Healthcare organizations in the United States face ongoing challenges in managing revenue cycles efficiently. One of the major difficulties is dealing with insurance claim denials, which affect cash flow, increase administrative workloads, and ultimately impact the financial stability of medical practices and hospitals. These denials can result from a range of issues such as coding errors, missing prior authorizations, patient eligibility mistakes, and lack of sufficient documentation. To address these problems, many healthcare providers are turning to artificial intelligence (AI) and automation as key tools in proactive denial management. By handling issues before claims are submitted, AI reduces denials, minimizes manual work, and enhances revenue cycle management (RCM).
This article discusses how proactive denial management works with AI in healthcare, the financial benefits it can bring, and the important role of automation in refining RCM workflows. The content is especially useful for medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers responsible for optimizing healthcare operations across the United States.
Claim denials in U.S. healthcare have increased over recent years, affecting many types of medical practices ranging from community health centers to large hospital systems. According to recent data, initial claim denial rates rose to 11.8% in 2024 from about 10.2% a few years prior. Commercial insurance denials grew by 1.5%, and Medicare Advantage plans saw a 4.8% increase in denial rates between 2023 and 2024. These rising rates of claim denials create financial pressure as denials require additional staff time for rework, appeals, and follow-ups.
Denials are costly: the administrative cost to correct and resubmit a rejected claim averages between $25 and $181. Annually, the healthcare industry faces billions of dollars in denial-related expenses, with rejection rates accounting for close to 20% of all medical billing requests. Many denials occur due to avoidable errors such as patient registration mistakes, coding inaccuracies, and missing prior authorizations. For instance, about 25% of refusals in primary care settings stem from coding errors alone.
Poor handling of denials also impacts reimbursement timelines, affecting not just revenue but staff morale as time spent on denials could be directed toward quality patient care instead. Therefore, reducing denial rates has become a major goal for healthcare organizations aiming to maintain financial health and operational efficiency.
Proactive denial management means preventing denials before they happen, rather than reacting after a claim has been rejected. This approach involves verifying patient eligibility before appointments, ensuring prior authorizations are obtained, performing detailed claim scrubbing to detect errors, and maintaining accurate clinical documentation.
With proactive denial management, healthcare organizations take a forward-looking approach by analyzing patterns that typically cause denials, fixing issues upfront, and streamlining claim submission processes. This shifts the focus from costly appeals and rework to prevention, creating smoother revenue cycles and faster reimbursements.
AI technologies have become crucial in supporting proactive denial management. By leveraging AI for analytics, pattern recognition, and automation, organizations can detect errors early, flag high-risk claims, and reduce manual work, all of which lessen the administrative burden and improve financial outcomes.
Artificial intelligence plays a multi-faceted role in preventing and managing denials before they affect the revenue cycle. Some of the main applications of AI in this space include:
AI systems analyze historical claims data, payer rules, and denial patterns to predict which claims are most likely to be denied. By identifying these risks before submission, healthcare providers can intervene to correct errors, improve documentation, or verify eligibility. This predictive capability can reduce denial rates by at least 10% within the first six months of AI implementation, as reported by Black Book Research.
AI tools automate patient eligibility checks, confirming insurance coverage in real time. They also assist with prior authorization requests by submitting documentation and monitoring approvals, minimizing delays and denials related to missing authorizations. Providence Health notably saved $30 million annually by automating insurance verification processes.
Before claims are submitted, AI-powered claim scrubbing reviews each claim for errors, missing data, and compliance inconsistencies. This real-time checking has been shown to increase first-pass acceptance rates and achieve clean claim rates of up to 99.9%. Companies like ENTER have developed platforms that combine proprietary AI scrubbers with industry-standard edits to validate claims against payer rules continuously. These systems learn and adapt to changing regulations, ensuring ongoing compliance and reducing manual rework.
AI tracks denial trends and recognizes common reasons for claim rejections. It then automates appeals generation for denials likely to succeed or recommends alternative corrective actions. Banner Health, for example, uses AI bots to generate appeal letters based on denial codes, which speeds up the appeals process and improves cash flow.
