Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare does not always show clear financial gains right away. It also doesn’t work the same in every setting. Dr. Spencer Dorn, a healthcare researcher, says that measuring return on investment (ROI) for AI is complicated. This is because many things affect the outcome. These include who uses the AI tool (like a doctor, nurse, or office worker), where it is used, how long it is used, and how the results are measured.
For example, an AI tool that writes administrative messages automatically can save time for front-desk workers, but it may not help much in making medical decisions. On the other hand, AI that summarizes patient histories is useful for doctors managing long-term or complex cases. One AI tool might work well in one hospital department but not in another. This depends on how the work flows and how experienced the staff is.
Healthcare groups often find it hard to see exactly how much of the productivity or cost savings come from AI. This is because AI works best when it fits well with current work steps, staff skills, payment methods, and patient care goals. In payment systems that pay doctors for the number of services rather than results, AI time savings may not show benefits right away.
Dr. Bimal Desai, a child health and informatics expert, says AI tools need to be chosen based on who will use them. For example:
Medical practice administrators and IT managers need to find which parts of their practice have the most work or delays. They should then pick AI tools that help those areas the most.
Administrative work takes up a lot of money in U.S. healthcare. It is estimated that over $400 billion, or about 30% of healthcare costs each year, goes to clerical tasks. These include scheduling, billing, claims, and data entry. AI can help cut these costs.
For instance, AI phone answering services for front-office desks are useful. Companies like Simbo AI offer this kind of AI automation. These systems handle many calls, letting staff focus on harder questions that need a personal touch.
By using AI to answer simple patient questions like confirming appointments or office hours, healthcare groups lower call wait times, reduce staff stress, and improve patient experience. These improvements help save money indirectly by helping staff work better and keeping patients satisfied.
One problem with using AI in healthcare is weak governance. A survey of 233 health leaders showed that 88% had used AI tools, but only 18% had good governance plans. Without strong rules, AI can cause problems or ethical risks.
Dr. Deepak Patil says that safe AI use needs trust, fairness, transparency, and accountability. This means:
The example of IBM Watson for Oncology shows what can go wrong if governance is weak. Poor oversight and bad data caused it to fail. Trust dropped and the project was stopped.
U.S. healthcare leaders need strong governance to keep AI tools following rules, ethics, and operational needs.
More than half of patients in a European Commission survey said they felt uneasy about AI being part of their care. However, 53% said they would be more okay with it if they gave informed consent. This shows that being clear and open with patients is important.
Beyond following laws like HIPAA, healthcare providers should talk to patients about how AI helps clinical or administrative tasks but does not replace human decisions. This openness can stop distrust and pushback.
AI must also be checked to make sure it does not make health inequalities worse. AI trained on limited or biased data can harm some groups. Healthcare leaders should pick AI that uses diverse data and works well for all people.
AI automation helps beyond medical tasks. It also improves how healthcare places run. According to Boston Consulting Group and Amzur Technologies, 70% of AI problems come from people and processes, not the machines or codes. So, making AI fit into workflows and gaining user acceptance is key to ROI.
Front-office work like patient intake, phone answering, and scheduling take a lot of staff time. AI phone systems can work all day, answer common questions, and send urgent calls to the right people.
In clinics, AI tools like ambient scribes listen and write notes during doctor visits. This lets doctors spend more time with patients instead of writing notes.
AI also helps with patient flow and staff scheduling to use resources better and reduce waiting times.
Good AI automation means:
Simbo AI’s phone automation shows how AI can support office work to save time, help patients get care, and lower costs.
Clinical AI that clearly leads to ROI includes medical imaging and diagnostic support. The medical imaging AI market in the U.S. is expected to grow from $0.98 billion in 2023 to more than $11.76 billion by 2033. AI can detect early-stage diseases like heart problems with up to 94% accuracy. This helps lower mistakes and reduces tiredness for radiologists.
Healthcare groups that use both clinical and administrative AI get wider benefits by improving patient outcomes and operations.
Revenue cycle work also benefits from AI that handles claims checking, coding, and payment predictions. This makes reimbursements faster and cuts mistakes.
