Healthcare settings have many challenges for using AI. Clinical workflows change often and are different from place to place. Data comes from many sources and can be very different. Decisions often involve uncertainty and many people. To handle this, AI agents—software made to copy human decisions and interactions—need more than simple, fixed algorithms. They need designs that let them keep learning, reasoning, and working with different data and users. At the same time, they must follow health privacy rules and safety standards.
Alex G. Lee, a well-known health technology expert, suggests using a modular framework for healthcare AI agents to meet clinical needs. His design has six main parts:
This modular design helps AI agents change and grow. They can support different roles, from managing long-term illnesses to quick diagnostic help.
In healthcare IT, interoperability means different systems and software can talk to each other, share data, and use it well. Without good interoperability, AI agents may work alone and lose usefulness.
In the U.S. healthcare system, a common trend is adopting the HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. FHIR gives a steady way to show and share clinical data across platforms, helping AI tools and EHRs talk to each other. Recently, researchers at Kent State University made an open-source, agent-based framework. It links Large Language Models (LLMs), like OpenAI’s GPT-4, with FHIR data using the Model Context Protocol (MCP). This system shows how modular AI agents can get real-time clinical data and create clinical summaries for different users like doctors, caregivers, and patients.
The MCP-FHIR framework uses JSON configurations that do not need fixed API coding. This lets AI agents look up different resources, like medications, observations, and procedures, on the fly and give responses that fit the current context. Medical administrators and IT staff find this design helpful because it lowers maintenance needs, improves data accuracy, and strengthens clinical decision support (CDS) systems.
Different clinical cases need AI agents with different skills. Seven special types of AI agents fit the modular design and help healthcare:
Medical administrators and IT managers can use knowledge of these types to plan AI adoption that fits their needs and patients.
A key use of modular AI systems is in automating workflows and managing clinical tasks. Simbo AI is a company that focuses on front-office phone automation and answering services for healthcare using AI.
Front-office jobs in clinics include scheduling appointments, collecting information, and triage calls. Poor handling of these tasks can stress staff and slow work. AI conversational interfaces can answer common questions, pre-screen patients, and direct callers to the right places without needing humans. This cuts wait times and lets clinical staff focus on patient care.
Also, AI agents that handle tools can automate work like electronic documentation, ordering tests, and sending follow-up notices. Using interoperable setups with FHIR APIs, these agents get real-time patient data, send alerts, and help coordinate care.
Research on voice AI agents, like those from ARPA-H’s ADVOCATE program, shows they can save about eight minutes per patient visit. These AI agents combine data from wearables, EHRs, and patient inputs to provide continuous monitoring and decisions, while keeping human supervision to ensure safety.
These AI designs improve decision accuracy, reduce admin work, and make workflows smoother, giving clear operational benefits.
Using AI in healthcare needs strict following of safety, privacy, and regulations. Voice AI and other autonomous agents must work within clinical rules to avoid errors in high-risk areas. ARPA-H’s heart-focused projects stress the need for rules-compliant designs and real-time AI monitoring to find unusual behavior or drift.
Clinical testing is crucial. Large healthcare systems and universities like Duke and UC San Diego run trials to check safety of AI agents. Successful use depends on teamwork among doctors, AI makers, IT experts, and regulators. They must build AI that is clear, explainable, and trusted by clinicians.
The FDA’s Breakthrough Device Designation for digital medicines like Biofourmis’s automated heart failure drug management software shows how regulators support oversight while encouraging new development.
Healthcare administrators and IT managers in the U.S. need to understand technical specs, vendor skills, and integration issues for moving to AI workflows.
The joining of modular AI designs, interoperability standards like FHIR, and advanced language models marks big change in healthcare technology. AI agents working together in these setups will help U.S. healthcare respond better to complex clinical needs and changing patient demands. As AI agents become more independent, flexible, and connected, they could lower errors, improve personalized care, and assist clinicians at all care stages.
But success needs careful design that fits clinical workflows, follows rules, and respects ethics. For medical administrators, owners, and IT managers, this means balancing tech progress with practical use and steady oversight to create AI-enhanced healthcare that serves all patients well.
This article discusses the need for modular, interoperable AI architectures made for complex clinical settings in U.S. healthcare. Knowing about core parts like perception, conversation, interaction, tool integration, memory and learning, plus reasoning, along with different AI agent types, helps healthcare leaders make better choices about AI adoption. This can improve operational efficiency, clinical quality, and patient experience.
Healthcare AI agents need a modular, interoperable architecture composed of six core modules: Perception, Conversational Interfaces, Interaction Systems, Tool Integration, Memory & Learning, and Reasoning. This modular design enables intelligent agents to operate effectively within complex clinical settings with adaptability and continuous improvement.
Perception modules translate diverse clinical data, including structured EHRs, diagnostic images, and biosignals, into structured intelligence. They use multimodal fusion techniques to integrate data types, crucial for tasks like anomaly detection and complex pattern recognition.
Conversational modules enable natural language interaction with clinicians and patients, using LLMs for semantic parsing, intent classification, and adaptive dialogue management. This fosters trust, decision transparency, and supports high-stakes clinical communication.
Tool Integration modules connect AI reasoning with healthcare systems (lab software, imaging, medication calculators) through API handlers and tool managers. These modules enable agents to execute clinical actions, automate workflows, and make context-aware tool selections.
Memory and Learning modules maintain episodic and longitudinal clinical context, enabling chronic care management and personalized decisions. They support continuous learning through feedback loops, connecting short-term session data and long-term institutional knowledge.
Reasoning modules transform multimodal data and contextual memory into clinical decisions using flexible, evidence-weighted inference that handles uncertainty and complex diagnostics, evolving from static rules to multi-path clinical reasoning.
ReAct + RAG agents uniquely combine reasoning and acting with retrieval-augmented generation to manage multi-step, ambiguous clinical decisions by integrating external knowledge dynamically, enhancing decision support in critical care and rare disease triage.
Self-Learning agents evolve through longitudinal data, patient behavior, and outcomes, using memory and reward systems to personalize care paths continuously, enabling adaptive and highly autonomous interventions for complex chronic conditions.
Tool-Enhanced agents orchestrate diverse digital healthcare tools in complex environments (e.g., emergency departments), integrating APIs and managing workflows to automate clinical tasks and optimize operational efficiency based on contextual learning.
Environment-Controlling agents adjust physical conditions such as lighting, noise, and temperature based on real-time physiological and environmental sensor data. They optimize healing environments by integrating patient preferences and feedback for enhanced comfort and safety.