Some AI solutions analyze patient financial data to offer tailored payment plans and automate billing communication via messaging or phone agents. SimboConnect’s AI Phone Agent, for instance, confirms unpaid bills via SMS and offers payment links, helping to accelerate collections without increasing staff workload.
Automation integrates closely with AI to create efficient workflows in healthcare revenue cycle management. Workflow automation reduces repetitive manual tasks, enabling staff to focus on resolving complex claims and improving patient care.
Key automation practices include:
Workflow automation paired with AI reduces administrative costs by up to 30%, as found with ENTER’s clients, who report savings from minimized manual effort and improved accuracy in claims processing. The Fresno Community Health Care Network experienced a 22% decrease in prior-authorization denials by leveraging automated claims review AI tools. At the same time, they saved 30 to 35 staff hours weekly without increasing RCM personnel, emphasizing how automation helps manage growing workloads while controlling costs.
Healthcare providers who use AI in denial management report significant financial improvements. Auburn Community Hospital in New York experienced a 50% reduction in discharged-but-not-final-billed cases alongside a 40% increase in coder productivity after AI and robotic process automation implementation. This improvement led to a better case mix index as well, indicating higher quality documentation and billing accuracy.
Likewise, organizations that integrate AI-driven denial management platforms see:
Additionally, AI platforms’ real-time updates ensure compliance with evolving payer policies, prevent costly denials, and minimize audit risks.
Despite the clear benefits, healthcare organizations must consider challenges when implementing AI-based denial management systems:
Addressing these factors is essential for successful AI integration and achieving desired outcomes in denial management.
For medical practice administrators and owners, AI-driven proactive denial management can lead to more predictable revenue flows and reduced financial uncertainty. By decreasing rejected claims and speeding up collections, practices free up resources that can be reinvested in patient care or technology upgrades.
IT managers benefit from implementing AI platforms that integrate well with existing systems, reducing manual data handling and improving claims accuracy. AI can also enhance security by detecting fraudulent patterns and ensuring claims comply with changing payer and regulatory requirements.
Healthcare providers in the U.S., where payer complexity is notably high, particularly appreciate that AI tools continuously update to reflect new rules, payer policies, and legislation like the No Surprises Act. These adjustments help navigate the rapidly changing reimbursement environment without constant manual reprogramming.
The use of AI and automation in proactive denial management is increasingly becoming a standard practice among U.S. healthcare organizations looking to improve financial performance and reduce administrative burden. By identifying and resolving claim issues before submission, AI minimizes denials, expedites reimbursements, and optimizes resource allocation.
As rejection rates continue to rise and payer requirements grow more complex, healthcare providers that do not adopt proactive denial management strategies risk losing revenue and facing higher operational costs. Medical practice administrators, owners, and IT managers should carefully evaluate AI technologies and workflow automation as key components of a sustainable revenue cycle management strategy in today’s healthcare environment.
Approximately 46% of hospitals and health systems currently use AI in their revenue-cycle management operations.
AI helps streamline tasks in revenue-cycle management, reducing administrative burdens and expenses while enhancing efficiency and productivity.
Generative AI can analyze extensive documentation to identify missing information or potential mistakes, optimizing processes like coding.
AI-driven natural language processing systems automatically assign billing codes from clinical documentation, reducing manual effort and errors.
AI predicts likely denials and their causes, allowing healthcare organizations to resolve issues proactively before they become problematic.
Call centers in healthcare have reported a productivity increase of 15% to 30% through the implementation of generative AI.
Yes, AI can create personalized payment plans based on individual patients’ financial situations, optimizing their payment processes.
AI enhances data security by detecting and preventing fraudulent activities, ensuring compliance with coding standards and guidelines.
Auburn Community Hospital reported a 50% reduction in discharged-not-final-billed cases and over a 40% increase in coder productivity after implementing AI.
Generative AI faces challenges like bias mitigation, validation of outputs, and the need for guardrails in data structuring to prevent inequitable impacts on different populations.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
