The healthcare system in the United States is changing quickly, particularly in oncology. Initiatives like the Enhancing Oncology Model (EOM) from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and standardized metrics from the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+) highlight the increasing role of patient navigation in cancer care. This article discusses the need for disease-specific, evidence-based metrics for patient navigation and how these metrics can improve care quality and patient experience.
Patient navigation is an important part of cancer care delivery. It helps patients navigate barriers in the healthcare system, providing support from pre-diagnosis through treatment and survivorship. The EOM, which started on July 1, 2023, focuses on value-based, patient-centered care for those receiving chemotherapy. One of its key goals is to enhance care coordination while decreasing Medicare costs.
As navigation programs become more popular, the need for standardized metrics to measure success is apparent. AONN+ has created 35 evidence-based metrics covering areas such as patient experience (PE), clinical outcomes (CO), and return on investment (ROI). These metrics are crucial in showing the effectiveness and sustainability of navigation programs, helping to clarify patient outcomes.
A major issue within patient navigation has been the absence of consistent metrics to gauge program success. Traditionally, many navigation programs have operated independently, making it challenging to compare their effectiveness. Standardized metrics aim to provide a common framework that all navigation programs can use to measure success.
Metrics like distress screening, pathway compliance, and timeliness of care are essential for assessing clinical outcomes. Metrics that measure patient experience, such as involvement in treatment discussions, are also becoming increasingly important. Research shows that when healthcare providers listen to patients and integrate psychosocial goals into treatment plans, patient expectations are often surpassed. The 2013 Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey highlights the crucial role of patient experience in evaluating navigation success.
The 35 evidence-based metrics developed by AONN+ are based on thorough literature reviews and input from various stakeholders. These metrics serve a purpose, providing actionable data that can help improve navigation programs and guide administrators in their resource allocation decisions.
As the value of patient navigation is recognized, healthcare administrators must utilize these standardized metrics to continually assess and enhance their programs.
Though standardized metrics can offer many benefits, several challenges must be addressed for successful implementation.
Patient navigation programs vary significantly in design and focus, leading to inconsistencies in how metrics are applied. As Danelle Johnston, MSN, RN, OCN, ONN-CG points out, there are no uniform navigation programs. Each needs to adjust its metrics to match specific goals and patient populations, complicating assessment comparisons between programs.
Health disparities are a long-standing issue in oncology care, especially for underserved groups. The EOM specifically addresses the needs of lower-income patients and those eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. This attention to health equity underscores the need for disease-specific metrics that factor in social determinants of health alongside clinical aspects.
For navigation programs to make effective use of the standardized metrics from AONN+, it is essential to have strategic data collection and reporting methods. This could require staff training on new metrics, refining current workflows, or investing in technology to aid data capture.
Incorporating these practices into patient navigation can enhance quality and engagement. By creating strong feedback loops, administrators can ensure these metrics result in meaningful changes within their programs.
As healthcare progresses, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation technologies is becoming important. AI can help streamline processes in patient navigation programs, enhancing efficiency and improving the patient experience. For example, AI-driven chatbots can quickly respond to patient questions, assist with scheduling, and send follow-up reminders. This allows care teams to focus on more complex patient interactions while effectively handling routine concerns.
AI algorithms can also aid in data analysis to identify trends and evaluate the effectiveness of different navigation strategies. This information can help administrators discover which approaches benefit patients the most, thus improving care quality.
Workflow automation can significantly support navigation programs. By automating routine tasks like appointment scheduling, data entry, and communication follow-ups, healthcare providers can free up resources and reduce staff burnout.
Implementing automation can greatly enhance patient navigation. It enables a more organized flow of information, ensuring care coordinators can access patient data in real-time and respond quickly to changing situations.
The EOM highlights the importance of constant clinician access and personalized care plans, making automation of these aspects essential. Automated systems can assess patient needs and offer immediate responses, ensuring a quality patient experience.
The patient navigation journey requires various interactions among oncology practices, treatment facilities, and support services. Effective communication is necessary to keep all parties aligned on patient needs and care goals.
Communication tools can help connect patients with their healthcare teams. For example, patient relationship management systems can enhance cooperation in care efforts, keeping everyone informed about patient progress, appointment schedules, and any adjustments to treatment plans.
Administrators can improve these communication channels by including metrics related to communication effectiveness in routine evaluations. This approach can help create a cohesive experience for patients navigating complex oncology treatments.
The commitment to patient-centered care under the EOM emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to provide high-quality oncology services. Patient navigators must work closely with oncologists, social workers, and support services to address patient needs comprehensively.
This integrated approach promotes a holistic understanding of each patient’s situation, ensuring that their clinical and social requirements are met. By creating and applying metrics that assess collaboration among interdisciplinary teams, healthcare organizations can further enhance care quality and outcomes for cancer patients.
As the healthcare system evolves, patient navigation programs must adapt to changing needs. Key areas for future development include:
The future of patient navigation in the United States presents many opportunities, particularly through developing evidence-based, disease-specific metrics that enhance care quality and patient experience. By effectively using standardized metrics, embracing technology, improving communication, and promoting collaboration, healthcare administrators can increase the effectiveness of navigation programs. This, in turn, can improve outcomes for cancer patients and foster meaningful changes within the healthcare system.
The integration of AI and workflow automation supports these efforts, allowing patient navigators to provide efficient, patient-focused care. As we look ahead, patient navigation is set to evolve, leading to better experiences and outcomes for those facing cancer challenges. By utilizing the emerging insights and methods from initiatives like AONN+ and EOM, stakeholders can create a more effective support system that addresses the varied needs of oncology patients across the country.
The key areas are patient experience (PE), clinical outcomes (CO), and business performance or return on investment (ROI) metrics.
The standardized navigation metrics were developed by the Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+) through a collaborative initiative involving content experts and a task force.
Patient navigation programs help overcome healthcare system barriers and facilitate timely access to quality care from pre-diagnosis through all phases of the cancer experience.
The task force developed a total of 35 standardized metrics that focus on patient experience, clinical outcomes, and ROI.
Business performance/ROI is important as administrators seek to demonstrate the sustainability and efficacy of navigation services, particularly in justifying their costs.
Patient experience is increasingly viewed as critical for measuring navigation success, emphasizing how well healthcare providers listen to patients and incorporate their goals into treatment.
Patient navigation was formally introduced in 1990 by Dr. Harold P. Freeman to address care disparities among underserved breast cancer patients.
Metrics were validated through literature reviews, feasibility testing, and rigorous review against specified criteria to ensure reliability and significance.
There was a need because previously, navigation programs lacked a common framework for metrics, making it difficult to compare and assess their effectiveness.
As navigation programs evolve, additional evidence-based disease-specific metrics will need to be developed to complement the standardized navigation metrics.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
