The way healthcare providers get paid in the United States is changing. For a long time, providers were paid for each service or procedure they did. This is called fee-for-service (FFS). It pays for quantity, not quality. But now, the system is moving toward value-based care (VBC). In this model, providers are paid based on the quality of care and how well patients do, not how many services are done. This change affects how medical offices handle billing and payments, called revenue cycle management (RCM).
Medical practice managers, owners, and IT staff need to know how value-based care affects RCM. They also need to learn what to change to stay financially stable while giving good care. This article looks at the move to value-based care, its effect on RCM, and how artificial intelligence (AI) and automation can help.
In the fee-for-service system, healthcare providers get paid for each test, visit, or procedure. This encourages seeing many patients or doing many procedures, even if they don’t improve health. Since medical costs have been going up, this system has faced criticism for causing extra procedures and higher spending.
Value-based care tries to fix these problems by paying for better health outcomes at controlled costs. Instead of paying per service, value-based care focuses on quality. This includes patient satisfaction, fewer hospital readmissions, and following clinical rules. Programs like the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) give rewards or penalties based on how well providers do on quality measures.
This change means providers must have good clinical results, efficient care delivery, and patient participation to get full payment. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in the biggest Shared Savings Program saved $2.1 billion net and shared $3.1 billion in 2023. This shows value-based care’s financial effects.
Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) used to focus on sending claims quickly and collecting payments. Now, it faces new challenges with value-based care. The main issue is that RCM must include patient results and quality data in billing. This needs clinical documentation that is accurate, quick, and matches the financial information.
Key challenges for RCM in value-based care are:
Despite these challenges, value-based RCM has benefits like lower costs from fewer denials, better patient results through coordinated care, and less administrative work using automation.
To do well in value-based care, medical practices must change how they handle revenue cycles. Some useful ways are:
Technology plays a key role in changing RCM for value-based care. AI and automation tools help improve efficiency, accuracy, and compliance.
Ways AI and automation affect RCM include:
Using AI and automation well can lower costs, increase accuracy, and maintain compliance in a complex payment system. This also lets practices focus more on patient care than paperwork.
Healthcare costs in the U.S. keep rising quickly. PwC predicts costs will grow about 8.5% for group health plans and 7.5% for individual plans in 2026, close to 2025 levels. Drug costs, especially for new medicines like GLP-1 drugs, went up by $50 billion in 2024, more than double the 2023 increase.
Hospitals and health systems have shrinking profit margins, dropping to 2.1% in 2024 from 7% in 2019. This puts pressure on both providers and payers to control costs. Optimizing revenue cycle management has become very important to improve payments and deal with financial stress.
Behavioral health services grew rapidly. Inpatient claims rose nearly 80% from 2023 to 2024, and outpatient claims went up about 40%. This growth makes clinical and financial work more complex.
Value-based contracts and other payment models try to put cost pressure back on providers and improve payment accuracy. Healthcare groups use tools like AI to better manage utilization, audits before payment, and care coordination. Their goal is to control costs without losing quality.
Also, use of biosimilar drugs, such as ones like Humira, has increased a lot. This saves money and affects drug cost trends. Health plans add strategies like pharmacy benefit management, prior authorization, and extra services like nutrition counseling to better control costs and link payments with care quality.
Federal spending changes, such as possible cuts to Medicaid and ACA subsidies, might raise the number of uninsured people. This will make providers work harder to get better commercial payer payments through stronger revenue cycle methods and rate talks to keep financial health.
Medical practices in the U.S. moving to value-based care must take practical steps:
Since value-based care focuses on outcomes and efficiency, managing revenue cycles means more than just billing. It needs teamwork across clinical, operational, and financial areas.
Medical administrators, practice owners, and IT managers should know that the switch from fee-for-service to value-based care is not just about payment change. It is a big change in how healthcare is given and paid for. By changing revenue cycle management with connected data systems, smart analytics, and workflow automation, practices can improve financial health while meeting the need for better and cost-effective care.
VBC primarily serves as a reimbursement model rewarding providers for adhering to clinical guidelines and achieving population health metrics, rather than simply rewarding service volume. It emphasizes improved overall health rather than individual patient outcomes directly tied to financial incentives.
The transition to VBC requires sophisticated data analytics for accurate measurement of patient outcomes and care costs, demanding significant investment in technology and the development of new workflows for care coordination and population health management.
Data analytics can uncover trends and patterns in large datasets, allowing healthcare organizations to proactively address issues like rising denial rates and optimize financial performance through targeted interventions and improved operational processes.
BI tools enable data-driven decision-making, forecasting future performance by analyzing historical data. This aids in resource allocation and identifying trends such as potential claim denials, facilitating early intervention and improved reimbursement processes.
KPIs in RCM include claim submission rates, denial rates, and collection times. Monitoring these indicators helps organizations quickly identify and resolve issues that deviate from targets, ensuring timely financial performance.
RCM must transition from a transactional to a strategic function by integrating clinical, operational, and financial expertise. This holistic approach helps optimize claim coding, billing, and submission while addressing root causes of RCM challenges in VBC.
HCC coding provides a comprehensive snapshot of patient health, supporting better resource prediction and enabling RCM to connect clinical outcomes with financial performance, essential for assessing effectiveness in VBC.
Aligning patient care with financial metrics validates VBC effectiveness. Without this connection, the impact of VBC on cost reduction and care quality remains uncertain, making RCM insights crucial.
The convergence of RCM and advanced technologies, such as AI and automation, drives innovation in care coordination and risk management, positioning health systems strategically for success in the evolving VBC landscape.
The ultimate goal of improving RCM in VBC is to optimize financial performance by ensuring accurate reimbursement while enhancing patient outcomes through effective financial processes and data-driven decision-making.