The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including AI-driven virtual agents (VAs) and virtual reality (VR), is changing how medical services are given in the United States. These tools help by giving more patients access to care, especially those living far away or in areas that lack services. They also support patients in following their treatments and create new ways to offer therapy. But these technologies bring challenges related to ethics, laws, and society that affect healthcare workers’ roles and duties. For medical practice managers, owners, and IT staff, it is important to train healthcare workers to use these tools responsibly and effectively. This article explains ways to train healthcare professionals so they can properly and responsibly use AI virtual agents and VR in clinical settings.
Virtual agents are computer programs that use AI to talk like humans. In healthcare, they help patients by answering questions, reminding them to take medicine, or giving health advice. VR makes 3D environments that help with treatments like rehab or exposure therapy.
The COVID-19 pandemic made telehealth and virtual care more common. This made AI tools important to lower infection risks while keeping care going. But research by Catharina Rudschies, Ingrid Schneider, and others shows worries about how these tools change doctor-patient relationships, privacy, safety, and fairness in health care. When AI agents take over tasks done by humans before, healthcare workers need new skills. They must learn how to use these technologies and understand the ethical and legal issues that come with them.
Before making training programs, it is important to know the main ethical and legal problems healthcare workers face with AI virtual agents and VR.
To prepare healthcare workers for these issues, training should include these parts:
Healthcare workers need basic knowledge about how AI virtual agents and VR work. They should learn about AI’s role, features, limits, and how to use interfaces. Training should have hands-on practice and simulations for solving problems to build confidence with the tech.
Training must teach ethics focused on privacy, openness, patient choice, and respect. Staff should learn how to spot ethical problems from using AI and apply ethical decision-making in virtual care.
Clinicians and staff should know healthcare laws, rules, and policies about AI, data protection, and telehealth. It is important to understand liability and how to report AI-related problems.
Because AI may reduce face-to-face contact, training should focus on keeping trust and care through other ways, like video calls or more in-person visits. Staff need skills to explain how AI works and manage patient expectations.
Healthcare workers should learn how AI may affect different people in unfair ways and how to find and fix these differences.
This part of training should teach how to keep patients safe when using AI virtual agents. It includes checking AI advice, watching for errors, and quick ways to respond to problems.
One important benefit of AI virtual agents in healthcare is that they can speed up office work, lower staff burden, and improve patient service. This helps medical managers and IT staff improve clinic work while keeping care quality.
AI agents can handle front-office tasks like scheduling appointments, answering patient calls, and sending reminders. For example, Simbo AI automates phone tasks by answering calls and handling routine requests without humans. This lowers waiting times, cuts missed appointments, and lets staff focus on harder jobs.
Training staff for AI workflow automation should include:
Good AI workflow training helps ensure automation supports human work without replacing accountability and care. It also helps clinics grow without raising costs, which is important in U.S. healthcare.
Researchers like Ingrid Schneider say healthcare workers need more skills to handle AI and VR legally and ethically. Preparing workers means adding AI topics to medical training and ongoing education across the country.
These skills include:
Healthcare administrators in the U.S. should make sure there are funds and support to build these skills and keep a culture of learning that matches new technology.
Though interest in AI virtual agents and VR in healthcare is growing, there are still many unknowns about long-term effects on care quality, legal rules, and healthcare workers’ roles. More research is needed on how using virtual agents affects patient satisfaction and results over time, especially in diverse U.S. communities.
Medical leaders should support pilot projects and data gathering that check how AI tools perform and their ethical effects in real clinical settings. Sharing what works and does not can help improve training approaches.
By focusing on these areas, healthcare organizations can better prepare their workers to bring AI virtual agents and VR into use responsibly and well. This will help improve patient care, keep trust, and meet legal rules in the changing U.S. healthcare setting.
Key ethical considerations include impacts on the doctor-patient relationship, privacy and data protection, fairness, transparency, safety, and accountability. VAs may reduce face-to-face contact, affecting trust and empathy, while also raising concerns about autonomy, data misuse, and informed consent.
AI agents can alter trust, empathy, and communication quality by reducing direct human interaction. Patients may perceive less personal connection, impacting treatment adherence and satisfaction, thus potentially compromising care quality.
Legal challenges involve licensing and registration across jurisdictions, liability for errors made by autonomous agents, data protection laws compliance, and determining applicable legal frameworks in cross-border care delivery.
Healthcare professionals must expand competencies to handle new technologies ethically and legally. Staff may lack training in privacy, security, and ethical decision-making related to AI, necessitating updated education and organizational support.
Incorporating user needs, experiences, and concerns early in the design process is crucial. Engaging stakeholders ‘upstream’ helps ensure privacy, safety, equity, and acceptability, reducing unintended negative outcomes.
They improve access for remote or underserved populations, reduce infection risks by limiting physical contact, and allow therapeutic experiences not feasible in real life, enhancing patient engagement and care delivery.
Safety concerns include ensuring accurate and reliable AI responses, preventing harm due to incorrect advice or system errors, and maintaining quality of care in virtual settings without direct supervision.
Transparency builds patient trust by clarifying the AI’s role, capabilities, and limitations. It also helps patients make informed decisions and enables accountability for AI-driven healthcare interactions.
Gaps include insufficient exploration of legal frameworks, long-term social impacts on professional roles, comprehensive ethical guidelines specific to AI autonomy, and understanding patient perspectives on AI-mediated care.
AI agents can support tasks like treatment adherence, education, and preventive advice, augmenting healthcare delivery while preserving human oversight to retain empathy, clinical judgment, and accountability in care.