Health differences are still a big problem in American medicine. Often, the words used in hospitals and clinics do not match the many kinds of patients and their situations. Some usual terms can make patients feel worse or left out. For example, calling a patient with sickle cell disease a “sickler” can change how doctors see them. Dr. Malika Fair, an emergency doctor, says that such labels can make doctors treat patients unfairly or give lower quality care.
Dr. Fair says it is better to use language that focuses on fairness and respects patients as people. This way, doctors see patients as whole individuals, not just their sickness or life situations. Language can change how doctors make decisions and how patients get involved in their care. When patients feel respected and understood, they trust their doctors more. AMA President Gerald E. Harmon says trust is very important in the patient and doctor relationship.
One big change in healthcare language is moving from saying “cultural competence” to “cultural humility.” “Cultural competence” means knowing a patient’s culture well enough, but it can cause doctors to make wrong guesses or use stereotypes. On the other hand, “cultural humility” means learning all the time. Doctors are asked to think about their own beliefs and listen carefully to patients without judging them first.
This ongoing learning helps doctors better meet the needs of different patients. It means no training or checklist can cover everything about culture. For hospital managers and owners, teaching cultural humility to staff can help improve communication and lower health problems caused by misunderstandings or hidden biases.
The AMA and AAMC guide suggests swapping hurtful or old-fashioned words with ones that respect patients’ lives and social settings. Some changes include:
Hospital managers should think about updating patient forms, electronic health records, and teaching materials to use this fair language. This helps patients feel respected and might make care better.
Dr. Malika Fair shows how bad language can hurt patient care. Using labels that make patients feel less than human can change how doctors act. This can lead to worse care and keep stigma alive. For example, if patients hear mean names, they might feel unwelcome or not trust doctors. This can cause delays in getting care or not following doctor’s advice.
Language in notes and team talks also matters. Words that are negative or ignore patients can become normal in hospital culture. This can affect how teams judge and treat patients. Being aware of fair language helps fight hidden biases and lowers unfair care differences.
Changing language means learning all the time. Hospitals in the U.S. must keep training staff and work on improving quality. This is like teaching hand-washing or medicine safety again and again. Repeating these lessons helps make new behavior normal.
Managers and IT staff should help put fair language into daily work by:
Training teams like this can improve talking skills and help patients, especially those who were left out in the past.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation tools now help medical offices talk to patients and work better. Some companies, like Simbo AI, use AI to handle phone calls and answering services. This helps health equity and respectful language use.
In busy offices, front desk talk shapes patients’ first feelings about their care. AI answering services can do many tasks like making appointments, sending reminders, and answering common questions using polite and patient-centered words. AI offers consistent respectful words compared to rushed or mixed human responses.
Simbo AI’s system helps managers and IT staff by:
Also, AI systems can be updated as healthcare language changes. This supports cultural humility as a habit across the office. When teams and AI tools always use inclusive language, patients often feel respected even before clinic visits.
Medical leaders in the U.S. can work with AI providers like Simbo AI to make workflows better and keep patient dignity in all communication. These tools can fix workflow issues without lowering respect between patients and staff.
For hospital managers, owners, and IT leaders who want to change healthcare words and support patient respect, here are some steps:
By focusing on respectful, fair language and using tools like workflow automation, medical offices can help lower care differences and improve patient relationships.
This way of using language shows a commitment to treating each patient with respect. It understands history and social situations that affect health. It also uses technology well to support these goals. As health fairness becomes more important in U.S. care, the words chosen by doctors and systems will help build places where all patients feel valued and respected.
Using dehumanizing terms changes how providers perceive and treat patients, potentially leading to biased care and worsened outcomes. Such language fosters stigma and marginalization rather than empathy, affecting patient trust and quality of care.
Equity-focused language promotes patient-centered, respectful communication that avoids labeling, objectification, and stigma. It supports deeper understanding and trust, crucial for effective counseling and addressing health disparities.
‘Cultural humility’ frames cultural understanding as an ongoing, evolving process rather than a fixed skill set implied by ‘cultural competence.’ It encourages continuous self-reflection and adaptation to diverse patient needs rather than assuming mastery.
The guide suggests using phrases like ‘historically and intentionally excluded’ or ‘disinvested’ to acknowledge systemic causes of disparities, rather than blaming communities or individuals with pejorative terms like ‘under-resourced.’
Using person-first language such as ‘formerly incarcerated’ acknowledges a person’s history without defining them by it. It reduces stigma and supports dignity, shifting perspective from labels to individual identity and circumstances.
The recommended term is ‘undocumented immigrants’ instead of ‘illegal immigrants’ to avoid criminalizing language. This acknowledges structural barriers immigrants face without dehumanizing or stigmatizing them.
Using community-preferred terms such as ‘Native Peoples,’ ‘Indigenous Peoples,’ or specific tribal names is advised, respecting self-identification and cultural sovereignty over outdated or generalized terms like ‘Indians.’
‘Historically marginalized’ highlights systemic exclusion and power dynamics more accurately than ‘minority,’ which may imply numeric inferiority. It stresses historical contexts of marginalization in race, ethnicity, and gender identities.
‘Nonadherence’ is preferred as it avoids placing blame solely on patients. It recognizes structural, financial, and social barriers that affect patients’ ability to follow treatment recommendations.
The guide emphasizes this as a continuous journey, not a fixed goal, akin to quality improvement initiatives like hand hygiene. It encourages ongoing education, reflection, and norm changes to foster equity and cultural humility in healthcare communication.