Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning models, like large language models such as ChatGPT and Bard, and AI automation tools, are becoming more common in healthcare. These tools can help people get health information more easily, speed up administrative tasks, improve medical diagnoses, and help areas with fewer resources.
But the World Health Organization (WHO) asks that we be careful about using new AI systems too quickly in healthcare. They worry that using untested AI could cause mistakes, harm patients, and make people trust technology less. This concern is important in the U.S., where healthcare providers have to follow many rules, like HIPAA, which protects patient information.
To solve these problems, U.S. leaders are encouraged to ask for clear proof that AI helps before allowing its wide use in healthcare. This means carefully checking how AI is developed, tested, and used in clinics.
One big topic in AI policy is making sure ethical rules are part of how AI is made and used. Research shows AI in healthcare has ethical issues such as bias, unfairness, privacy problems, and a lack of transparency. For example, Matthew G. Hanna and his colleagues point out the need to check AI systems regularly to find and fix bias caused by unbalanced training data, design decisions, or different clinical practices.
A useful guide created by Haytham Siala, Yichuan Wang, and others is called the SHIFT framework. It stands for sustainability, human-centeredness, inclusiveness, fairness, and transparency. These five ideas help healthcare groups and AI developers work with AI in a responsible way:
The SHIFT framework can guide medical staff when choosing AI tools like those from Simbo AI to make sure they follow these ethical ideas.
A big problem with AI in healthcare is bias. Bias means some groups might get better or worse results unfairly. Bias shows up in three main ways:
When bias happens, patients may get unfair care, and trust in AI can go down. Healthcare leaders and IT managers should pick AI tools that openly show how they were made and what is done to fix bias. They should also keep checking AI during use to catch problems early.
AI systems sometimes work like “black boxes,” where it is hard to know how they make decisions. This is risky in healthcare. Being clear about how AI works helps users understand and trust it. If doctors can explain AI’s advice, they can decide when to accept or reject it.
Rules for AI should require developers to share how their algorithms work, what data is used, and what limits exist. In the U.S., where laws protect patients and require honesty, transparency helps with audits and following rules like HIPAA.
Using AI in healthcare brings challenges with patient consent and privacy. WHO says some large AI models may use data without clear patient permission, which can risk private health details. This is a serious issue in the U.S., where privacy laws are strict and patient rights are important.
Healthcare administrators must ensure AI companies protect data well and clearly tell patients how their health information is used. Policies should require patients to agree before their data is used with AI and keep information secret to avoid leaks or misuse.
Healthcare in the U.S. follows rules from groups like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Office for Civil Rights (OCR), and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). AI tools are interesting for business, but regulators want strong ways to check and approve AI used in medical decisions or admin work.
Right now, the FDA uses a system based on risk to check AI software for safety, effectiveness, and security. But AI changes fast, so policies need to keep up with new challenges and require ongoing reviews.
Health administrators and IT teams should work with legal experts to stay updated on rules. Choosing AI with official approvals shows a focus on patient safety and lowers legal risks.
AI can improve front-office healthcare tasks like scheduling, patient check-in, insurance checks, and answering phones. Simbo AI offers AI phone systems to help medical offices run better, reduce waiting times, and keep patients happy.
Using AI in these areas needs careful planning to fit existing electronic health record (EHR) systems and follow privacy laws. Important points are:
By following ethical rules and laws, healthcare groups in the U.S. can use AI while protecting patients and helping staff.
Making AI work well in healthcare needs constant checking and teamwork. This involves:
Responsible AI oversight needs support from healthcare workers, administrators, policymakers, and tech companies across the U.S. When AI follows ethical, legal, and operational rules, it can help doctors and nurses do their jobs better.
The WHO advocates for cautious, safe, and ethical use of AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), to protect human well-being, safety, autonomy, and public health while promoting transparency, inclusion, expert supervision, and rigorous evaluation.
Rapid, untested deployment risks causing errors by healthcare workers, potential patient harm, erosion of trust in AI, and delays in realizing long-term benefits due to lack of rigorous oversight and evaluation.
AI training data may be biased, leading to misleading or inaccurate outputs that threaten health equity and inclusiveness, potentially causing harmful decisions or misinformation in healthcare contexts.
LLMs can produce responses that sound authoritative and plausible but may be factually incorrect or contain serious errors, especially in medical advice, posing risks to patient safety and clinical decision-making.
LLMs may use data without prior consent and fail to adequately protect sensitive or personal health information users provide, raising significant privacy, consent, and ethical issues.
They can generate convincing disinformation in text, audio, or video forms that are difficult to distinguish from reliable content, potentially spreading false health information and undermining public trust.
Clear evidence of benefit, patient safety, and protection measures must be established through rigorous evaluation before large-scale implementation by individuals, providers, or health systems.
The six principles are: protect autonomy; promote human well-being, safety, and the public interest; ensure transparency, explainability, and intelligibility; foster responsibility and accountability; ensure inclusiveness and equity; and promote responsive and sustainable AI.
Transparency and explainability ensure that AI decisions and outputs can be understood and scrutinized by users and experts, fostering trust, accountability, and safer clinical use.
Policymakers should emphasize patient safety and protection, enforce ethical governance, and mandate thorough evaluation before commercializing AI tools, ensuring responsible integration within healthcare systems.