A recent survey by Deloitte Consulting LLP in early 2024 looked at how people feel about generative AI in healthcare. The survey included over 2,000 adults across the United States and showed some key points. While 66% of people who have used generative AI for healthcare believe it could shorten appointment wait times and lower healthcare costs, overall use has not grown. In fact, it dropped slightly from 40% in 2023 to 37% in 2024.
The main reason for this slow growth is that people are starting to trust AI less. The number of people who are skeptical went up from 23% in 2023 to 30% in 2024. Distrust is higher among certain age groups; 30% of millennials and 32% of baby boomers question how reliable AI health advice is. This lack of trust not only affects patients but also makes it harder for healthcare providers to use AI tools well.
The survey also shows how important healthcare providers are in this issue. About 74% of patients trust their doctors most for medical information. This means doctors play a big role in helping patients accept AI. Patients are more open to generative AI when their care team explains it clearly and reassures them about how it is used in their treatment.
Healthcare providers face special problems when using generative AI because the data is very sensitive. Patient information must be kept private, and AI systems need to follow strict privacy laws like HIPAA. The Deloitte survey found that 41% of doctors worry about protecting patient privacy when using AI tools.
Patients also want clear information from their healthcare providers. About 80% of people surveyed want to know exactly how generative AI is used in their care. They want to understand what AI tools do, how data is handled, and what safeguards stop misuse.
If communication is not clear, patients may feel uneasy about AI advice. Many worry not just about whether AI is accurate but also about the safety of their personal health data. This creates two challenges for healthcare managers and IT teams: they must make sure AI technology fits securely into current systems and give patients easy-to-understand explanations about AI use.
Doctors and nurses are important in reducing doubts about generative AI. The 2024 Deloitte survey shows that 71% of people are okay with doctors using AI to talk about new treatments. Sixty-five percent accept AI helping to interpret test results, and 53% are comfortable with AI helping to diagnose illnesses.
Still, healthcare workers have concerns. About 39% of doctors worry that AI might weaken the personal connection between patients and doctors. They also worry about whether AI decisions are accurate and ethical.
These worries mean hospitals and medical offices need to plan training and policies carefully. Practice leaders should work with doctors to create guidelines that show how AI helps with decisions but does not replace doctors. Training can help doctors learn what AI can and cannot do, so they can explain it better to patients and build trust.
It is also recommended to add AI education in medical schools. This will prepare new doctors to use AI tools properly and handle any mistakes or biases in AI in patient care.
Generative AI can help not just with diagnosis but also in daily healthcare tasks to save time, reduce mistakes, and improve patient experience. One important area is front-office work, where AI phone services can help manage calls and patient questions.
Companies like Simbo AI offer tools that help healthcare offices reduce pressure on reception staff. Many offices have trouble answering many phone calls. AI answering services can respond quickly, gather needed information, and set appointments. This helps with one common patient complaint: long wait times and trouble reaching staff.
AI can also automate routine tasks like sending appointment reminders, refilling prescriptions, and following up with patients. This lowers costs and allows staff to focus on harder tasks. Automation also reduces human errors like missing calls or forgetting appointments.
Better access to care and reliable communication thanks to AI can also increase patient trust. When patients see these improvements, they tend to trust their healthcare provider and the technology used. Offices can include clear information about AI use in patient materials and signs, as 80% of patients want this transparency.
Healthcare leaders must make sure AI follows all laws. The US has strict rules about patient data privacy and security. AI tools need to follow HIPAA and other laws about secure data storage, encryption, and controlled access.
Bill Fera, principal at Deloitte Consulting LLP, points out that healthcare organizations face many rules when using generative AI. Managers should work with IT to create policies that protect data and explain who is responsible if AI causes errors or problems.
Ethical issues, like bias and fairness in AI, must also be addressed. AI trained on unfair or incomplete data can make healthcare unequal. Continuous monitoring, testing, and clear notes on AI advice should be standard. This helps build patient trust because it shows AI is not perfect and its limits are known.
Building trust in generative AI is not only the job of individual healthcare providers. Working with local community groups can help reach patients and explain AI tools better. Local health groups, patient advocates, and cultural organizations can educate people, answer questions, and correct wrong ideas.
Trust changes in different groups of people, so these partnerships need to communicate differently. For example, younger people like millennials who doubt AI more might respond better to online campaigns. Older adults, like baby boomers, might prefer information sessions at community centers or churches.
These team efforts help more people accept AI by sharing clear messages from both healthcare and trusted community voices.
Many people see the benefits of generative AI in healthcare, such as lower costs and shorter waits. However, less than 40% of people actually use AI tools for health reasons. This shows that there are practical, educational, and trust barriers that healthcare teams need to fix.
Medical practices that want to use generative AI must plan carefully. They need to explain clearly how AI works, how data privacy is kept, and how doctors oversee AI advice. Trust can grow step-by-step when patients get easy explanations, can choose to use AI or not, and feel AI helps their care rather than replaces doctors.
By focusing on these steps, healthcare practices in the United States can slowly build trust in generative AI. Trust is needed to use AI well to improve care, cut costs, and give patients better access to healthcare.
Consumer trust is essential for the successful adoption and utilization of generative AI in healthcare. A lack of trust may lead to decreased engagement and missed opportunities to leverage the technology’s potential benefits, such as improved access and reduced costs.
Healthcare organizations face unique challenges like handling sensitive personal data, regulatory compliance, and the need for accuracy in AI outputs. These challenges can hinder the trust and adoption of generative AI tools.
In 2024, 30% of consumers expressed distrust in AI-generated healthcare information, an increase from 23% in 2023, highlighting growing skepticism among all age groups.
Clinicians can serve as trusted sources of information, educating consumers about the benefits and limitations of generative AI tools, thereby increasing transparency and trust in the technology.
Transparency is crucial for building consumer trust. Consumers want clear information on how generative AI is utilized, including data handling methods and potential limitations associated with the technology.
Involving community partners, such as local health organizations, can leverage existing consumer trust and effectively disseminate accurate information about generative AI, enhancing overall acceptance.
In 2024, only 37% of consumers reported using generative AI for healthcare purposes, which represents a decrease from 40% in 2023, suggesting stagnant adoption rates.
Organizations should revise policies to ensure compliance with regulations concerning patient privacy and provide training that emphasizes both the utility and limitations of generative AI tools.
Consumers expressed a desire for clarity on how generative AI influences their healthcare decisions, including how it enhances diagnosis and treatment options, with 80% wanting this information.
Incorporating generative AI into medical curricula can equip future clinicians to understand its applications, recognize biases, and advocate for responsible use, ultimately enhancing patient care outcomes.