Claim denials happen when health insurers refuse to pay medical service claims. Denied claims cause revenue losses and add work for healthcare providers. Data shows that denial rates usually range between 5% and 10%, with some over 15%. These denials slow down payments and increase costs, costing providers time and money.
A 2017 study by Change Healthcare found that each denied claim costs about $117 because of follow-up, rework, and appeals. About 65% of denied claims are never sent again, so payments are lost. Also, nearly 60% of claims that are resubmitted get denied again. This shows problems in the claims process.
For example, a healthcare group sending 20,000 claims each month with a 20% denial rate could have 4,000 denied claims causing about $300,000 in losses monthly. Cutting the denial rate to 10% could save $150,000 every month. This shows how important good denial management is for finances.
Tracking KPIs gives healthcare groups ways to check how well their revenue processes work and to make them better. Since denial management affects money coming in, watching these numbers helps medical practices improve cash flow and work efficiency.
Below are key KPIs used in U.S. healthcare to manage revenue cycles:
This shows the percentage of claims denied the first time they are sent. It’s found by dividing the dollar amount of denied claims by the total dollar amount submitted.
Studies say about 90% of denials can be avoided. They often come from errors in eligibility, documents, or codes. Lowering this rate improves cash flow and lessens extra work by cutting rework and appeals.
This tracks the percentage of claims sent without mistakes and paid on the first try, with no need for fixes or resubmission.
A clean claim rate doesn’t always mean no denials. Payer rules or authorization issues can still cause denials. But keeping rates high is key for faster reimbursement and less extra work.
This is the average number of days it takes to collect payment after services are given.
Good A/R management supports steady cash and helps avoid late payments and bad debt. Data shows it’s important to keep over 90-day A/R below 10%.
This measures the percent of denied claims that get appealed and paid within a set time.
Some reports show that using AI tools helped reduce resolution times from 45 days to 20, which improved payments.
This ratio shows the share of revenue lost because of uncollected accounts written off as bad debt.
Collecting payments from patients matters more now because of higher deductibles. Practices usually get 60% to 80% of what patients owe. Better financial advice can lower denials from unpaid patient bills.
This shows the percentage of expected payments received after adjustments and write-offs.
This shows how completely and quickly billable charges are recorded after service.
This measures the percentage of patient payments collected when they get service.
Common reasons claims get denied in U.S. healthcare include:
New payer rules and complex billing have made denials rise by about 20% in five years, partly due to challenges from COVID-19. Healthcare groups need to manage denials closely to deal with these common causes.
Training staff is important to cut denial rates. Ongoing learning about coding rules, payer policies, and documentation helps staff send accurate claims.
Groups that invest in training usually have fewer denials and better first-pass resolution rates. For example, some cardiology practices reach up to 92% first-pass rates by focusing on coding accuracy and sending claims within a week after service.
Some practical process improvements include:
Using artificial intelligence (AI) and workflow automation is changing how healthcare handles revenue and denials.
AI tools check claims before sending to find errors or missing information that could cause denials. This is called claim scrubbing. It spots risky claims early so staff can correct mistakes first. Research shows using AI tools cuts initial denial rates by finding common problems like eligibility errors.
Systems like Simbo AI’s SimboConnect use AI phone agents to automate checking claim status and denial questions. This lowers manual work and speeds up payment recovery.
Manual denial tracking is hard and can miss deadlines or follow-ups. Automation helps by:
For example, a community hospital using AI to rank denials cut their resolution time from 45 days to 20 days, improving cash flow and lowering write-offs.
Some revenue cycle platforms link electronic health records (EHR), billing systems, and analytics to give managers instant info on claims and denials. These digital workflows speed up decisions and help use resources wisely.
Systems like DocBox link patient data with clinical and admin work. This lowers billing mistakes and improves charge capture. Dr. Yatin Mehta from Medanta Hospital says such tools improve finances in critical care by connecting clinical docs to billing.
AI and automation lower admin work, increase accuracy, and speed up revenue cycles. Providers using these get:
Regular KPI reports are needed to keep revenue health strong. Healthcare leaders should use dashboards that track denial rates, A/R days, resolution times, and collection rates to:
Outsourced billing services suggest monthly reports that are clear, accurate, and useful. This supports steady performance checks and smarter decisions.
For healthcare administrators, practice owners, and IT managers in the U.S., knowing and managing KPIs about claim submission and denial resolution is key for financial health. Focusing on important numbers like initial denial rates, clean claim rates, and denial resolution speed helps find problems and fix them to improve cash flow and stop revenue loss.
New tools like AI and automation will keep reducing denials and improving workflows. Watching these metrics regularly and investing in staff training and technology will help healthcare groups handle payer changes and keep steady revenue cycles.
Denial management involves analyzing and addressing claims that payers have rejected. It is essential for preserving revenue and operational efficiency as denied claims can hinder cash flow and potentially reduce a provider’s net patient revenue by 5%. Effective strategies are critical for maintaining financial health.
The initial denial rate is the percentage of claims denied upon first submission. It is calculated by dividing the total dollar amount of denied claims by the total dollar amount of claims submitted. A target benchmark is less than 5%.
The clean claims rate measures the efficiency of claim submissions by indicating the percentage of claims that are submitted without errors and paid on the first attempt, with a target benchmark of 98%.
A/R days indicate how quickly a provider collects payment for services rendered and is calculated by dividing total accounts receivable by average daily revenue. Optimal A/R days should range from 30 to 40.
The denial resolution rate assesses how effectively denial management efforts succeed, showing the percentage of denied claims that are successfully appealed and recovered. The goal is to resolve 85% of denied claims within 30 days.
The bad debt ratio is calculated by dividing total bad debt by total service revenue. It reflects the effectiveness of a practice’s collection processes, with an ideal target of less than 5%.
The net adjusted collection rate measures the percentage of expected collections that a healthcare practice actually collects, taking into account adjustments and write-offs. A target benchmark is between 97% and 99%.
Charge capture rate measures how effectively a practice records billable services immediately after they are performed. Best practices suggest capturing all charges within 3 to 5 days, with late charges being less than 2%.
POS collections measure the amount of patient payment collected at the time of service, with a target of collecting 100% of the expected monthly average net revenue at this point.
Technology, particularly automation and AI, enhances denial management by reducing administrative burdens, identifying and mitigating denials, streamlining workflows, and improving revenue recovery, resulting in more efficient processes.