Digital health literacy (DHL) means the skills needed to find, understand, check, and use health information on electronic devices. For mental health, DHL affects how well patients use online help, join virtual therapy, or follow digital self-help plans. Medical managers and IT staff in healthcare must know that a patient’s skill with digital tools affects how well treatment works and if they stick with it.
Research shows that low mental health literacy leads to bigger gaps in treatment in the U.S. Many people don’t know enough about mental illness, feel stigma, or are afraid to ask for help. Since many mental health programs are online, patients need digital health literacy to get good care.
A study looked at 29 research papers with 11,582 people. It found that online mental health programs can improve knowledge, lower stigma, help people want treatment, and ease symptoms a bit. Right after using these programs, people knew more (effect size 0.459), and this stayed true later (effect size 0.487). Stigma lowered right after the program (effect size -0.332). This shows online resources can help mental health.
Still, keeping these improvements over time is hard. Stigma often goes back up, and people may stop seeking help. So, digital care programs need to plan for ongoing support. Health leaders should think about this when making programs that last.
People in the U.S. have very different digital health literacy. Older adults, lower-income groups, and people in rural areas often know less about technology, making it hard to reach them with online mental health care. Health workers also find it hard to keep patients using online tools. Therapist-guided internet therapy had fewer people leaving the program than fully self-guided programs, showing human help is still important.
For healthcare owners and IT managers, this means picking easy-to-use technology, training patients when needed, and checking how well patients stay involved. The problem is how to balance automatic programs meant to help many people with personal help needed for lasting care.
One way to fix digital literacy gaps and improve care is by using tests that measure eHealth skills. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) checks how well patients find, understand, and use online health info. Medical teams can give this test to figure out patients’ skills and change programs to fit their needs.
Patients scoring low might get more therapist support, digital skills training, or simpler websites. Those with high skills can use more independent online programs. This approach makes sure mental health care fits each person instead of one model for all.
Using digital literacy tests also helps health systems gather data on all patients. This info helps plan services and tech tools better. It shows when a mix of digital and human care works best.
AI and workflow automation are changing mental health services, especially in front desk work and patient contact. For example, Simbo AI uses AI to answer phones and do tasks that lower staff work, make business run smoother, and improve patient experience.
In busy medical offices, calls often ask for appointments, follow-ups, or urgent help. Simbo AI answers quickly, so patients wait less and staff can do other work. AI systems also collect accurate data like symptom reports or appointment reminders, which update electronic health records in real time.
AI tools can also:
Health practice managers using AI tools like Simbo AI get better flow and happier patients. This fits with the trend of mixing human and AI help in health care.
The U.S. health system has special rules and chances when using digital mental health. Laws like HIPAA need patient data handled by AI and digital tools to be very private and safe.
Managers and IT staff must make sure digital literacy tests, AI use, and online mental health platforms follow federal rules and health standards. They must also plan well to connect new tools with existing electronic record systems and schedules for smooth work.
Knowing patient digital skills helps leaders choose platforms, train staff, and use resources well. In cities, fast internet helps run advanced online programs. In rural places, limits on internet may mean using mixed digital and in-person care or low-data options.
Also, it’s important to be open with patients about using AI. This builds trust and follows ethics. Patients should know how AI helps their care, what data is collected, and how they can say no if they want.
Helping patients get better at digital health has benefits for individuals and health organizations too. More patient use of online mental health resources means fewer missed appointments, better following of care plans, and less crowding in clinics. This can save money and time.
Hospitals and clinics that check and improve patient digital skills may see better results in long-term disease care and mental health treatment. They also show they want fair access to care, which is important as health payments shift toward paying for quality.
Digital health literacy is important for making online mental health resources work well. By checking patient skills with tools like eHEALS and using AI systems like Simbo AI’s phone automation, U.S. health organizations can offer better and easier mental health care. This helps patients get better results and makes health services run more smoothly. Medical administrators and IT managers must carefully plan to meet the growing needs of digital mental health care today.
JMIR is a leading, peer-reviewed open access journal focusing on digital medicine and health care technologies. It ranks highly in Medical Informatics and Health Care Sciences, making it a significant source for research on emerging digital health innovations, including public mental health interventions.
JMIR provides open access to research that includes applied science on digital health tools, which allied health professionals can use for patient education, prevention, and clinical care, thus enhancing access to current evidence-based mental health interventions.
The journal covers Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapies (iCBTs), including therapist-assisted and self-guided formats, highlighting their cost-effectiveness and use in treating various mental health disorders with attention to engagement and adherence.
Therapist-assisted iCBTs have lower dropout rates compared to self-guided ones, indicating that therapist involvement supports engagement and adherence, which is crucial for effective public mental health intervention delivery.
Long-term engagement remains challenging, with research suggesting microinterventions as a way to provide flexible, short, and meaningful behavior changes. However, integrating multiple microinterventions into coherent narratives over time needs further exploration.
Digital health literacy is essential for patients and providers to effectively utilize online resources. Tools like the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) help assess these skills to tailor interventions and ensure access and understanding.
Biofeedback systems show promise in improving psychological well-being and mental health among workers, although current evidence often comes from controlled settings, limiting generalizability for workplace public mental health initiatives.
AI integration offers potential improvements in decision-making and patient care but raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the right to explanation, affecting ethical delivery of digital mental health services.
Barriers include maintaining patient engagement, ensuring adequate therapist involvement, digital literacy limitations, and navigating complex legal and ethical frameworks around new technologies like AI.
JMIR encourages open science, patient participation as peer reviewers, and publication of protocols before data collection, supporting collaborative and transparent research that can inform more accessible mental health interventions for allied health professionals.