AI tools are being used more to help with medical paperwork. One example is the “DAX Copilot,” a technology started by Atrium Health in Charlotte, North Carolina. Over 1,500 doctors there use this AI tool to record patient visits with smartphones or other devices. Then, the AI writes clinical summaries, which cuts down the time doctors spend typing notes after visits.
Pediatrician Jocelyn Wilson said that before using DAX Copilot, she spent a lot of time typing notes, which took her attention away from patients. Now, the AI saves her more than an hour each day and helps her focus more during appointments. This is important because a 2020 Mayo Clinic study found that doctors spend one to two hours after work doing paperwork. Many doctors say this leads to burnout.
Almost half (47%) of Atrium Health doctors using DAX Copilot said they spent less time working on notes at home. This shows that AI can help doctors be more efficient and spend more time with patients. For medical managers and IT staff, these tools can also reduce costs and make staff happier.
Although AI has clear benefits, many patients worry about how their private health information is kept safe when AI collects and processes data. A national survey found that about 70% of patients feel okay with AI helping during appointments, but the same percentage are still worried about data privacy and security.
In the US, health data privacy is mostly protected by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA covers identifiable medical information. However, AI often works with data that has had identifying information removed, which HIPAA does not always control. Some studies show that AI’s strong pattern-spotting can accidentally reveal or “reidentify” anonymous patient information.
Law professor W. Nicholson Price II explained that AI can sometimes link unrelated data points, like shopping habits or demographic info, to guess private health details that patients did not directly share.
Also, privacy rules have made it harder to gather the big and varied datasets needed to teach AI. The strict rules and consent forms increase costs and efforts for data collection. As a result, many datasets come mostly from well-funded, city hospitals instead of smaller or rural clinics.
This creates bias. AI models may not work well for patients from groups or areas that are not well represented in the data. For example, IBM’s Watson for Oncology AI system performed poorly because it learned mainly from one urban cancer center. This shows how limited data sharing can hurt some patient groups and reduce the trustworthiness of AI tools.
Problems go beyond privacy. Research shows that many voice recognition and AI note-taking tools make more mistakes with some patient groups. Errors are higher for racial minorities and people who do not speak English as their first language. For instance, errors for Black speakers have been found to be twice as common as for white speakers.
This raises questions about fairness and safety. Incorrect records can cause wrong treatment decisions and harm patients.
There is also historic mistrust of healthcare institutions among some communities because of past unfair treatment. These groups may be less willing to share personal health information or agree to AI documentation. This leads to even less diverse data for AI, making the bias problem worse.
The healthcare field is trying new ways to keep patient data safe while allowing AI to work. Two important methods are Federated Learning and Hybrid Techniques.
Despite progress, these methods can be hard to set up and might lower AI performance or take longer to train. Researchers are trying to find the right balance between data safety and useful AI in real clinics.
AI is also used to help with front-office tasks like phone systems. Managing patient calls is important for appointments, reminders, and questions, all of which affect patient satisfaction and how well the office runs.
Companies like Simbo AI offer phone systems powered by AI for healthcare offices. These AI systems can answer calls automatically, handle simple requests, confirm appointments, and send urgent messages to staff. This lowers the workload for front desk workers and shortens patient wait times on the phone.
These phone systems work well with electronic health records (EHR) and practice management software. They update patient info in real time, check appointments, and send reminders. This automates tasks that were once done by hand and reduces human mistakes.
Using AI in these ways helps practices run smoother and costs less by reducing staffing needs and missed calls. In busy offices, AI phone systems are becoming necessary to keep things organized.
Even though AI can help a lot with notes and office work, experts say human review is still very important. Allison Koenecke, a professor at Cornell University, says humans need to be involved to check AI results. Doctors should look at AI-created medical records before signing them to make sure nothing important is missed or misunderstood.
This human check is key because AI can have trouble with different speech styles or understanding the context. It also helps make sure patients get care that fits their needs.
Healthcare managers need to set up AI tools to support doctors, not replace their judgment. Training staff and organizing workflows well can find a good balance between saving time and keeping accuracy.
The US has special challenges and chances for using AI in healthcare. Privacy laws like HIPAA are strict, protecting patient data tightly. These rules, while needed, make it harder to use AI widely.
Data sharing also varies by place. City hospitals join AI studies more often and share more data than rural or community hospitals. This difference causes geographic bias and affects how well AI works everywhere. For managers in less urban areas, AI tools may need changes to work well.
Changing privacy rules or finding safe ways to share more data will help AI reach more patients. Some experts suggest asking patients to allow their anonymous or even identifiable data to be used for research, balancing privacy with progress.
Medical leaders and IT managers will find that AI, like AI-created notes and automated phone systems, offers both benefits and responsibilities. AI can help reduce doctor burnout, make workflows smoother, and improve patient care, as shown by Atrium Health’s DAX Copilot.
But patients still worry about data privacy, especially because of risks like data reidentification and uneven AI accuracy among groups. Privacy issues must be taken seriously. Strong protections, new privacy methods, and human review are all needed to use AI well and fairly.
Healthcare providers should carefully choose AI tools that meet privacy rules, train staff properly, and watch AI outputs closely. Also, talking openly with patients about how their data is used and kept safe can build trust and make them more open to AI.
As AI use grows in US healthcare, medical administrators, clinic owners, and IT managers must guide how technologies are adopted. This will help respect patient concerns while making care better.
AI is helping healthcare providers, like Atrium Health, use virtual scribes to record patient visits, allowing doctors to focus more on patients and less on paperwork.
DAX Copilot records conversations during patient visits, turning them into clinical summaries for the doctor to review, which saves considerable time in documentation.
AI tools can drastically reduce the time spent on documentation, allowing physicians more time for patient care and reducing stress associated with unfinished notes.
AI technologies may struggle with voice recognition accuracy for minority groups and can misinterpret information, leading to potential inaccuracies in patient records.
Despite generally positive attitudes towards AI, patients remain concerned about data privacy and the accuracy of AI-generated medical records.
By minimizing documentation burdens, DAX Copilot allows physicians to manage their time more effectively and reduces the stress associated with extensive paperwork.
Research shows variability in the success of AI-generated notes, with significant error rates reported, particularly among diverse patient populations.
Healthcare systems like Atrium Health ensure AI tool security through biometry and password protection, with recordings deleted once the associated notes are approved.
Although AI increases efficiency, there are concerns it might detract from personal interactions between doctors and patients if used excessively.
The future involves balancing AI implementation with human oversight to ensure quality patient care, while addressing the technology’s limitations and ethical concerns.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