Experts like Ramakrishna Akula say it is important to involve different leaders in AI projects. This includes Chief Financial Officers (CFOs), Chief Medical Information Officers (CMIOs), and Chief Operating Officers (COOs). This helps make sure AI projects match bigger goals like value-based care, financial health, and patient flow.
When goals align, organizations can set clear shared targets for ROI and patient impact. This encourages long-term support and use of resources.
Dr. Lukasz Kowalczyk recommends quick AI rollouts with ways to measure AI performance called “AI Evals.” These check how AI works live, gather feedback, and find problems early, such as wrong or biased results.
This ongoing approach helps make AI safer, more reliable, and easier to use. It also builds trust with doctors and raises ROI over time.
In U.S. healthcare, using AI tools means more than just adding new technology. Practice administrators, owners, and IT managers need to match AI tools to the right roles and settings. This focused way helps show where AI can lower costs, save staff time, improve workflows, and help patients.
Making governance plans based on trust, fairness, transparency, and accountability helps protect AI investments and answers patient and staff worries.
Adding AI workflows in front-office tasks—like AI phone answering systems from companies such as Simbo AI—gives quick operational benefits by cutting costs and making patient care easier to reach.
Finally, leadership involvement and ongoing evaluation during AI use improve long-term ROI and keep the project aligned with the organization’s goals. This way, AI acts as a useful helper instead of a disruptive problem.
Understanding these points helps healthcare groups in the U.S. use AI not just as a new trend but as a responsible tool that improves healthcare and business work.
For medical practice administrators and IT leaders, the choice to use clinical AI tools should be based on clear evidence of benefits by role, readiness for governance, and workflow effect. This approach can move AI work from costly experiments to lasting improvements that matter.
Organizations must evaluate specific AI tool benefits relative to roles and settings. For instance, AI auto-drafting for administrative messages proves more effective than for medical advice. Use-case and user-specific performance data is essential for aligning investment with actual clinical benefit to maximize ROI.
ROI measurement is complicated by varied perspectives on cost and benefit, unclear payers, differing time horizons, baselines, and evaluation metrics. Additionally, AI’s unreliability in critical areas, modest productivity gains, downstream workflow constraints, and fee-for-service misalignments hinder straightforward ROI assessment.
Trust, fairness (equity), transparency, and accountability are fundamental. This involves rigorous validation, bias assessments, clear documentation, stakeholder engagement, ongoing monitoring, and assigning responsibility for AI outcomes to ensure safe and ethical AI deployment.
Failures typically stem from lack of trust due to opaque algorithms or bias, insufficient strategic leadership, poor data quality, and regulatory uncertainties. Weak governance structures lead to flawed algorithms, loss of trust, and abandonment of AI solutions.
AI enables predictive analytics to foresee patient risks, personalize treatment plans, optimize resource allocation, and reduce unnecessary tests, leading to improved outcomes, fewer hospital stays, and decreased wasteful spending, thereby driving cost savings.
Patients often feel uncomfortable with AI use due to concerns over autonomy, informed consent, and insufficient understanding of AI’s role. Transparent communication and clear consent processes are essential to build patient trust and acceptance.
AI trained on geographically or demographically limited data risks discriminatory outputs and exacerbating health disparities. Addressing diversity in data and ensuring equitable AI performance is crucial to prevent a digital divide and promote fair healthcare access.
AI Evals involve monitoring AI performance in production with guardrails, enabling real-world learning on specific data. They ensure AI’s reliability, safety, and suitability in the high-stakes clinical environment, which is critical for successful AI adoption and ROI realization.
With multiple departments experimenting independently, AI risks bias, errors, and workflow disruptions. Inclusive governance ensures aligned policies, data use oversight, risk management, and comprehensive stakeholder involvement to safeguard AI benefits and mitigate harms.
Leaders should align AI tools with workforce needs, prioritize deploying trusted teammates rather than disruptive tools, invest in professional training, ensure data interoperability, implement governance frameworks emphasizing transparency and accountability, and focus on human-centered AI supporting clinician decision-making.