No-shows are patients who do not come to their scheduled medical appointments and do not tell the office ahead of time. These missed visits cause problems for healthcare providers. Studies show no-shows waste time for doctors and staff, leave appointment slots empty, increase costs, and delay care. Providers find it hard to keep things running smoothly when patients cancel at the last minute or just do not show up. This also makes wait times longer for other patients.
Research from places like Duke Health and Corewell Health shows that no-shows cause money problems and lower the quality of care. For example, Duke Health used weather information and patient habits in their prediction models. This helped send better reminders that lowered no-show rates. Corewell Health used prediction tools to save millions by scheduling and engaging patients ahead of time.
In the last ten years, machine learning has become useful for finding patterns that show when patients might miss appointments. These methods look at past appointment data, patient information, and other factors to guess who might not come.
A common model, Logistic Regression, appears in about 68% of studies from 2010 to 2025. It gives clear chances that a patient will no-show, so many health clinics prefer it. Other techniques like tree-based models, ensembles, and deep learning are gaining use as they handle complex data better.
Models predicting no-shows have accuracy from 52% up to almost 99.5%. Scores like the Area Under the Curve (AUC) usually fall between 0.75 and 0.95, which means they can tell who is likely to miss appointments well. Things like how far in advance the appointment is booked, the day of the week, season, and weather also help make predictions more accurate by showing real patient habits.
Using machine learning to predict no-shows faces problems in real healthcare settings. The ITPOSMO framework helps find issues by looking at seven key areas important for technology use:
Data quality is one of the biggest problems. Studies show missing or bad patient data lowers how well models predict. Clinics need to improve how they collect and manage data to keep it complete and correct. Using interoperability standards like Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) can help improve data sharing between different systems.
Class imbalance is a technical problem too. Since no-shows happen less often than attendances, the data can be uneven. Researchers use methods like oversampling rare cases or making synthetic data to balance the sets. This helps models notice no-show patterns better and predict more correctly.
Putting machine learning into current healthcare systems is difficult. Even with strong algorithms, models must fit with EHRs, scheduling programs, and patient communication tools while following strict privacy rules. Some places like Duke Health and Kaiser Permanente show it can work by matching technical ability with organizational support and thereby save money and improve patient care.
Some companies have built AI tools to help front-office work and reduce no-shows at the same time as predictions. Simbo AI is an example that creates systems to automate phone answering and patient messages.
Simbo AI’s tools manage calls, send appointment reminders, and help reschedule without adding work for staff. Their technology uses voice recognition and natural language processing so patients can confirm or cancel appointments automatically. This cuts down manual work and makes reminders happen on time based on risk scores.
Such automation connects prediction results with actions. It helps clinics fill appointment slots faster, handle cancellations smoothly, and engage patients better.
Using AI tools like Simbo AI along with prediction models gives benefits to clinic managers and IT staff in the U.S. It can improve front-office work, increase patient visits, and reduce lost revenue from empty appointments.
Patients miss appointments for different reasons depending on place, time, and other specific factors. Research shows things like day of the week, season, how far in advance the appointment was booked, and weather affect no-show rates.
For example, clinics in areas with harsh winters may see more no-shows during cold months. Knowing these details lets machine learning models adjust for the situation and predict better.
Health organizations that want to use machine learning should include local and time-related factors when building models. This helps make reminders and scheduling plans fit the clinic’s specific needs, leading to more patients attending and better use of resources.
As machine learning grows in healthcare, ethical use is very important. It is necessary to make AI methods clear, protect patient privacy, and be fair to all patients. This builds trust in the technology.
Future work on no-show prediction suggests adding more focus on organization needs, improving data collection, and setting rules for handling unbalanced data. Transfer learning—where a model trained in one place is changed for use in another—could help make predictions work across many clinics.
Working together among IT, doctors, and managers is needed to use no-show predictions well. Ongoing checks and updates to models will keep them accurate as patients and health operations change.
Medical office leaders and IT managers in the U.S. should consider these points from machine learning research and the ITPOSMO study:
By dealing with challenges shown by the ITPOSMO framework and combining machine learning with AI-driven automation, U.S. clinics can manage patient no-shows better. This approach helps use resources well, lower costs, and improve patient experiences.
Predicting patient no-shows is crucial as it helps healthcare systems address challenges such as wasted resources, increased operational costs, and disrupted continuity of care.
The review encompasses research from 2010 to 2025, analyzing 52 publications on the use of machine learning for predicting patient no-shows.
Logistic Regression is identified as the most commonly used model, appearing in 68% of the studies reviewed.
The best-performing models achieved AUC scores between 0.75 and 0.95, indicating their predictive accuracy.
The accuracy of the models ranged from 52% to 99.44%, highlighting varying effectiveness across different studies.
Common challenges include data imbalance, data quality and completeness, model interpretability, and integration with existing healthcare systems.
The ITPOSMO framework (Information, Technology, Processes, Objectives, Staffing, Management, and Other Resources) is used to assess the landscape of current ML approaches.
Future directions include improving data collection methods, incorporating organizational factors, ensuring ethical implementations, and standardizing approaches for data imbalance.
Researchers have employed a variety of feature selection methods to enhance model efficiency, addressing challenges like class imbalance.
By leveraging machine learning, healthcare providers can improve resource allocation, enhance the quality of patient care, and advance predictive analytics.