes, aligning with large OpEx and services budgets rather than IT budgets, facilitating procurement and potentially commanding premium pricing.
Examples include Abridge, automating clinical note generation; SmarterDx, AI-powered clinical review of medical claims; Qventus, automating surgery scheduling; and Plenful, focusing on back-office automation for specialty pharmacies.
AI Services-as-Software reduce the burden of repetitive administrative tasks on healthcare staff, allowing workforce reallocation to areas demanding human expertise while cutting operational costs in time-consuming processes like medical scribing, coding, and claims management.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
