Patient-reported outcomes are health details patients give about how they feel and function related to their sickness or treatment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says PROs are any reports on a patient’s health coming straight from the patient without anyone else changing it. These reports show important results for patients, like pain relief, mental and physical health, and how happy they are with treatment.
PROs are used more and more in clinical trials and are important in patient-focused care. Using PRO data helps doctors make better decisions and adjust treatments to fit what patients want and experience in real life.
Many groups provide materials, guides, toolkits, and training to help healthcare teams use PRO methods right. Three main groups are the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Core with the NIH Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory.
PCORI works on improving health research with real involvement from patients, caregivers, doctors, and others. They offer an Engagement Tool and Resource Repository with over 350 materials like manuals, toolkits, templates, videos, and training slides to help teams do research that centers on patients.
Key PCORI resources for PROs include:
These tools help healthcare groups use PRO data while keeping patient involvement ethical and effective.
ISPOR offers guides, education, and reports for people working in health economics and outcomes research. They have short courses, webinars, and reports that explain how to collect, combine, and study PRO data carefully.
Important points from ISPOR include:
Hospital leaders and IT managers can learn from ISPOR to better understand PRO data and use it in clinical workflows.
This group helps pick and prepare PRO measures and build systems that work with electronic health records (EHRs). They focus on joining patient-reported data with existing healthcare technology to reduce errors and use data better.
They also talk to doctors to find out problems in using PRO systems and share ways to fix these problems. Their work supports mixed methods of collecting PRO data, using electronic, in-person, and telehealth ways. This helps reach rural and less-served groups.
Research from this group looks at:
These resources help healthcare leaders who want to start or grow PRO data systems.
Using PROs in healthcare brings challenges like how to collect, manage, and have data ready in time for decisions. Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools can help healthcare groups handle these challenges.
For example, Simbo AI offers front-office phone automation using AI. Many healthcare providers get lots of patient calls every day. AI systems like Simbo AI’s can handle simple questions, freeing staff to work on tasks that need human skill.
AI automation can:
AI tools help healthcare technology programs put patient-centered care into daily work. Medical leaders and IT teams should think about working with AI companies like Simbo AI to run things better and keep patient data accurate.
Medical practice leaders and IT managers in the U.S. should think about these key points to successfully use PRO methods with education and automation:
Patient-reported outcomes play a big role in patient-centered care and research. Using educational tools from PCORI, ISPOR, and federal groups along with AI automation gives healthcare organizations the tools to use PRO data well. Combining education and technology can help clinical decisions, patient involvement, and fair care for different groups.
In the changing U.S. healthcare system, medical managers, owners, and IT staff have an important part in bringing in these methods and tools. Doing this helps create healthcare systems that respond well, run efficiently, and listen to patients’ health experiences.
PCOs are measurable health outcomes that are significant and meaningful to patients, consisting of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and other variables collected from different sources.
The FDA defines PRO data as any report of a patient’s health condition status provided directly by the patient, without clinician interpretation.
PROs are utilized to inform patient-centered care, guide clinical decisions, and influence health policy, becoming increasingly integral in research.
Best practices include ensuring the appropriateness of PRO measures, stimulating the development of new instruments, and curating existing measures effectively.
Efficient, high-quality PRO data collection systems are designed to be compatible with EHRs, facilitating better integration of patient-reported data in clinical settings.
Challenges include identifying suitable PRO measures, ensuring proper data collection methods, and overcoming barriers related to integration within healthcare systems.
Statistical analyses are conducted to evaluate PRO endpoints’ significance and impact on clinical outcomes in pragmatic trials.
The Core collaborates with clinicians and researchers to share insights on PRO usage, monitor implementation progress, and provide guidelines for best practices.
The EGD aims to assist in incorporating PROs into comparative effectiveness research, particularly in fields like adult oncology.
Resources include living textbooks, white papers, toolkits, workshops, and presentations aimed at enhancing the understanding and application of PRO methodologies.