In 2024, many state legislatures in the U.S. introduced new bills and laws about using AI in healthcare. They want to address issues like patient privacy, ethical use, transparency, stopping bias, and protecting patient rights. These laws try to balance AI’s benefits with limiting its possible harmful effects.
A common idea in 2024 is to set clear rules for AI use in healthcare. For example, Georgia’s Senate Resolution 476 created a group to develop ethical standards that protect people’s dignity, autonomy, and self-control when AI makes decisions. The goal is to keep human values important even as technology plays a bigger role.
States like Colorado have passed laws to stop AI from unfairly treating patients. Colorado’s SB24-205 says AI makers must explain how their systems work, do impact reports, and quickly tell users and authorities if they find risks of discrimination. This approach tries to find and reduce bias in AI that could hurt patient care or access.
New laws focus on making AI use clear to patients. California and Utah require that patients know when AI is part of their health communication. California’s Assembly Bill 3030 says health centers must tell patients if a message is from AI and explain how to reach a real person. Utah’s Artificial Intelligence Policy Act says people must be informed right away when they interact with AI instead of a human. This helps patients understand and agree to what they get.
Some states stress that AI should help, not replace, licensed health professionals when making clinical or service decisions. California Senate Bill 1120 requires that AI used to decide things like denying or changing healthcare services must be checked by licensed providers who know their specialty. This ensures experts review AI recommendations with a full understanding of the patient.
Rhode Island’s HB 8073 calls for AI tools, such as those that analyze breast tissue images, to be independently checked by qualified doctors before insurance covers them. This aims to give patients accurate and trustworthy test results when AI is involved.
Several states formed groups to study AI uses and make policy advice. Oregon’s HB 4153 set up a task force to clearly define AI terms for law clarity. Washington and West Virginia also created task forces to suggest best practices and laws to protect rights and data. These groups show careful planning based on expert help and ongoing review.
Healthcare leaders need to understand and follow these new rules. Many laws require medical practices to set new policies for transparency, telling patients, and human oversight. Administrators and IT staff should get ready to add these rules to daily work.
Healthcare groups can use AI-driven automation to meet rules and work efficiently. Tools like those from Simbo AI, which handle phone automation and AI answering, can help with routine tasks while following transparency and ethics laws.
Simbo AI’s tools can take care of regular patient calls, sending reminders and sorting patients first, while adding required disclaimers to AI messages. These systems tell patients they are talking to AI and can easily connect them to a human if asked. This meets laws like California Assembly Bill 3030 and Utah’s AI Policy Act.
Automated answering helps front-office staff focus on harder tasks but keeps a human approach when needed. This reduces wait times and makes sure patients quickly get answers or appointments, all while following AI disclosure rules.
Automation systems can create logs and reports of AI interactions. This helps administrators and compliance teams meet rules like Illinois’ Automated Decision Tools Act (HB 5116), which requires yearly impact reports and patient notifications about AI decisions affecting their care.
AI tools for operations can work with clinical AI by managing workflows, scheduling doctor reviews of AI recommendations, and tracking human oversight. This supports laws like California Senate Bill 1120, making sure AI decisions have human review.
California
Colorado
Illinois
Utah
Rhode Island
Other states
These new state laws create some challenges for healthcare operations:
The 2024 session of state legislatures shows a clear move to set practical rules that balance new AI uses with ethical protections and patient safety. Healthcare administrators, practice owners, and IT teams will need to keep track of these laws to use AI the right way. Automated tools like those from companies such as Simbo AI could help with these changes by adding transparency and improving workflows, so healthcare providers meet legal rules and patient needs well.
Legislative efforts focus on creating regulatory frameworks with oversight committees, preventing algorithmic discrimination, safeguarding data privacy, and ensuring ethical AI use. Many proposals mandate transparency, patient consent, and ethical standards for AI deployment in clinical and insurance settings.
It mandates health facilities using generative AI to generate patient communications include disclaimers notifying patients the communication is AI-generated and provide clear instructions for contacting a human healthcare provider.
It requires that decisions to deny, delay, or modify healthcare services be made by licensed physicians with relevant specialty and mandates AI algorithms used for utilization reviews to be fairly and equitably applied.
Developers must exercise reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination, disclose key information to deployers, provide documentation for impact assessments, publicly summarize system types, and report discrimination risks within 90 days of discovery to authorities and deployers.
The resolution created a study committee to explore AI’s potential and challenges, aiming to establish ethical standards that preserve individual dignity, autonomy, and self-determination, especially as AI transforms sectors like healthcare.
Deployers must conduct annual impact assessments and notify individuals impacted by consequential decisions influenced by automated tools, providing them with specific information about the tool’s use.
It established a Task Force on Artificial Intelligence to define AI-related terms for legislative clarity and to report findings and recommendations to legislative committees focusing on information management and technology.
It mandates insurance coverage for AI analysis of breast tissue diagnostics only if the AI-generated reviews are independently reviewed and approved by a qualified physician.
It requires clear and conspicuous disclosure that a person is interacting with generative AI, not a human, when generative AI is used to interact with individuals.
The legislature created a task force to define AI, identify overseeing agencies, develop public sector AI best practices, and recommend legislation protecting individual rights, civil liberties, and consumer data related to generative AI.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
