For many years, healthcare providers and managers have used traditional SaaS platforms to help with tasks like Electronic Health Records (EHRs), appointment scheduling, billing, and patient communication. These software platforms usually require licenses for each user or seat. The contracts often take a long time to finalize, ranging from 12 to 18 months. This slow adoption is due to strict rules, difficulty fitting into existing IT setups, and users resisting workflow changes.
Traditional healthcare SaaS mainly offers workflow tools that need internal teams to manage processes or link with other systems. Even though these tools help with some automation, they still need a lot of manual work and changes in how work is done inside organizations. This often slows down implementation, reduces return on investment (ROI), and demands more effort from healthcare workers during setup.
Besides taking more time, traditional SaaS often uses IT budgets and comes with extra licensing fees. This can limit how flexible and scalable they are, especially for smaller clinics or places with tight budgets. So, while traditional SaaS meets basic digital needs in healthcare, there is still a lot of room to improve efficiency and lower costs.
AI Services-as-Software forms a different and fast-growing category in healthcare technology. Instead of just giving software tools, AI SaaS solutions do tasks automatically that people used to do manually. These services offer results as a package instead of licenses. They usually charge based on how much work is done or results delivered.
AI Services-as-Software use advanced AI techniques like large language models (LLMs) and machine learning. They automate heavy administrative jobs like clinical documentation, claims auditing, scheduling, and coding. These solutions address about $1 trillion spent on healthcare administration and help with worker shortages by needing less manual labor.
Some AI Services-as-Software companies working in U.S. healthcare include:
These companies offer workflows that are either fully or partly automated and often include humans checking the work to ensure accuracy. This way, they offer different benefits compared to traditional SaaS.
One big difference between AI Services-as-Software and traditional SaaS is how fast they are adopted. Studies from Bessemer Venture Partners show that AI SaaS companies get to market faster, with sales cycles usually taking less than six months. Traditional healthcare SaaS sales usually take 12 to 18 months.
Shorter sales cycles come from several reasons:
Investment in AI health tech is growing fast. In 2024, 38% of new funding went to AI solutions. This shows investors believe AI SaaS will improve operations. AI SaaS startups also get higher valuations—2 to 5 times more than non-AI health tech companies—because of their growth and different delivery methods.
Along with faster adoption, AI Services-as-Software usually get higher contract amounts than traditional SaaS. This happens because AI SaaS focuses on outcomes and fits bigger operational budgets. Traditional SaaS contracts often charge per user or seat. These costs rise with more users but don’t always show clear value beyond software use.
AI Services-as-Software charge based on the value delivered, such as the number of clinical notes made or claims checked. This allows them to ask for higher prices that match improvements in operations.
This change to value-based pricing helps healthcare providers who must see clear ROI from tech investments, especially as they face tighter budgets. It also helps AI SaaS providers earn steady, transactional revenues that investors like.
AI Services-as-Software companies have different cost patterns than traditional SaaS. Their gross profit margins can vary a lot—from 10% to 90%—but average about 60-65%. This depends on things like:
These margins are a bit lower than traditional SaaS margins, which are usually over 70%. But lower margins reflect the extra work needed from humans to keep things accurate and follow rules in healthcare.
Managing these costs well is important for AI SaaS to grow. The best companies balance AI automation with careful human checks to keep accuracy and good profit margins.
It is important to understand workflow automation when comparing AI Services-as-Software to traditional SaaS in healthcare. Tasks like scheduling, documentation, billing, and compliance take a lot of time and affect worker productivity and patient care.
AI-driven automation helps healthcare providers by:
Traditional SaaS tools usually help staff but still need people to do much of the work. Partial automation and heavy reliance on manual labor limit their power to reduce administrative burdens significantly.
Medical practices and healthcare groups in the U.S. face growing needs to cut costs, better coordinate care, and meet changing rules. For administrators, owners, and IT managers, knowing the difference between AI Services-as-Software and traditional SaaS is very important to make good tech choices.
Key points to think about are:
Because healthcare IT budgets are tight, putting money into AI Services-as-Software might give better value by focusing on service results instead of just software tools. This matches bigger healthcare trends that focus on care value and operational efficiency.
Healthcare practices across the U.S. face a choice. Leaders must compare traditional SaaS models with AI Services-as-Software based on adoption speed, contract types, workflows, and finances. Understanding these differences is important for better performance and sustainability in today’s healthcare world.
This detailed comparison offers a clear way for healthcare managers, owners, and IT teams to evaluate software options and understand how AI-based automation is becoming part of healthcare management.
AI Services-as-Software leverage AI to autonomously perform tasks traditionally done by humans, delivering outcomes rather than just software tools. This model streamlines complex administrative workflows across providers, payers, and pharma, addressing the $1 trillion administrative spend and healthcare labor shortage by automating tasks like medical documentation, claims auditing, and back-office operations.
AI Services-as-Software show faster go-to-market trajectories and growth rates than traditional SaaS. They often sell outcomes, tapping larger budgets and bypassing long change management cycles by outsourcing end-to-end workflows, resulting in shorter sales cycles (<6 months) versus traditional 12-18 months and higher contract values.
There are three: Copilots, which augment and automate worker tasks; AI-first services, which fully outsource services with human-in-the-loop for quality assurance; and Agents, which aim to fully automate workflows, though fully autonomous agents in healthcare are still in development.
COGS drivers include AI model costs, computational resources, and human-in-the-loop expenses for quality assurance and reinforcement learning. Despite variability (10%-90% gross margins), average gross margins hover around 60-65%, reflecting differences in complexity, accuracy needs, and scale economies.
In 2024, 38% of healthcare investments targeted AI solutions, often yielding valuation multiples 2-5x higher than non-AI peers. This is fueled by large market potential, new business models, and urgent demand for AI to reduce costs and improve ROI in provider, payer, and pharma workflows.
Early-stage ventures struggle particularly at Series A and B funding rounds with longer times to raise capital, compared to other sectors, making efficient growth, cash preservation, and proving product-market fit critical for success in a tougher financing environment.
Emerging trends include payer administration insourcing using AI Services-as-Software, transparency tooling in pharmacy pricing and rebate management, AI-assisted clinical services to empower providers, and technologies enabling value-based care systems of record to support risk models and outcome measurement.
Instead of per-seat or license fees, these companies often get paid based on units of value delivered or outcomes, aligning with large OpEx and services budgets rather than IT budgets, facilitating procurement and potentially commanding premium pricing.
Examples include Abridge, automating clinical note generation; SmarterDx, AI-powered clinical review of medical claims; Qventus, automating surgery scheduling; and Plenful, focusing on back-office automation for specialty pharmacies.
AI Services-as-Software reduce the burden of repetitive administrative tasks on healthcare staff, allowing workforce reallocation to areas demanding human expertise while cutting operational costs in time-consuming processes like medical scribing, coding, and claims management.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
