Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are changing healthcare in the United States quickly. Medical practice administrators, clinic owners, and IT managers need to know how to safely add these new tools to healthcare work. Startups and small companies play an important role in AI development. They offer new ways to improve patient access, scheduling, diagnostics, and front-office work. However, U.S. rules can be complicated and sometimes slow down new AI healthcare solutions.
To help, lawmakers have proposed the SANDBOX Act. This Act would create regulated testing places called “regulatory sandboxes.” These let startups and small businesses develop and test AI technologies under federal watch. These places try to balance helping new ideas grow with keeping patients safe and private. This article looks at how such testing places support responsible AI in healthcare and meet the needs of healthcare leaders and workers.
Startups and small companies making AI for healthcare face big problems. The U.S. healthcare system has many rules at federal, state, and local levels. Most rules protect patients and privacy, but they can also slow down new ideas. Startups usually do not have enough resources to handle these rules. This delays testing and launching products.
The SANDBOX Act, part of Senator Ted Cruz’s AI plan, offers a way forward. It plans for “regulatory sandboxes” where startups can test AI healthcare products in safe areas with federal watch. These sandboxes make it easier to follow rules while still protecting people from health risks, safety issues, and fraud.
In these places, innovators can try and improve their products without having to follow all the strict rules at first. The Act also works to stop conflicting state laws by creating one national set of rules for AI development. This helps with concerns about different state laws causing confusion.
For medical practice leaders and IT managers, having AI tools that work well and are safe matters a lot. Here are some main benefits of regulatory sandboxes:
The SANDBOX Act says that being in regulatory sandboxes does not free innovators from responsibility. Startups still have to answer if their AI causes harm during testing. This rule encourages high standards even when rules are flexible.
Federal agencies watch these sandboxes and can stop or change activities that risk health, safety, or ethics. This helps ensure AI does not break privacy or fairness rules. The Act also works to keep the competition fair by avoiding different laws in different states.
Groups like the Coalition for Health AI (CHAI) support the SANDBOX Act. They say it will build trust in AI healthcare by focusing on safety and good results. Big tech companies like Meta, Microsoft, and Arm also support the sandbox plan because it can speed up careful AI use with clear rules.
The idea of AI regulatory sandboxes is not only in the U.S. Many countries have similar programs for new tech in healthcare and finance.
For instance, Japan started a regulatory sandbox in 2018 open to global participants. This framework allows testing ideas like AI, blockchain, and IoT in healthcare and other fields. In Europe, the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act sets up AI sandboxes for startups and SMEs. These sandboxes also make sure to follow strict safety and privacy laws like GDPR.
Over 50 countries now have fintech regulatory sandboxes, and many use this model for AI in healthcare and other services. These examples show both benefits and challenges, such as legal risks, data privacy, and uneven law enforcement.
These international programs offer useful lessons for U.S. healthcare leaders and IT teams. Good innovation happens when rules are clear, support safety and openness, and allow new products to reach the market.
AI is being used more to automate work in healthcare. For medical practice leaders and IT managers, AI automation can make operations smoother, cut costs, and improve patient satisfaction.
Examples of AI workflow automations for front-office work include:
When AI tools are tested and improved in regulated places, they work better, are easier to use, and follow healthcare laws. This gives practice leaders confidence that patient data and legal rules are protected when using AI.
Even with regulated testing, medical leaders need to watch some important things:
New regulatory frameworks like the SANDBOX Act show changes coming for healthcare AI in the U.S. These controlled testing places give startups and small companies a clearer way to build safe and useful AI tools for healthcare.
Medical leaders, clinic owners, and IT managers play an important role by learning about these opportunities and picking AI tools that meet safety and privacy rules. With the right use, AI automations—like phone answering from Simbo AI—can improve work efficiency and patient experience.
As AI grows, regulated environments will be important places for new technology that respects patient safety, privacy, and ethics. This balance helps make sure AI healthcare tools benefit many and support better and more efficient care across the United States.
The EU AI Act is the world’s first comprehensive regulation aimed at governing the development and use of artificial intelligence within the European Union. It establishes a risk-based classification system to ensure AI systems are safe, transparent, and non-discriminatory, promoting responsible AI innovation across sectors including healthcare.
AI systems are classified based on the risk they pose: unacceptable risk (which is banned), high risk (subject to strict obligations and assessment), and minimal risk (less stringent compliance). This ensures tailored regulation depending on potential harm to users.
AI applications involving cognitive behavioural manipulation, social scoring, biometric identification and categorisation of individuals, and real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces are banned due to their risk of violating fundamental rights and personal privacy, with limited law enforcement exceptions.
High-risk AI includes systems integrated into products under EU product safety laws (like medical devices) and those operating in critical areas such as infrastructure, education, employment, essential services, law enforcement, and legal assistance, requiring registration and ongoing assessment.
Transparency obligations include disclosing when content is AI-generated, especially for generative AI like ChatGPT, preventing illegal output, and labeling AI-modified media (e.g., deepfakes). High-impact general-purpose AI models must undergo thorough evaluation and incident reporting.
The Act encourages innovation by mandating that national authorities provide testing environments simulating real-world conditions. This enables startups and SMEs to develop and test AI models responsibly before public release, fostering competitive AI development in Europe.
The AI Act became partially applicable in February 2025 for bans on unacceptable-risk AI. Transparency rules apply 12 months after enforcement, while high-risk AI system obligations have a 36-month compliance period, allowing gradual adaptation for providers and users.
A parliamentary working group, in cooperation with the European Commission’s EU AI office, oversees the implementation and enforcement to ensure the regulation supports digital sector growth and compliance across member states.
Healthcare AI agents classified as high-risk (e.g., medical devices using AI) must undergo rigorous assessment, registration, and monitoring to safeguard patient safety and rights. This ensures AI in healthcare complies with stringent EU product safety and ethical standards.
The Act emphasizes human oversight over AI systems to avoid harmful outcomes, ensuring decisions made by or aided by AI are continuously monitored by people, rather than relying solely on automated processes, thereby protecting users’ safety and fundamental rights.