The Colorado AI Act is the first main AI law in the United States focused on high-risk AI systems, especially in healthcare. It became law in May 2024 and will start in February 2026. This law makes healthcare providers and other groups using AI follow strict rules about control, honesty, and fairness.
The Colorado AI Act says “high-risk AI systems” are those that make or heavily affect big decisions. These decisions change access to care, healthcare costs, medical results, and other important things. Examples include AI tools for appointment booking, billing, diagnosing, and treatment choices.
The law wants to stop “algorithmic discrimination.” This happens when AI treats some patients unfairly because of their race, age, disability, language, gender, or veteran status. For example, an AI system that does not work well with patients who speak different languages, or one trained on biased data, can cause unfair results. The law says healthcare groups must check and fix these biases.
Healthcare providers using AI must clearly tell patients when AI helps make decisions about their care or bills. These notices must explain how the AI was involved, let patients ask for a human to review the decision, and offer ways to correct data mistakes. Providers also have to publish yearly reports online that explain how AI is used, what data is involved, and what problems were found and fixed.
The law requires healthcare organizations to set up risk management plans that include:
Many providers will follow standards like the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework and ISO 42001 to meet these rules.
The Colorado Attorney General is the only authority that can enforce this law. Breaking it is treated the same as unfair trade acts and can lead to penalties. Some groups are exempt, such as small healthcare providers with fewer than 50 employees, federally regulated groups, and research projects that do not use high-risk AI.
The Colorado AI Act is one of many new laws and rules about AI in healthcare in the U.S. and other countries.
Other places, like the European Union with its EU AI Act, also sort AI systems by risk. Healthcare AI is marked as “high risk.” These rules require detailed records, strict testing, ongoing checks, and human control.
Healthcare decisions often affect people’s lives. So, regulators want AI to explain how it makes choices. This is called Explainable AI or XAI. It helps patients and providers trust AI because they can see the reasons behind its decisions. It also helps find mistakes or bias so they can be fixed quickly.
Laws like Colorado’s give patients the right to understand AI decisions, disagree with unfair ones, and ask for a human review. These rights help keep patients in control and improve trust in AI healthcare.
AI laws work together with data protection laws like HIPAA in the U.S. and GDPR in Europe. AI systems handling health data must keep personal information safe from theft or misuse. Privacy rules must be followed at every step.
Automated AI systems, especially those affecting care or costs, must have humans watching over them. This is called “human-in-the-loop.” It helps prevent errors and unfair results. It also keeps patient safety and ethics in mind.
Regular checks for bias stop AI from treating certain patient groups unfairly. The Future of Privacy Forum expects that ongoing bias monitoring and fixing will become normal for healthcare using AI.
Healthcare leaders and managers need to act now to get ready for these new rules.
Providers should review all AI systems they use. This includes front-desk tasks like scheduling and billing, plus clinical decision support tools. The review should check for bias, privacy compliance, clear explanations, and honesty.
Healthcare groups should create formal AI governance plans using known frameworks like NIST AI Risk Management Framework and ISO 42001. These plans need to set roles for monitoring AI, assessing risks, keeping records, and handling problems.
It is important for leaders, IT teams, doctors, and front-office staff to understand AI rules and risks. Regular training about AI governance, rules, and how to communicate with patients about AI should be standard.
Healthcare providers need to make patient-friendly documents that explain how AI is used. This includes notice templates, reports, and privacy information. These help follow transparency laws and build trust with patients.
Because AI laws like the Colorado AI Act are new and complex, providers should work with legal and compliance experts in healthcare AI. These experts can help with setup, audits, and any government investigations.
AI in healthcare does more than help with medical decisions. It also changes administrative work. Automating repeated front-office tasks can save time, cut mistakes, and improve patient experiences. But AI governance is important when AI handles these tasks.
Simbo AI is a company that uses AI for phone automation and answering services in front offices. Their systems use natural language processing and smart call routing to schedule appointments, answer patient questions, and send routine messages with little human help.
This automation lowers wait times and frees staff for harder tasks. But since phone automation affects how patients get care, it is considered high-risk under laws like the Colorado AI Act. Providers must make sure the AI works well for all patients, including those who speak different languages or have disabilities, to avoid unfair treatment.
AI tools that handle appointment booking and billing can make practices more efficient. Auto-schedulers stop double bookings and no-shows, while AI-assisted billing lowers errors and speeds claim processing. But providers must control AI bias because if AI favors some patients over others, it could unfairly block access or cause higher costs, which breaks fairness rules.
Many AI tools link with EHR systems to help doctors and staff in real time. This makes workflows smoother but needs careful data rules to keep privacy, security, and legal compliance.
Even with automation, human oversight is very important. Healthcare managers must set up steps where staff check AI decisions that affect patient care or billing problems. This matches new rules calling for humans in the loop to keep accountability.
AI in healthcare has many good uses but needs careful control, especially as laws like the Colorado AI Act start. Hospitals, clinics, and group practices should start now by reviewing AI tools, using known governance frameworks, teaching staff, and being clear with patients.
Stopping algorithmic discrimination, protecting data privacy, and making AI decisions clear will be key for following rules. AI tools in front office operations, like phone answering and scheduling offered by companies such as Simbo AI, must be handled with care.
Healthcare leaders and IT managers should guide their organizations for responsible AI use. This allows them to benefit from AI while following the law and protecting patients.
By keeping up with laws and using good governance, healthcare groups can handle AI rules and prepare for the future in digital healthcare.
The Colorado AI Act aims to regulate high-risk AI systems in healthcare by imposing governance and disclosure requirements to mitigate algorithmic discrimination and ensure fairness in decision-making processes.
The Act applies broadly to AI systems used in healthcare, particularly those that make consequential decisions regarding care, access, or costs.
Algorithmic discrimination occurs when AI-driven decisions result in unfair treatment of individuals based on traits like race, age, or disability.
Providers should develop risk management frameworks, evaluate their AI usage, and stay updated on regulations as they evolve.
Developers must disclose information on training data, document efforts to minimize biases, and conduct impact assessments before deployment.
Deployers must mitigate algorithmic discrimination risks, implement risk management policies, and conduct regular impact assessments of high-risk AI systems.
Healthcare providers will need to assess their AI applications in billing, scheduling, and clinical decision-making to ensure they comply with anti-discrimination measures.
Deployers must inform patients of AI system use before making consequential decisions and must explain the role of AI in adverse outcomes.
The Colorado Attorney General has the authority to enforce the Act, with no private right of action for consumers to sue under it.
Providers should audit existing AI systems, train staff on compliance, implement governance frameworks, and prepare for evolving regulatory landscapes.