Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an important tool for healthcare groups like medical offices, hospitals, and clinics. It helps improve service and lowers paperwork. Many medical office managers and IT staff in the United States face a tough choice: should they build their own AI systems, or should they buy ready-made ones? This choice affects costs, how well the system works, and how successful it is over time.
This article looks at money and work factors in building versus buying AI. It focuses on front-office tasks such as answering phones. It also talks about hidden costs, security rules, and how AI affects the daily work in healthcare.
When medical offices think about AI phone answering systems, like those from Simbo AI, they need to know the total cost. Making a custom AI system can cost $100,000 to $500,000 or more to start. This includes making the software, testing it, and setting it up.
On the other hand, buying an AI system usually means paying monthly fees between $200 and $400 or more, depending on features. Even if initial costs seem lower, there are ongoing expenses to think about beyond monthly fees.
Studies show that 65% of software costs happen after the system is set up. This is because of maintenance, updates, following rules, and security. For custom AI, yearly upkeep might be between $9,000 and $15,000. Maintenance usually costs 10 to 20 percent of the original budget each year. If maintenance is delayed, future costs can rise by up to 600% because of old bugs and problems.
Healthcare practices must follow rules like HIPAA, so maintenance includes keeping security up to date. Some security checks, like SOC 2 certification, can cost over $100,000 and take months to finish.
One big reason why building AI inside the company can go over budget is hidden costs, especially for workers. AI experts are hard to find and usually cost $100,000 to $300,000 per year. Healthcare organizations often have tight budgets. Hiring and keeping AI workers adds costs like recruitment and training time where workers may not produce as much initially.
Also, many tech workers leave their jobs often. About 40% are looking for new jobs, and 75% expect to leave soon. This makes it hard to keep a strong in-house team.
Research says engineers spend about one-third of their time fixing old problems instead of creating new things. For healthcare IT teams, spending time on non-core tasks like phone answering can delay the project by six months or more, which can hurt revenue and patient care.
Speed matters when adding AI to medical offices. Front-office AI affects patient experience directly. Building a custom AI may take 9 to 18 months. This includes design, coding, testing, following rules, and changes along the way.
Buying ready AI systems usually cuts this time by about 70%. Setting up takes 2 to 6 months on average. Buying allows medical offices to quickly start using new technology, saving money and time soon.
For instance, offices using manual phone answering can miss appointments and overload staff. Using AI answering systems like Simbo AI can fix these problems right away and let staff focus more on patients than paperwork.
In U.S. healthcare, security and following rules are top priorities because of sensitive patient data. Practices must follow HIPAA, GDPR if they serve European patients, and other state laws. Not following these rules can lead to fines and damage to reputation.
Building custom AI lets organizations control how data is handled and kept private. This is important for high-risk patient information. They can add precise security controls from the start.
But keeping compliance requires ongoing work like security checks, paperwork, staff training, and certificate renewals. Compliance alone can cost from $10,000 to $100,000 every year, which is part of the total cost of ownership.
When buying AI, vendors usually handle most security and rule-following. This might reduce work for the medical office but brings risks like vendor lock-in and data exposure. Over 80% of organizations using cloud AI face vendor lock-in. This means switching vendors later can cost twice as much as the first investment.
Medical office managers should check vendor reputation, service agreements, and security certificates carefully before choosing AI solutions.
Some organizations build their own AI when it is very important to their business or unique workflows. For example, Netflix created custom AI for user recommendations, which is important for them.
In healthcare, large networks with big IT teams may build special AI for patient engagement using unique data sets vendors cannot access. This can give them an advantage.
But most small and medium healthcare offices do not have enough scale or skills for such custom AI projects. The risks and costs usually outweigh the benefits.
Medical office managers can avoid costly mistakes by carefully thinking about buying or building AI, such as phone answering automation. Common errors include:
One important use of AI is automating workflows, especially front-office jobs. Automating phone answering, appointment bookings, and patient communication helps staff avoid routine tasks.
Front-office AI uses language processing and machine learning to manage incoming calls. It answers questions, books appointments, and directs calls. Simbo AI offers such a system, aimed at automating patient contact without losing the personal touch needed in healthcare.
This automation cuts wait times, lowers dropped calls, and improves appointment rates. It helps medical receptionists focus on patients in person and handle complex requests.
Also, AI systems can connect with electronic health records and practice software. This keeps appointment info up to date, helps verify insurance, and keeps patient data safe.
AI automation is often more affordable and predictable when buying mature services. Vendors already include compliance, security, and software integration needed by U.S. healthcare, which lowers risks and costs.
One key factor in deciding to build or buy AI is the availability of skilled workers. About 34% of business leaders say their groups lack enough AI talent. Hiring people who can design and run AI is both costly and competitive.
To fix this, organizations do skill assessments to find knowledge gaps. This helps direct training or decide if buying AI is better than building it.
Even when buying AI, IT teams need skills for integration, customizing, monitoring, and improving the tools.
Healthcare groups in the U.S. work in a strict regulatory market with growing financial pressures. Investing in AI automation can improve efficiency and patient experience without big cost increases.
Practices must balance their tech skills, compliance rules, budget, and speed for new tools. Both building and buying AI can work, but they have different trade-offs in control, customization, long-term cost, and speed.
Sometimes a mixed approach is best. Develop core important features inside, and buy routine functions like phone answering from vendors.
Medical office managers, owners, and IT staff should look at all costs of AI projects. This includes starting costs, ongoing maintenance, security and compliance, hiring talent, and operational effects.
Recent data from 2024 shows 67% of AI projects fail because of wrong build or buy decisions. Maintenance usually takes 15-20% of the initial budget every year. Vendor AI solutions allow 5-7 months faster setup, which can make buying better for many healthcare providers.
Organizations without special AI needs and looking for quick improvements in patient communication and front-office work will likely benefit from proven AI platforms like Simbo AI instead of building their own. This choice lowers risks, cuts overall costs, and helps healthcare providers serve patients better in a more digital world.
The make or buy decision refers to whether an organization should build its own AI solutions in-house or purchase existing solutions from vendors. This choice is significant as it impacts cost, efficiency, and innovation capabilities.
Building AI solutions incurs hidden costs like ongoing maintenance, engineering hours, and technical debt. Buying solutions may have higher upfront costs but typically reduces ongoing maintenance and speeds up deployment.
Commercial tools such as SaaS platforms allow for quicker deployment of AI solutions compared to building from scratch, which requires time for development and customization.
Building AI solutions necessitates specialized AI skills that are often costly and require ongoing development. Teams must continuously upskill to keep pace with advancements in AI technology.
Organizations should build AI solutions when they possess a unique competitive advantage or specific expertise that enables them to create more effective solutions than what is available commercially.
Adopt an iterative process, starting with a proof-of-concept (POC) to validate ideas and identify potential challenges before fully committing resources to the project.
Skill assessments help organizations evaluate their technical capabilities, identify skill gaps, and guide employees in developing the necessary expertise for either building or implementing AI solutions.
Maintaining AI skills is crucial as organizations will still need expertise for managing and innovating with purchased solutions, ensuring they derive maximum value from those tools.
If lacking the necessary skills for deployment and management, it’s generally advisable to purchase existing AI solutions as they are often more cost-effective in the long run.
Organizations need to assess their resources, skills, and innovation requirements continuously, making informed decisions on how to incorporate AI into their strategies effectively.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
