AI disclosure laws are becoming important rules, especially for healthcare groups that use AI tools to help patients and run front office tasks. States like Utah, California, and Colorado have passed laws saying businesses must tell customers when AI systems, especially generative AI, are being used. Starting May 1, 2024, Utah’s Artificial Intelligence Policy Act (UAIPA) requires businesses in regulated areas, including healthcare, to clearly say when generative AI is used at the start of an interaction. California’s AI Transparency Act (SB 942), beginning January 1, 2026, applies to AI providers with over one million monthly users. It needs clear or implied notices about AI use and should offer free AI content detection tools. Colorado’s AI Act (SB 24-205) also covers healthcare AI decisions to stop discrimination by algorithms. It includes disclosure rules starting in February 2026.
Other states, such as Alabama, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, and Massachusetts, have introduced bills that would make it illegal to hide AI use during business deals. These laws try to stop AI from tricking consumers about whether they are talking to a person or a machine.
In this setting, healthcare administrators need to know the rules of their own state. They also need to get ready for possible future federal or multi-state rules that could standardize these disclosure laws. For example, the paused AI Disclosure Act of 2023 suggested national rules for disclaimers on AI outputs. This shows lawmakers at the national level are interested in this topic.
Healthcare administrators should create teams with compliance officers, lawyers, IT experts, clinical staff, and patient representatives. This mix brings together legal, technical, medical, and ethical views for AI rules. Working together helps make policies clear, follow laws, and keep patients safe and private.
Because AI disclosure laws vary, strict policies can be hard to keep. Organizations should make disclosure rules that can change to match state and federal laws. For example:
Flexible policies let organizations add new rules without big problems.
Healthcare administrators must watch AI-related laws carefully. This includes bills in many states and federal proposals. Using monitoring tools and legal advice helps organizations update policies fast and avoid breaking rules.
Joining AI governance with existing data privacy and security helps overall compliance. For example, adding AI risk checks, transparency rules, and human reviews into privacy work helps meet both HIPAA and AI laws. Good data management from collecting to deleting data keeps data safe and lowers AI decision risks.
Legal experts say this approach makes organizations more able to follow global rules and protect healthcare data from breaches and misuse.
Regular checks should look at AI tools for:
These checks help find problems and improve policies.
Training healthcare staff on how AI works and the rules about telling patients is important. Employees need to know how AI fits in daily work and when to tell patients about AI use. More knowledge helps use AI ethically and avoid breaking rules.
Healthcare providers often buy AI tools from other companies. Contracts should include AI rules like needing transparency, data protection, audit options, and following laws. This makes sure vendors meet the healthcare group’s legal and ethical standards during the AI system’s use.
One common use of AI governance is in automating front-office jobs like phone answering, scheduling, patient questions, and first checks. Companies like Simbo AI focus on AI phone automation for healthcare practices. These systems use generative AI to talk with patients in natural language and help by freeing staff from repetitive work.
Still, using AI automation needs careful rules to follow disclosure laws. Healthcare administrators should:
AI automation can cut wait times and help patients reach care. But benefits must go with rule-following and clear communication, so strong AI governance is needed.
Healthcare providers in the U.S. can also gain by linking AI governance to well-known international AI risk management standards. These sets of rules help guide practical use and form future laws. Important frameworks include:
In healthcare, using these frameworks helps manage AI risks well and prepare for future laws. Groups like the Coalition for Health AI work with The Joint Commission to make certification processes connected to Medicare accreditation. This shows growing moves toward required AI governance.
Healthcare groups serving patients in many states need to align their AI governance rules to fit different laws while keeping operations smooth. Ways to do this include:
This helps healthcare groups keep patient trust and avoid fines even when federal AI rules might pause state enforcement for years, like the suggested 2025 House budget deal.
As generative AI gets more human-like and common in healthcare front office jobs, clearly telling about AI use is now a legal and ethical must. Healthcare administrators who build flexible AI governance programs with open disclosure policies, constant law watching, mixed expert teams, and links to privacy and security work will keep following rules and patient trust. They will also get benefits from AI workflow tools like those by Simbo AI, gaining better work results without legal or ethical issues.
By combining careful governance and new technology, healthcare providers in the U.S. can handle changing AI laws and provide better, trustworthy patient care.
The UAIPA, effective May 1, 2024, requires businesses using generative AI to disclose AI interactions. Licensed professionals must prominently disclose AI use at conversation start, while other businesses must clearly disclose AI use when directly asked by consumers. Its scope covers generative AI systems interacting via text, audio, or visuals with limited human oversight.
California’s 2019 Bot Disclosure Law mandates disclosure when internet chatbots are used to knowingly deceive in commercial or electoral contexts. Unlike newer laws focused on generative AI broadly, it applies only to chatbots online and not across all media, emphasizing transparency to prevent deception.
Effective January 1, 2026, this law applies to AI providers with over 1 million California users, requiring free, public AI content detection tools and options for both hidden and explicit AI content disclosures. Violations incur $5,000 fines per incident, targeting transparency in generative AI content.
Enforced from February 1, 2026, the CAIA focuses on preventing algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions like healthcare and employment but also considers AI disclosure requirements to protect consumers interacting with AI in sensitive contexts.
These proposed laws generally classify failure to clearly and conspicuously notify consumers that they are interacting with AI as unfair or deceptive trade practices, especially when AI mimics human behavior without disclosure in commercial transactions.
The AI Disclosure Act of 2023 (H.R. 3831) proposes mandatory disclaimers on AI-generated outputs, enforced by the FTC as deceptive practices violations. However, it has stalled in committee and is currently considered dead.
A 2025 House Republican budget reconciliation bill could prohibit states from enforcing AI regulation for ten years, effectively halting existing laws and pending legislation, raising concerns about public risk and debates over centralized versus fragmented oversight.
Businesses face complex regulatory compliance requirements varying by state. Proactively implementing transparent AI disclosure fosters compliance, consumer trust, and positions companies for evolving legislation, avoiding deceptive practices and related penalties.
Businesses should develop adaptable AI governance programs incorporating disclosure mechanisms, notify consumers of AI use regardless of mandates, monitor evolving legislation, and prepare for potential uniform federal standards to maintain compliance and trust.
As AI interfaces become more human-like, disclosures ensure consumers know they’re interacting with machines, preventing deception, protecting consumer rights, and supporting ethical AI deployment amid growing societal reliance on AI-driven services.
Simbo is using AI agents to automate all phone related workflows. Connect now to know more.
Schedule AI Agents Demo Now© Since 2019, Simbo AI.
